From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_write straight
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:38:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110511143807.GA28435@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110510134406.GG4402@quack.suse.cz>
> One more thing that I've noticed while looking through this patch: You
> are removing several trace points (without actually removing the trace
> point definitions BTW):
> trace_wbc_writeback_start(&wbc, wb->bdi);
> trace_wbc_writeback_written(&wbc, wb->bdi);
> trace_wbc_writeback_wait(&wbc, wb->bdi);
> trace_wbc_balance_dirty_start(&wbc, bdi);
> trace_wbc_balance_dirty_written(&wbc, bdi);
> trace_wbc_balance_dirty_wait(&wbc, bdi);
>
> I guess they should be replaced with equivalent trace points that take
> struct wb_writeback_work as an argument instead of just removing them?
OK. How about this change?
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 3 ++
include/trace/events/writeback.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
mm/page-writeback.c | 3 ++
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- linux-next.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2011-05-11 22:19:22.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/fs/fs-writeback.c 2011-05-11 22:20:50.000000000 +0800
@@ -731,6 +731,7 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writ
}
retry:
+ trace_writeback_start(wb->bdi, work);
spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
if (list_empty(&wb->b_io))
queue_io(wb, work->older_than_this);
@@ -739,6 +740,7 @@ retry:
else
progress = __writeback_inodes_wb(wb, work);
spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+ trace_writeback_written(wb->bdi, work);
/*
* Did we write something? Try for more
@@ -775,6 +777,7 @@ retry:
*/
spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
if (!list_empty(&wb->b_more_io)) {
+ trace_writeback_wait(wb->bdi, work);
inode = wb_inode(wb->b_more_io.prev);
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
inode_wait_for_writeback(inode, wb);
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-05-11 22:19:22.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-05-11 22:20:50.000000000 +0800
@@ -555,14 +555,17 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
* threshold otherwise wait until the disk writes catch
* up.
*/
+ trace_balance_dirty_start(bdi);
if (bdi_nr_reclaimable > bdi_thresh) {
pages_written += writeback_inodes_wb(&bdi->wb,
write_chunk);
+ trace_balance_dirty_written(bdi, pages_written);
if (pages_written >= write_chunk)
break; /* We've done our duty */
}
__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
io_schedule_timeout(pause);
+ trace_balance_dirty_wait(bdi);
/*
* Increase the delay for each loop, up to our previous
--- linux-next.orig/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2011-05-11 22:19:22.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2011-05-11 22:22:20.000000000 +0800
@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(writeback_work_class, name,
DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_nothread);
DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_queue);
DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_exec);
+DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_start);
+DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_written);
+DEFINE_WRITEBACK_WORK_EVENT(writeback_wait);
TRACE_EVENT(writeback_pages_written,
TP_PROTO(long pages_written),
@@ -88,6 +91,30 @@ DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(writeback_bdi_reg
DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(writeback_bdi_unregister);
DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(writeback_thread_start);
DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(writeback_thread_stop);
+DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(balance_dirty_start);
+DEFINE_WRITEBACK_EVENT(balance_dirty_wait);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(balance_dirty_written,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, int written),
+
+ TP_ARGS(bdi, written),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __array(char, name, 32)
+ __field(int, written)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ strncpy(__entry->name, dev_name(bdi->dev), 32);
+ __entry->written = written;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("bdi %s written %d",
+ __entry->name,
+ __entry->written
+ )
+);
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(wbc_class,
TP_PROTO(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct backing_dev_info *bdi),
@@ -137,12 +164,6 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(wbc_class,
DEFINE_EVENT(wbc_class, name, \
TP_PROTO(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct backing_dev_info *bdi), \
TP_ARGS(wbc, bdi))
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_start);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_written);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writeback_wait);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_start);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_written);
-DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_balance_dirty_wait);
DEFINE_WBC_EVENT(wbc_writepage);
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(writeback_congest_waited_template,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-11 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-06 3:08 [PATCH 00/17] writeback fixes and cleanups for 2.6.40 Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 01/17] writeback: introduce wbc.tagged_sync for the WB_SYNC_NONE sync stage Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 16:08 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 02/17] writeback: update dirtied_when for synced inode to prevent livelock Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 16:33 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10 2:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-10 12:05 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 03/17] writeback: introduce writeback_control.inodes_cleaned Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 14:36 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10 2:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-10 13:52 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10 15:00 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 04/17] writeback: try more writeback as long as something was written Wu Fengguang
2011-05-09 16:05 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10 2:40 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 05/17] writeback: the kupdate expire timestamp should be a moving target Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 06/17] writeback: sync expired inodes first in background writeback Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 19:02 ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-09 16:08 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-09 16:18 ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-10 2:45 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 07/17] writeback: refill b_io iff empty Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 08/17] writeback: split inode_wb_list_lock into bdi_writeback.list_lock Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 09/17] writeback: elevate queue_io() into wb_writeback() Wu Fengguang
2011-05-09 16:15 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 10/17] writeback: avoid extra sync work at enqueue time Wu Fengguang
2011-05-09 16:16 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 11/17] writeback: add bdi_dirty_limit() kernel-doc Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 12/17] writeback: skip balance_dirty_pages() for in-memory fs Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 13/17] writeback: remove writeback_control.more_io Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 14/17] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_write straight Wu Fengguang
2011-05-09 16:54 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-10 3:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-10 13:44 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-11 14:38 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-05-11 14:54 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 15/17] writeback: remove .nonblocking and .encountered_congestion Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 16/17] writeback: trace event writeback_single_inode Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 4:16 ` [PATCH 16/17] writeback: trace event writeback_single_inode (v2) Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 17/17] writeback: trace event writeback_queue_io Wu Fengguang
2011-05-06 4:06 ` [PATCH 00/17] writeback fixes and cleanups for 2.6.40 Anca Emanuel
2011-05-06 4:09 ` Wu Fengguang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-12 13:57 [PATCH 00/17] writeback fixes and cleanups for 2.6.40 (v2) Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 14/17] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_write straight Wu Fengguang
2011-05-12 14:56 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-12 23:18 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-13 5:28 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-16 0:12 ` Dave Chinner
2011-05-16 12:05 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110511143807.GA28435@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.