All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kees.cook@canonical.com,
	davej@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	adobriyan@gmail.com, eranian@google.com, penberg@kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	pageexec@freemail.hu, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Randomize kernel base address on boot
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 12:07:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DE53C80.3070406@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306868609.6317.25.camel@dan>

On 05/31/2011 12:03 PM, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
> 
> Just for the record, I've put this patch on hold until there's some more
> consensus about whether boot-time randomization of the physical kernel
> address is the best approach.  There are some other potential issues
> that haven't been brought up yet publicly, such as the possibility of
> local attackers performing cache timing attacks to find the kernel image
> location at runtime, which may make traditional ASLR somewhat pointless
> regardless (except in the case of remote attackers, I suppose).  Perhaps
> HPA's suggestion of further modularizing the kernel would have some
> advantages in this regard.
> 

I'm probably going to implement the whole-image randomization as an
option in the Syslinux bootloader; it is a *lot* easier to do this
correctly in the bootloader.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-31 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-24 20:31 [RFC][PATCH] Randomize kernel base address on boot Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-24 21:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-24 22:55   ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-24 21:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-24 23:00   ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-25 11:23     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 14:20       ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-25 14:29         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-24 23:06   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-25 14:03     ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-25 14:14       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 15:48       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-25 16:15         ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-25 16:24           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-24 21:46 ` Brian Gerst
2011-05-24 23:01   ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-24 22:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-24 23:04   ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-24 23:07     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-24 23:34       ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-24 23:36         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-24 23:14   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-24 23:08 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-25  2:05   ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-26 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-26 20:06   ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-26 20:16   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-26 20:31     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-27  9:36       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 20:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-26 20:40   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-26 20:44     ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-26 20:55       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-27  9:38         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 13:07           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-27 13:38             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 13:13       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-27 13:21         ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-27 13:46           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 13:50           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-26 20:39 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-27  7:15   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-31 16:52   ` Matthew Garrett
2011-05-31 18:40     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-31 18:51       ` Matthew Garrett
2011-05-31 19:03         ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-31 19:07           ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-05-31 19:50           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-31 19:55           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-31 20:15             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-31 20:27               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-31 20:30                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-01  6:18                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-01 15:44                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-31 20:17             ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-26 22:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-26 22:32   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-27  0:26     ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-27 16:21       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-27  2:45     ` Dave Jones
2011-05-27  9:40       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 16:11         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-27 16:07     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-27 15:42   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-27 16:11     ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-27 17:00     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 17:06       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-27 17:10       ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-27 17:13         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-27 17:16           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-27 17:38             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 17:20           ` Kees Cook
2011-05-27 17:16         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 17:21           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-27 17:46             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 17:53               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-27 18:05                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-27 19:15                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-27 21:37                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-27 23:51                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-28 12:18                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-29  1:13                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-29 12:47                       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-29 18:19                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-29 18:44                           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-29 18:52                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-29 19:56                               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 17:57               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-27 18:17                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 18:43                   ` Kees Cook
2011-05-27 18:48                   ` david
2011-05-27 21:51                   ` Olivier Galibert
2011-05-27 22:11                     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-28  0:50                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-28  6:32                     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DE53C80.3070406@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=drosenberg@vsecurity.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pageexec@freemail.hu \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.