From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Make the x86-64 stacktrace code safely callable from scheduler
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:28:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110512212810.GA17596@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305232326-9804-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> Avoid potential scheduler recursion and deadlock from the
> stacktrace code by avoiding rescheduling when we re-enable
> preemption.
>
> This robustifies some scheduler trace events like sched switch
> when they are used to produce callchains in perf or ftrace.
> - put_cpu();
> +
> + /* We want stacktrace to be computable anywhere, even in the scheduler */
> + preempt_enable_no_resched();
So what happens if a callchain profiling happens to be interrupted by a hardirq
and the interrupt reschedules the current task? We'll miss the reschedule,
right?
preempt_enable_no_resched() is not a magic 'solve scheduler recursions' bullet
- it's to be used only if something else will guarantee the preemption check!
But nothing guarantees it here AFAICS.
A better fix would be to use local_irq_save()/restore().
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-12 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-12 20:32 [GIT PULL] x86 stacktrace updates Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-12 20:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Remove warning and warning_symbol from struct stacktrace_ops Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-14 11:01 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-14 13:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-12 20:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Make the x86-64 stacktrace code safely callable from scheduler Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-12 20:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-12 21:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-05-12 21:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-12 21:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 10:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-05-13 12:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-13 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-13 13:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110512212810.GA17596@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.