All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: "Figo.zhang" <figo1802@gmail.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujisu.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]mm/compation.c: checking page in lru twice
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:26:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110506182643.GH6330@random.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110506130955.GF4941@csn.ul.ie>

On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 02:09:55PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 07:32:46PM +0800, Figo.zhang wrote:
> > 
> > in isolate_migratepages() have check page in LRU twice, the next one
> > at _isolate_lru_page(). 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Figo.zhang <figo1802@gmail.com> 
> 
> Not checking for PageLRU means that PageTransHuge() gets called
> for each page. While the scanner is active and the lock released,
> a transparent hugepage can be created and potentially we test
> PageTransHuge() on a tail page. This will trigger a BUG if
> CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is set.

Agreed. The compound_order also would become unsafe even if it was
initially an head page (if it's a compound page not in lru). And
compound_trans_order isn't a solution either because we need to be
head for it to be safe like you said, better not having to use
compound_trans_order.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: "Figo.zhang" <figo1802@gmail.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujisu.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]mm/compation.c: checking page in lru twice
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:26:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110506182643.GH6330@random.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110506130955.GF4941@csn.ul.ie>

On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 02:09:55PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 07:32:46PM +0800, Figo.zhang wrote:
> > 
> > in isolate_migratepages() have check page in LRU twice, the next one
> > at _isolate_lru_page(). 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Figo.zhang <figo1802@gmail.com> 
> 
> Not checking for PageLRU means that PageTransHuge() gets called
> for each page. While the scanner is active and the lock released,
> a transparent hugepage can be created and potentially we test
> PageTransHuge() on a tail page. This will trigger a BUG if
> CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is set.

Agreed. The compound_order also would become unsafe even if it was
initially an head page (if it's a compound page not in lru). And
compound_trans_order isn't a solution either because we need to be
head for it to be safe like you said, better not having to use
compound_trans_order.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-06 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-06 11:32 [PATCH]mm/compation.c: checking page in lru twice Figo.zhang
2011-05-06 11:32 ` Figo.zhang
2011-05-06 13:09 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-06 13:09   ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-06 18:26   ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2011-05-06 18:26     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-06 18:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-06 18:21   ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110506182643.GH6330@random.random \
    --to=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=figo1802@gmail.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujisu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.