From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <nyoushchenko@mvista.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] signal: sys_sigprocmask() needs retarget_shared_pending()
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:57:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110427125710.GA21281@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinp8FGQu2D1NVVc7xfEsqopook7Hg@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/26, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > + sigemptyset(&new_full_set);
> > + if (how == SIG_SETMASK)
> > + new_full_set = current->blocked;
> > + new_full_set.sig[0] = new_set;
>
> Ugh. This is just ugly.
Agreed.
> Could we not instead turn the whole thing into a "clear these bits"
> and "set these bits", and get rid of the "how" entirely for the helper
> function?
>
> IOW, we'd have
>
> switch (how) {
> case SIG_BLOCK:
> clear_bits = 0;
> set_bits = new_set;
> break;
> case SIG_UNBLOCK:
> clear_bits = new_set;
> set_bits = 0;
> break
> case SIG_SET:
> clear_bits = low_bits;
> set_bits = new_set;
> break;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> and notice how you now can do that helper function *WITHOUT* any
> conditionals, and just make it do
>
> sigprocmask(&clear, &set, NULL);
>
> which handles all cases correctly (just "andn clear" + "or set") with
> no if's or switch'es.
>
> This is why I _detest_ that idiotic "sigprocmask()" interface.
Agreed, but...
Yes, sigprocmask(how) is ugly, but there are sys_rt_sigprocmask() and
sys_sigprocmask() which have to handle these SIG_* operations anyway.
So, I think we should do:
1. Almost all callers of sigprocmask() use SIG_SETMASK, we can
simply change them to use set_current_blocked().
2. Add the new helper (probably like you suggested) and convert
other 9 callers.
3. Unexport sigprocmask() and remove the last "*oldset" argument,
it should be only used by sys_*sigprocmask() syscalls.
But firstly I'd like to finish this "don't change ->blocked directly"
conversion. And this patch changes sys_sigprocmask() so that it looks
similar to sys_rt_sigprocmask().
What do you think?
If you can't accept sys_sigprocmask()->sigprocmask(), will you agree
with
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sigprocmask, int, how, old_sigset_t __user *, nset,
old_sigset_t __user *, oset)
{
old_sigset_t old_set, new_set;
sigset_t new_blocked;
old_set = current->blocked.sig[0];
if (nset) {
if (copy_from_user(&new_set, nset, sizeof(*nset)))
return -EFAULT;
new_set &= ~(sigmask(SIGKILL) | sigmask(SIGSTOP));
new_blocked = current->blocked;
switch (how) {
case SIG_BLOCK:
sigaddsetmask(&new_blocked, new_set);
break;
case SIG_UNBLOCK:
sigdelsetmask(&new_blocked, new_set);
break;
case SIG_SETMASK:
new_blocked.sig[0] = new_set;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
set_current_blocked(&new_blocked);
}
if (oset) {
if (copy_to_user(oset, &old_set, sizeof(*oset)))
return -EFAULT;
}
return 0;
}
?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-27 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-18 13:44 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] signal: sigprocmask fixes Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-18 13:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] signal: introduce retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:04 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 10:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] signal: retarget_shared_pending: consider shared/unblocked signals only Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:22 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 10:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 15:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 16:19 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 17:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 17:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-26 19:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-28 15:26 ` [PATCHSET] signals-review branch Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-30 12:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] signal: retarget_shared_pending: optimize while_each_thread() loop Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:26 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] signal: sigprocmask: narrow the scope of ->siglock Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:31 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] signal: sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 12:46 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:14 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] x86: signal: handle_signal() should use set_current_blocked() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 13:45 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:19 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] x86: signal: sys_rt_sigreturn() " Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 14:14 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 18:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 11:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 8/7] signal: cleanup sys_rt_sigprocmask() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-22 14:30 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 18:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-23 18:47 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-25 11:26 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-18 17:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] signal: sigprocmask fixes Linus Torvalds
2011-04-18 17:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-18 17:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-23 17:59 ` [PATCH 0/3] do_sigtimedwait() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-23 17:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] signal: sys_rt_sigtimedwait: simplify the timeout logic Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 11:37 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 17:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-25 17:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-26 10:18 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 17:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] signal: introduce do_sigtimedwait() to factor out compat/native code Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 11:39 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 11:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 15:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 16:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-26 10:28 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-23 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] signal: do_sigtimedwait() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 11:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 16:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 16:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-25 17:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-25 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-26 10:40 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-26 10:42 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-26 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] sigtimedwait/sigprocmask need retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] signal: sys_rt_sigtimedwait: simplify the timeout logic Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] signal: introduce do_sigtimedwait() to factor out compat/native code Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-27 10:09 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 21:24 ` Matt Fleming
2011-05-11 16:21 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-12 18:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-13 16:44 ` [PATCH] signal: trivial, fix the "timespec declared inside parameter list" warning Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-13 18:09 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-16 12:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-16 12:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-16 17:39 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-18 23:37 ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-19 18:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-19 19:21 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-04-26 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] signal: do_sigtimedwait() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] signal: cleanup sys_sigprocmask() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-27 10:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 21:31 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] signal: sys_sigprocmask() needs retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 21:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-27 12:57 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-04-27 13:04 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 20:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-01 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] signal: rename signandsets() to sigandnsets() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-27 10:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 21:43 ` Matt Fleming
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-27 1:35 [PATCH v2 5/6] signal: sys_sigprocmask() needs retarget_shared_pending() George Spelvin
2011-04-27 2:00 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110427125710.GA21281@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=nyoushchenko@mvista.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.