All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Subject: Re: KVM: x86: use proper port value when checking io instruction permission (v2)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 12:02:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110526090230.GH29458@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DDE16A8.40108@redhat.com>

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:00:24AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 10:26 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >Why would c->dst.bytes != c->src.bytes for cwd/cdq/cqo if we'll set
> >c->dst.bytes to op_bytes during decode?
> 
> Duh, you're right, cwd/cdq/cqo uses SrcAcc which has
> 
>                 c->src.bytes = (c->d & ByteOp) ? 1 : c->op_bytes;
> 
> so in practice c->src.bytes = c->op_bytes.
> 
> I still find it confusing that DstDX would use c->op_bytes without
> honoring ByteOp unlike pretty much everything else; but yes, there
> is a possible use of DstDX outside in/out.
> 
We can make it honor ByteOp. There will be no instruction that will
specify DstDX | ByteOp though.

--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-26  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-24 17:11 KVM: x86: use proper port value when checking io instruction permission Marcelo Tosatti
2011-05-24 17:27 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-24 19:07   ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-24 19:18     ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-24 19:25       ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-25 18:18   ` KVM: x86: use proper port value when checking io instruction permission (v2) Marcelo Tosatti
2011-05-26  6:31     ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-26  6:55       ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-26  7:02         ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-26  7:04           ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-26  7:07             ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-26  7:49               ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-26  8:26                 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-26  9:00                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-26  9:02                     ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2011-05-26  9:23                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-26  9:29                         ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-26 10:43                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-05-26 11:56       ` KVM: x86: use proper port value when checking io instruction permission (v3) Marcelo Tosatti
2011-05-29  8:34         ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-30 18:23           ` KVM: x86: use proper port value when checking io instruction permission (v4) Marcelo Tosatti
2011-05-30 18:28             ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-30 18:23           ` KVM: x86: use proper port value when checking io instruction permission (v3) Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110526090230.GH29458@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.