All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kees.cook@canonical.com,
	davej@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	adobriyan@gmail.com, eranian@google.com, penberg@kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	pageexec@freemail.hu, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Randomize kernel base address on boot
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:51:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110531185122.GA11998@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DE5360D.5070809@zytor.com>

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:40:13AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 09:52 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > The BIOS E820 map, or the kernel representation? In either case, this 
> > isn't going to work well with EFI. There are regions that will be marked 
> > as available in the E820 map that we *mustn't* touch until we've entered 
> > EFI virtual mode.
> > 
> > (This is, clearly, insane).
> > 
> 
> I believe we could (should!) mark them reserved, not available, in the
> E820 map and free them later.

That was my original approach, but it requires that the bootloader be 
modified and it turns out that it's a lot harder to hand reserved 
regions back to the OS than it is to just reserve it in-kernel. The 
complete inflexibility of e820 is massively unhelpful here. It's just 
not possible to represent all of the EFI memory map data in it.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-31 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-24 20:31 [RFC][PATCH] Randomize kernel base address on boot Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-24 21:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-24 22:55   ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-24 21:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-24 23:00   ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-25 11:23     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 14:20       ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-25 14:29         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-24 23:06   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-25 14:03     ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-25 14:14       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 15:48       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-25 16:15         ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-25 16:24           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-24 21:46 ` Brian Gerst
2011-05-24 23:01   ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-24 22:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-24 23:04   ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-24 23:07     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-24 23:34       ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-24 23:36         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-24 23:14   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-24 23:08 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-25  2:05   ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-26 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-26 20:06   ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-26 20:16   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-26 20:31     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-27  9:36       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 20:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-26 20:40   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-26 20:44     ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-26 20:55       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-27  9:38         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 13:07           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-27 13:38             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 13:13       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-27 13:21         ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-27 13:46           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 13:50           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-26 20:39 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-27  7:15   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-31 16:52   ` Matthew Garrett
2011-05-31 18:40     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-31 18:51       ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2011-05-31 19:03         ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-31 19:07           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-31 19:50           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-31 19:55           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-31 20:15             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-31 20:27               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-31 20:30                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-01  6:18                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-01 15:44                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-31 20:17             ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-26 22:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-26 22:32   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-27  0:26     ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-27 16:21       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-27  2:45     ` Dave Jones
2011-05-27  9:40       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 16:11         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-27 16:07     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-27 15:42   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-27 16:11     ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-27 17:00     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 17:06       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-27 17:10       ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-27 17:13         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-27 17:16           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-27 17:38             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 17:20           ` Kees Cook
2011-05-27 17:16         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 17:21           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-27 17:46             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 17:53               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-27 18:05                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-27 19:15                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-27 21:37                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-27 23:51                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-28 12:18                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-29  1:13                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-29 12:47                       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-29 18:19                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-29 18:44                           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-29 18:52                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-29 19:56                               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 17:57               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-27 18:17                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 18:43                   ` Kees Cook
2011-05-27 18:48                   ` david
2011-05-27 21:51                   ` Olivier Galibert
2011-05-27 22:11                     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-28  0:50                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-28  6:32                     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110531185122.GA11998@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=drosenberg@vsecurity.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pageexec@freemail.hu \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.