From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: minchan.kim@gmail.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 09:15:49 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110504231549.GA25956@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1105041205340.18728@trent.utfs.org>
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:10:04PM -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Wed, 4 May 2011 at 21:12, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> Ok, that will be helpful. Also helpful is that I've (FINALLY!)
> >> reproduced this myself, and i think i can now reproduce it at will
> >> on a highmem i686 machine. I'll look into it more later tonight....
>
> I've tried to reproduce it on an SMP i686 with 1024MB RAM, but there was
> no OOM there.
>
> > And here's a patch for you to try. It fixes the problem on my test
> > machine.....
>
> Excellent! After one run with that patch, the machine does not go OOM any
> more when running du(1) over this XFS filesystem.
Ok, That is good to know that we are seeing the same problem ;)
I'll push the fix through the XFS tree to mainline. Thanks for all
your effort helping me understand and debug the problem, Christian.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 09:15:49 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110504231549.GA25956@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1105041205340.18728@trent.utfs.org>
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:10:04PM -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Wed, 4 May 2011 at 21:12, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> Ok, that will be helpful. Also helpful is that I've (FINALLY!)
> >> reproduced this myself, and i think i can now reproduce it at will
> >> on a highmem i686 machine. I'll look into it more later tonight....
>
> I've tried to reproduce it on an SMP i686 with 1024MB RAM, but there was
> no OOM there.
>
> > And here's a patch for you to try. It fixes the problem on my test
> > machine.....
>
> Excellent! After one run with that patch, the machine does not go OOM any
> more when running du(1) over this XFS filesystem.
Ok, That is good to know that we are seeing the same problem ;)
I'll push the fix through the XFS tree to mainline. Thanks for all
your effort helping me understand and debug the problem, Christian.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-04 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-22 1:57 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks Christian Kujau
2011-04-22 1:57 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-22 2:58 ` Minchan Kim
2011-04-22 2:58 ` Minchan Kim
2011-04-22 3:03 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-22 3:03 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-22 17:41 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-22 17:41 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-22 18:46 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-22 18:46 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-22 22:47 ` Minchan Kim
2011-04-22 22:47 ` Minchan Kim
2011-04-24 23:46 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-24 23:46 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-25 5:51 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-25 5:51 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-25 7:19 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-25 7:19 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-26 15:14 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-26 15:14 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-27 2:26 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-27 2:26 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-27 7:46 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-27 7:46 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-27 10:28 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-27 10:28 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-27 23:16 ` Minchan Kim
2011-04-27 23:16 ` Minchan Kim
2011-04-27 23:56 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-27 23:56 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-28 17:30 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-28 17:30 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-28 23:37 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-28 23:37 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-29 17:32 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-29 17:32 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-29 19:58 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-29 19:58 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-29 20:17 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-29 20:17 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-29 20:20 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-29 20:20 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-29 20:21 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-29 20:21 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-30 0:17 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-30 0:17 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-01 8:01 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-01 8:01 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-02 4:59 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-02 4:59 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-02 12:19 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-02 12:19 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-02 19:59 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-02 19:59 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-03 0:51 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-03 0:51 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-03 4:04 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-03 4:04 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-03 6:36 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-03 6:36 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-03 20:53 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-03 20:53 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-04 0:46 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-04 0:46 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-04 1:51 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-04 1:51 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-04 7:36 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-04 7:36 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-04 11:12 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-04 11:12 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-04 19:10 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-04 19:10 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-04 23:15 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-05-04 23:15 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-05 2:07 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-05 2:07 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-02 9:26 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-02 9:26 ` Christian Kujau
2011-05-02 12:38 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-02 12:38 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-25 8:02 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-25 8:02 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-25 9:50 ` Christian Kujau
2011-04-25 9:50 ` Christian Kujau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110504231549.GA25956@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@nerdbynature.de \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.