From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix constructing the span cpu mask of sched domain
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 09:12:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110506071233.GC23166@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=qPWxRAa6+dT3ohEP6Z=0v+e4EXA@mail.gmail.com>
* Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
> For a given node, when constructing the cpumask for its sched_domain
> to span, if there is no best node available after searching, further
> efforts could be saved, based on small change in the return value of
> find_next_best_node().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> --- a/kernel/sched.c 2011-04-27 11:48:50.000000000 +0800
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c 2011-05-05 20:44:52.000000000 +0800
> @@ -6787,7 +6787,7 @@ init_sched_build_groups(const struct cpu
> */
> static int find_next_best_node(int node, nodemask_t *used_nodes)
> {
> - int i, n, val, min_val, best_node = 0;
> + int i, n, val, min_val, best_node = -1;
>
> min_val = INT_MAX;
>
> @@ -6811,7 +6811,8 @@ static int find_next_best_node(int node,
> }
> }
>
> - node_set(best_node, *used_nodes);
> + if (best_node != -1)
> + node_set(best_node, *used_nodes);
> return best_node;
> }
>
> @@ -6837,7 +6838,8 @@ static void sched_domain_node_span(int n
>
> for (i = 1; i < SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN; i++) {
> int next_node = find_next_best_node(node, &used_nodes);
> -
> + if (next_node < 0)
> + break;
> cpumask_or(span, span, cpumask_of_node(next_node));
> }
> }
Looks good. I changed the title from:
sched: fix constructing the span cpu mask of sched domain
to:
sched: Shorten the constructing of the span cpu mask of sched domain
Because unless i missed some side effect it really does not 'fix' anything, it
avoids repetitive (and ultimately fruitless) extra work, right?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-06 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-05 12:53 [PATCH] sched: fix constructing the span cpu mask of sched domain Hillf Danton
2011-05-06 7:12 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-05-06 7:40 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Shorten the construction of " tip-bot for Hillf Danton
2011-05-10 8:32 ` [PATCH] sched: fix constructing " Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-10 12:29 ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-11 13:26 ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-11 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-11 14:10 ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-11 14:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-11 14:23 ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-13 13:06 ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-15 5:50 ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-17 9:23 ` Andreas Herrmann
2011-05-17 14:36 ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-18 2:45 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-18 15:12 ` Hillf Danton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110506071233.GC23166@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.