All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: 625914@bugs.debian.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] Bug#625914: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: bridging is not	interacting well with multicast in 2.6.38-4
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 11:05:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110510180540.GI6397@morgul.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305031369.4065.259.camel@localhost>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2497 bytes --]

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 01:42:49PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > This is pretty weird.  Debian version 2.6.38-3 has a few bridging
> > > changes from stable 2.6.38.3 and 2.6.38.4, but they don't look like they
> > > would cause this.
> > 
> > I have apparently filed the bug against the wrong version of Debian's
> > kernel.  2.6.38-3 is not affected, and works as expected.  The change
> > was introduced in -4.  That may have been clear from the report itself,
> > but the report was filed against -3.  I've fixed that in the BTS.
> 
> I gathered that, and then made the same mistake in writing the above!
> The version with the regression, 2.6.38-4, includes the changes from
> stable 2.6.38.3 and 2.6.38.4

With a little help from git bisect, I've tracked this regression down to
the following commit to the stable-2.6.38.y tree:

commit 5f1c356a3fadc0c19922d660da723b79bcc9aad7
Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:   Fri Mar 18 05:27:28 2011 +0000

    bridge: Reset IPCB when entering IP stack on NF_FORWARD
    
    [ Upstream commit 6b1e960fdbd75dcd9bcc3ba5ff8898ff1ad30b6e ]
    
    Whenever we enter the IP stack proper from bridge netfilter we
    need to ensure that the skb is in a form the IP stack expects
    it to be in.
    
    The entry point on NF_FORWARD did not meet the requirements of
    the IP stack, therefore leading to potential crashes/panics.
    
    This patch fixes the problem.
    
    Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
    Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
    Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

The diff is
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
index 4b5b66d..49d50ea 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
@@ -741,6 +741,9 @@ static unsigned int br_nf_forward_ip(unsigned int
hook, struct sk_buff *skb,
                nf_bridge->mask |= BRNF_PKT_TYPE;
        }
 
+       if (br_parse_ip_options(skb))
+               return NF_DROP;
+
        /* The physdev module checks on this */
        nf_bridge->mask |= BRNF_BRIDGED;
        nf_bridge->physoutdev = skb->dev;

If I revert this change, network connectivity functions as expected for
the VMs on this host.

I don't know enough about this change or the problem it was supposed to
solve to be able to guess about what's going wrong.

noah


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: 625914@bugs.debian.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Bug#625914: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: bridging is not interacting well with multicast in 2.6.38-4
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 11:05:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110510180540.GI6397@morgul.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305031369.4065.259.camel@localhost>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2497 bytes --]

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 01:42:49PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > This is pretty weird.  Debian version 2.6.38-3 has a few bridging
> > > changes from stable 2.6.38.3 and 2.6.38.4, but they don't look like they
> > > would cause this.
> > 
> > I have apparently filed the bug against the wrong version of Debian's
> > kernel.  2.6.38-3 is not affected, and works as expected.  The change
> > was introduced in -4.  That may have been clear from the report itself,
> > but the report was filed against -3.  I've fixed that in the BTS.
> 
> I gathered that, and then made the same mistake in writing the above!
> The version with the regression, 2.6.38-4, includes the changes from
> stable 2.6.38.3 and 2.6.38.4

With a little help from git bisect, I've tracked this regression down to
the following commit to the stable-2.6.38.y tree:

commit 5f1c356a3fadc0c19922d660da723b79bcc9aad7
Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:   Fri Mar 18 05:27:28 2011 +0000

    bridge: Reset IPCB when entering IP stack on NF_FORWARD
    
    [ Upstream commit 6b1e960fdbd75dcd9bcc3ba5ff8898ff1ad30b6e ]
    
    Whenever we enter the IP stack proper from bridge netfilter we
    need to ensure that the skb is in a form the IP stack expects
    it to be in.
    
    The entry point on NF_FORWARD did not meet the requirements of
    the IP stack, therefore leading to potential crashes/panics.
    
    This patch fixes the problem.
    
    Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
    Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
    Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

The diff is
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
index 4b5b66d..49d50ea 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
@@ -741,6 +741,9 @@ static unsigned int br_nf_forward_ip(unsigned int
hook, struct sk_buff *skb,
                nf_bridge->mask |= BRNF_PKT_TYPE;
        }
 
+       if (br_parse_ip_options(skb))
+               return NF_DROP;
+
        /* The physdev module checks on this */
        nf_bridge->mask |= BRNF_BRIDGED;
        nf_bridge->physoutdev = skb->dev;

If I revert this change, network connectivity functions as expected for
the VMs on this host.

I don't know enough about this change or the problem it was supposed to
solve to be able to guess about what's going wrong.

noah


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-10 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20110506201234.6297.70279.reportbug@ip6-localhost>
2011-05-10  2:38 ` [Bridge] Bug#625914: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: bridging is not interacting well with multicast in 2.6.38-4 Ben Hutchings
2011-05-10  2:38   ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-10  3:15   ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-10  3:15     ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-10  4:38   ` [Bridge] " Noah Meyerhans
2011-05-10  4:38     ` Noah Meyerhans
2011-05-10 12:42     ` [Bridge] " Ben Hutchings
2011-05-10 12:42       ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-10 12:55       ` Yann Dupont
2011-05-10 18:05       ` Noah Meyerhans [this message]
2011-05-10 18:05         ` Noah Meyerhans
2011-05-10 22:11         ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-10 22:11           ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-10 23:35           ` Noah Meyerhans
2011-05-10 23:35             ` Noah Meyerhans
2011-05-12 22:59             ` David Miller
2011-05-12 22:59               ` David Miller
2011-05-12 23:28               ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-12 23:28                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-12 23:43             ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-12 23:43               ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-13  5:03               ` Noah Meyerhans
2011-05-13  5:03                 ` Noah Meyerhans
2011-05-13 18:03             ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-13 18:03               ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-13 19:53             ` [Bridge] [PATCH] bridge: fix forwarding of IPv6 Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-13 19:53               ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-13 20:00               ` [Bridge] " Eric Dumazet
2011-05-13 20:00                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-13 20:02                 ` [Bridge] " David Miller
2011-05-13 20:02                   ` David Miller
2011-05-13 20:05                   ` [Bridge] " Eric Dumazet
2011-05-13 20:05                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-13 20:24                   ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-13 20:03               ` David Miller
2011-05-13 20:03                 ` David Miller
2011-05-13 21:00               ` [Bridge] " Noah Meyerhans
2011-05-13 21:00                 ` Noah Meyerhans

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110510180540.GI6397@morgul.net \
    --to=noahm@debian.org \
    --cc=625914@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.