From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, cjb@laptop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
madhu.cr@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: OMAP4: MMC: increase delay for pbias
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:49:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110601114929.GB11352@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306926923-3398-2-git-send-email-balajitk@ti.com>
* Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com> [110601 04:13]:
> 4 micro seconds is not enough for PBIAS if MMC regulator is
> enabled from MMC regulator OFF.
> Increase the delay for PBIAS to stabilize.
> Wait for PBIAS and timeout if not.
>
> Resolves MMC/SD failure on OMAP4
> "Pbias Voltage is not same as LDO"
Thanks for updating this, applying to devel-fixes.
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: OMAP4: MMC: increase delay for pbias
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:49:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110601114929.GB11352@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306926923-3398-2-git-send-email-balajitk@ti.com>
* Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com> [110601 04:13]:
> 4 micro seconds is not enough for PBIAS if MMC regulator is
> enabled from MMC regulator OFF.
> Increase the delay for PBIAS to stabilize.
> Wait for PBIAS and timeout if not.
>
> Resolves MMC/SD failure on OMAP4
> "Pbias Voltage is not same as LDO"
Thanks for updating this, applying to devel-fixes.
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-01 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-01 11:15 [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: OMAP4: fix MMC failure due to regulator enable/disable ops Balaji T K
2011-06-01 11:15 ` Balaji T K
2011-06-01 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: OMAP4: MMC: increase delay for pbias Balaji T K
2011-06-01 11:15 ` Balaji T K
2011-06-01 11:49 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-06-01 11:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-01 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: OMAP4: MMC: no regulator off during probe for eMMC Balaji T K
2011-06-01 11:15 ` Balaji T K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110601114929.GB11352@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=balajitk@ti.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madhu.cr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.