From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Saeed Bishara <saeed@marvell.com>,
Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>,
Xiaobo Xie <X.Xie@freescale.com>,
Albert Herranz <albert_herranz@yahoo.es>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, sameo@linux.intel.com,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 19:05:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110519170548.GA1075@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110519160901.GC26816@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 784 bytes --]
Hi Shawn,
> Should I go for v3 right now to address the patch applying problems
> and that ESDHC_IMX build issue, or hold for a while to see if you
> have more comments on v2?
Please wait a little bit more.
> And what is your position on patch #5 which merges esdhc imx and mpc
> support into one? As Anton has voted a NO there, I would probably
> drop the patch if there is another person has strong opinion to get
> imx and mpc stay separated.
This was the other main issue I spotted so far. I wanted to have another look
tomorrow, yet the tendency is that I agree with Anton.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>,
sameo@linux.intel.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
patches@linaro.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Bishara <saeed@marvell.com>,
Xiaobo Xie <X.Xie@freescale.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Albert Herranz <albert_herranz@yahoo.es>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 19:05:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110519170548.GA1075@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110519160901.GC26816@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 784 bytes --]
Hi Shawn,
> Should I go for v3 right now to address the patch applying problems
> and that ESDHC_IMX build issue, or hold for a while to see if you
> have more comments on v2?
Please wait a little bit more.
> And what is your position on patch #5 which merges esdhc imx and mpc
> support into one? As Anton has voted a NO there, I would probably
> drop the patch if there is another person has strong opinion to get
> imx and mpc stay separated.
This was the other main issue I spotted so far. I wanted to have another look
tomorrow, yet the tendency is that I agree with Anton.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/7] Consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 19:05:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110519170548.GA1075@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110519160901.GC26816@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
Hi Shawn,
> Should I go for v3 right now to address the patch applying problems
> and that ESDHC_IMX build issue, or hold for a while to see if you
> have more comments on v2?
Please wait a little bit more.
> And what is your position on patch #5 which merges esdhc imx and mpc
> support into one? As Anton has voted a NO there, I would probably
> drop the patch if there is another person has strong opinion to get
> imx and mpc stay separated.
This was the other main issue I spotted so far. I wanted to have another look
tomorrow, yet the tendency is that I agree with Anton.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20110519/06e7724f/attachment-0001.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-19 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-05 13:22 [PATCH v2 0/7] Consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mmc: sdhci: make sdhci-pltfm device drivers " Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:24 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 14:24 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 14:24 ` Anton Vorontsov
[not found] ` <1304601778-13837-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mmc: sdhci: eliminate sdhci_of_host and sdhci_of_data Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:23 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 14:23 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 14:23 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-24 19:26 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-24 19:26 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-24 19:26 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mmc: sdhci: make sdhci-of device drivers self registered Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:23 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 14:23 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 14:23 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-06 2:15 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-06 2:15 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-06 2:15 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-24 19:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-24 19:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-24 19:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] sdhci: rename sdhci-esdhc-imx.c to sdhci-esdhc.c Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mmc: sdhci: consolidate sdhci-of-esdhc and sdhci-esdhc-imx Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:20 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 14:20 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 14:20 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-19 9:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-19 9:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-19 9:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-24 19:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-24 19:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-24 19:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-25 6:06 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-25 6:06 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-25 6:06 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-25 6:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-05-25 6:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-05-25 6:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-05-25 9:36 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-25 9:36 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-25 9:36 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mmc: sdhci: merge two sdhci-pltfm.h into one Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 14:13 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 14:13 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 14:13 ` Anton Vorontsov
2011-05-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ARM: mxc: remove esdhc.h and use the public one Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-05 13:22 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-06 8:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-05-06 8:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-05-06 8:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-05-09 6:23 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-09 6:23 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-09 6:23 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-19 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered Wolfram Sang
2011-05-19 9:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-19 9:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-19 16:09 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-19 16:09 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-19 16:09 ` Shawn Guo
2011-05-19 17:05 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2011-05-19 17:05 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-05-19 17:05 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110519170548.GA1075@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=X.Xie@freescale.com \
--cc=albert_herranz@yahoo.es \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mike@compulab.co.il \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=saeed@marvell.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shawn.guo@freescale.com \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.