From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, vda.linux@googlemail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, indan@nul.nu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] ptrace: move JOBCTL_TRAPPING wait to wait(2) and ptrace_check_attach()
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:20:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110512182006.GA25850@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110512160709.GL1030@htj.dyndns.org>
On 05/12, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 05:59:10PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > Also. _Perhaps_ we can rethink the SIGCONT trapping, and perhaps in
> > this case do_wait() won't need any changes. May be.
>
> But, if there's a better way, sure.
Unfortunately, I have no any particular ideas right now, and I doubt
I can invent something clean. But I'd like at least to try to think
a bit.
Now about GROUP_STOP_TRAPPING. To simplify the discussion, lets
forget about this series, please recall the previous
"ptrace: use GROUP_STOP_TRAPPING for PTRACE_DETACH too" change.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130486589601593
In short, it changes __ptrace_unlink() to set _TRAPPING if needed,
and ptrace_attach() waits for !TRAPPING unconditionally.
Problem: TRAPPING can be set outside of do_signal_stop() paths, and
I think we should avoid this as much as possible.
(I am ignoring the problem this patch addresses temporary, I think
we can fix it a bit differently).
As we already discussed, this patch is not right, we have the problems
with KILL/CONT. The proposed solution is to clear TRAPPING on kill,
but I think this is not enough.
One particular example. Note that de_thread() waits ->notify_count == 0
in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE. Btw, this is not good, we need TASK_KILLABLE,
but this doesn't matter in this discussion. The only imporant thing is
that it is practically impossible to make this path restartable.
Note also we have PT_TRACE_EXIT, the sub-thread stops even if killed by
the execing thread. (to clarify, this depends on /dev/random and should
be fixed, and in fact it is debatable whether it should stop, please
ignore).
Now suppose we are tracing 2 threads, T1 execs and kills T2, T2 reports
PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT. Now, if the tracer waits for !(T1 & TRAPPING), it will
wait forever.
Say, the thread group was stopped, the tracer PTRACE_CONT's T1, it calls
sys_execve() and reports the trap from syscall_trace_enter().
The tracer does ptrace(T1, DETACH) + ptrace(T1, SEIZE) and hangs forever.
Once again, this is only one example. coredump, vfork, probably something
else. In short: I think that TRAPPING-outside-of-do_signal_stop is the
can of worms.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-12 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-08 15:48 [PATCHSET ptrace] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE/INTERRUPT and group stop notification Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:48 ` [PATCH 01/11] job control: rename signal->group_stop and flags to jobctl and rearrange flags Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:48 ` [PATCH 02/11] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE Tejun Heo
2011-05-09 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-10 9:46 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-10 13:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-10 13:47 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-10 18:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-15 15:56 ` PTRACE_SEIZE should not stop [Re: [PATCH 02/11] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE] Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-15 16:26 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 17:15 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-15 17:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 19:48 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 8:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 12:26 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 12:42 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 13:03 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 13:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 13:21 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 13:45 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 13:48 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 13:54 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:48 ` [PATCH 03/11] ptrace: ptrace_check_attach(): rename @kill to @ignore_state and add comments Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:48 ` [PATCH 04/11] ptrace: implement PTRACE_INTERRUPT Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 21:58 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-09 10:09 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-09 10:55 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-09 16:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-10 9:50 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-10 14:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-10 14:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-10 18:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-11 8:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 17:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-12 17:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-10 21:59 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-11 9:19 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 12:23 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-11 13:22 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 16:20 ` Bryan Donlan
2011-05-11 19:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 16:10 ` PTRACE_DETACH without stop [Re: [PATCH 04/11] ptrace: implement PTRACE_INTERRUPT] Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-15 16:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 17:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 9:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 12:08 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 12:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:48 ` [PATCH 05/11] ptrace: restructure ptrace_getsiginfo() Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:49 ` [PATCH 06/11] ptrace: make group stop state visible via PTRACE_GETSIGINFO Tejun Heo
2011-05-10 16:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-10 17:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-11 8:08 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 16:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-12 17:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:49 ` [PATCH 07/11] ptrace: add JOBCTL_TRAPPED Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:49 ` [PATCH 08/11] ptrace: move fallback JOBCTL_TRAPPING clearing to get_signal_to_deliver() Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 15:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-11 19:17 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 15:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-08 15:49 ` [PATCH 09/11] job control: reorganize wait_task_stopped() Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 15:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-11 19:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 15:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-12 16:02 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 17:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-12 17:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 18:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-13 8:46 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-13 17:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-14 10:56 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 14:40 ` waitpid(WNOHANG) should report SIGCHLD-notified signals [Re: [PATCH 09/11] job control: reorganize wait_task_stopped()] Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-15 16:47 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 17:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 17:47 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 12:11 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 12:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 12:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 12:46 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 15:49 ` [PATCH 10/11] ptrace: move JOBCTL_TRAPPING wait to wait(2) and ptrace_check_attach() Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 16:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-11 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-11 19:45 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 19:53 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 10:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 16:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-12 15:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-12 16:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 18:20 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-05-13 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-13 18:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-08 15:49 ` [PATCH 11/11] ptrace: implement group stop notification for ptracer Tejun Heo
2011-05-08 22:42 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-09 10:10 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-10 22:37 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-11 9:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 12:01 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-11 13:13 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 19:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-11 20:18 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-11 20:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-12 10:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 14:02 ` getter PTRACE_GETSIGINFO should not modify anything [Re: [PATCH 11/11] ptrace: implement group stop notification for ptracer] Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-15 14:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 17:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-15 17:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 20:06 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 8:43 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 12:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-05-16 12:56 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-16 13:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-08 22:27 ` [PATCHSET ptrace] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE/INTERRUPT and group stop notification Denys Vlasenko
2011-05-09 9:48 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-15 13:55 ` ptrace-testsuite status [Re: [PATCHSET ptrace] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE/INTERRUPT and group stop notification] Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110512182006.GA25850@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.