From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [Patch] bridge: call NETDEV_ENSLAVE notifiers when adding a slave
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:04:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110519090411.1f039a88@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110519081213.15c05da2@nehalam>
On Thu, 19 May 2011 08:12:13 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2011 18:24:17 +0800
> Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > In the previous patch I added NETDEV_ENSLAVE, now
> > we can notify netconsole when adding a device to a bridge too.
> >
> > By the way, s/netdev_bonding_change/call_netdevice_notifiers/ in
> > bond_main.c, since this is not bonding specific.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>
> >
>
> Is there a usage for this? What listens for this notification?
Never mind it was in the first patch which you did not send.
You should always put a number on group of patches and send
to all parties.
Also, sending networking patches to LKML is a waste of bandwidth
please don't bother.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [Patch] bridge: call NETDEV_ENSLAVE notifiers when adding a slave
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:04:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110519090411.1f039a88@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110519081213.15c05da2@nehalam>
On Thu, 19 May 2011 08:12:13 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2011 18:24:17 +0800
> Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > In the previous patch I added NETDEV_ENSLAVE, now
> > we can notify netconsole when adding a device to a bridge too.
> >
> > By the way, s/netdev_bonding_change/call_netdevice_notifiers/ in
> > bond_main.c, since this is not bonding specific.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>
> >
>
> Is there a usage for this? What listens for this notification?
Never mind it was in the first patch which you did not send.
You should always put a number on group of patches and send
to all parties.
Also, sending networking patches to LKML is a waste of bandwidth
please don't bother.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-19 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-18 10:00 [Patch net-next-2.6] netpoll: disable netpoll when enslave a device Amerigo Wang
2011-05-18 10:56 ` Neil Horman
2011-05-19 5:13 ` Cong Wang
2011-05-19 11:03 ` Neil Horman
2011-05-19 8:39 ` [V2 Patch " Amerigo Wang
2011-05-19 10:24 ` [Bridge] [Patch] bridge: call NETDEV_ENSLAVE notifiers when adding a slave Amerigo Wang
2011-05-19 10:24 ` Amerigo Wang
2011-05-19 15:12 ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-19 15:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-19 16:04 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2011-05-19 16:04 ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-20 3:06 ` Cong Wang
2011-05-20 3:06 ` Cong Wang
2011-05-19 11:31 ` [V2 Patch net-next-2.6] netpoll: disable netpoll when enslave a device Andy Gospodarek
2011-05-19 13:25 ` Neil Horman
2011-05-20 3:10 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110519090411.1f039a88@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.