All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com>,
	Kashyap Desai <Kashyap.Desai@lsi.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Ravi Anand <ravi.anand@qlogic.com>,
	Vikas Chaudhary <vikas.chaudhary@qlogic.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove 32-bit versions of readq()/writeq()
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:44:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110520114454.GD14745@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305849293-25437-1-git-send-email-roland@kernel.org>


* Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
> 
> The presense of a writeq() implementation on 32-bit x86 that splits
> the 64-bit write into two 32-bit writes turns out to break the mpt2sas
> driver (and in general is risky for drivers as was discussed in
> <http://lkml.kernel.org/r/adaab6c1h7c.fsf@cisco.com>).  To fix this,
> revert 2c5643b1c5c7 ("x86: provide readq()/writeq() on 32-bit too")
> and follow-on cleanups.
> 
> This unfortunately leads to pushing non-atomic definitions of readq()
> and write() to various x86-only drivers that in the mean time started
> using the definitions in the x86 version of <asm/io.h>.  However as
> discussed exhaustively, this is actually the right thing to do,
> because the right way to split a 64-bit transaction is hardware
> dependent and therefore belongs in the hardware driver (eg mpt2sas
> needs a spinlock to make sure no other accesses occur in between the
> two halves of the access).
> 
> Build tested on 32- and 64-bit x86 allmodconfig.
> 
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/x86-32-writeq-is-broken@mdm.bga.com
> Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com>
> Cc: Kashyap Desai <Kashyap.Desai@lsi.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ravi Anand <ravi.anand@qlogic.com>
> Cc: Vikas Chaudhary <vikas.chaudhary@qlogic.com>
> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                 |    2 --
>  arch/x86/include/asm/io.h        |   24 ++----------------------
>  drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c         |    8 ++++++++
>  drivers/acpi/atomicio.c          |    4 ++++
>  drivers/edac/i3200_edac.c        |   13 +++++++++++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/ibm_rtl.c   |   13 +++++++++++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel_ips.c |   13 +++++++++++++
>  drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_nx.c    |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  8 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

Hm, this patch is wider than i thought - might be better to do this via one of 
the driver trees or -mm?

The x86 bits are:

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-20 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-04 11:53 [PATCH 1/3] mpt2sas: remove the use of writeq, since writeq is not atomic Kashyap, Desai
2011-05-17  7:16 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-18  4:07   ` Desai, Kashyap
2011-05-18  4:15     ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-05-18  4:15       ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-05-18  4:23       ` James Bottomley
2011-05-18  4:23         ` James Bottomley
2011-05-18  7:00         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-18  7:00           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-18  8:23           ` Milton Miller
2011-05-18  8:23             ` Milton Miller
2011-05-18 15:35             ` Moore, Eric
2011-05-18 15:35               ` Moore, Eric
2011-05-18 18:31               ` Milton Miller
2011-05-18 18:31                 ` Milton Miller
2011-05-18 18:31                 ` Milton Miller
2011-05-18 19:11                 ` Moore, Eric
2011-05-18 19:11                   ` Moore, Eric
2011-05-18 19:11                   ` Moore, Eric
2011-05-19  4:08                   ` Hitoshi Mitake
2011-05-19  4:08                     ` Hitoshi Mitake
2011-05-19  4:46                     ` James Bottomley
2011-05-19  4:46                       ` James Bottomley
2011-05-19  5:36                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-19  5:36                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-19  8:35                       ` [PATCH 1/3] mpt2sas: remove the use of writeq, since writeq isnot atomic David Laight
2011-05-19  8:35                         ` David Laight
2011-05-19  8:35                         ` David Laight
2011-05-19  4:16                 ` [PATCH 1/3] mpt2sas: remove the use of writeq, since writeq is not atomic Roland Dreier
2011-05-19  4:16                   ` Roland Dreier
2011-05-19  5:34                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-19  5:34                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-19 18:15                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-19 18:15                       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-19 23:54                       ` [PATCH] x86: Remove 32-bit versions of readq()/writeq() Roland Dreier
2011-05-20  1:15                         ` Hitoshi Mitake
2011-05-20  8:05                           ` Desai, Kashyap
2011-05-20 11:44                         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-05-20 12:03                           ` James Bottomley
2011-05-18 21:30               ` [PATCH 1/3] mpt2sas: remove the use of writeq, since writeq is not atomic Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-18 22:05                 ` Moore, Eric
2011-05-18 22:05                   ` Moore, Eric
2011-05-18  8:04         ` [PATCH 1/3] mpt2sas: remove the use of writeq, since writeq isnot atomic David Laight
2011-05-18  8:04           ` David Laight
2011-05-18  5:45       ` [PATCH 1/3] mpt2sas: remove the use of writeq, since writeq is not atomic Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-18  5:45         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110520114454.GD14745@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=Kashyap.Desai@lsi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=h.mitake@gmail.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miltonm@bga.com \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ravi.anand@qlogic.com \
    --cc=roland@kernel.org \
    --cc=vikas.chaudhary@qlogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.