From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ury Stankevich <urykhy@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: Abort compaction if too many pages are isolated and caller is asynchronous
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:40:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110601214018.GC7306@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110601191529.GY19505@random.random>
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 09:15:29PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 06:58:09PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Umm, HIGHMEM4G implies a two-level pagetable layout so where are
> > things like _PAGE_BIT_SPLITTING being set when THP is enabled?
>
> They should be set on the pgd, pud_offset/pgd_offset will just bypass.
> The splitting bit shouldn't be special about it, the present bit
> should work the same.
This comment is misleading at best then.
#define _PAGE_BIT_SPLITTING _PAGE_BIT_UNUSED1 /* only valid on a PSE pmd */
At the PGD level, it can have PSE set obviously but it's not a
PMD. I confess I haven't checked the manual to see if it's safe to
use _PAGE_BIT_UNUSED1 like this so am taking your word for it. I
found that the bug is far harder to reproduce with 3 pagetable levels
than with 2 but that is just timing. So far it has proven impossible
on x86-64 at least within 27 hours so that has me looking at how
pagetable management between x86 and x86-64 differ.
Barriers are a big different between how 32-bit !SMP and X86-64 but
don't know yet which one is relevant or if this is even the right
direction.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ury Stankevich <urykhy@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: Abort compaction if too many pages are isolated and caller is asynchronous
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:40:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110601214018.GC7306@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110601191529.GY19505@random.random>
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 09:15:29PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 06:58:09PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Umm, HIGHMEM4G implies a two-level pagetable layout so where are
> > things like _PAGE_BIT_SPLITTING being set when THP is enabled?
>
> They should be set on the pgd, pud_offset/pgd_offset will just bypass.
> The splitting bit shouldn't be special about it, the present bit
> should work the same.
This comment is misleading at best then.
#define _PAGE_BIT_SPLITTING _PAGE_BIT_UNUSED1 /* only valid on a PSE pmd */
At the PGD level, it can have PSE set obviously but it's not a
PMD. I confess I haven't checked the manual to see if it's safe to
use _PAGE_BIT_UNUSED1 like this so am taking your word for it. I
found that the bug is far harder to reproduce with 3 pagetable levels
than with 2 but that is just timing. So far it has proven impossible
on x86-64 at least within 27 hours so that has me looking at how
pagetable management between x86 and x86-64 differ.
Barriers are a big different between how 32-bit !SMP and X86-64 but
don't know yet which one is relevant or if this is even the right
direction.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-01 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-30 13:13 [PATCH] mm: compaction: Abort compaction if too many pages are isolated and caller is asynchronous Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 13:13 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 14:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-30 14:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-30 15:37 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 15:37 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 16:55 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 16:55 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 17:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-30 17:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-31 12:16 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 12:16 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 12:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-31 12:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-31 13:33 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 13:33 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 14:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-31 14:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-31 14:37 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 14:37 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 14:38 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 14:38 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 18:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 18:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 20:21 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 20:21 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 20:59 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 20:59 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 22:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 22:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 21:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 21:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 22:23 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 22:23 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 22:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 22:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 23:01 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 23:01 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-03 17:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-03 17:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-03 18:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-03 18:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-04 7:59 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-04 7:59 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 10:32 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 10:32 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 12:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-06 12:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-06 14:47 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 14:47 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 14:07 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 14:07 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 10:15 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 10:15 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 10:26 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 10:26 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 14:01 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 14:01 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 14:26 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 14:26 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 23:02 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 23:02 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-01 0:57 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-01 0:57 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-01 9:24 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-01 9:24 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-01 17:58 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-01 17:58 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-01 19:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-01 19:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-01 21:40 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2011-06-01 21:40 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-01 23:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-01 23:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 1:03 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-02 1:03 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-02 8:34 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 8:34 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-02 13:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 13:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 14:50 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-02 14:50 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-02 15:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 15:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-03 2:09 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-03 2:09 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-03 14:49 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-03 14:49 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-03 15:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-03 15:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-04 7:25 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-04 7:25 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 10:39 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 10:39 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 12:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-06 12:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-06 14:55 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 14:55 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 14:19 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 14:19 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-06 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-04 6:58 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-04 6:58 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 10:43 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 10:43 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-06 12:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-06 12:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-06 13:27 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 13:27 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 13:23 ` Minchan Kim
2011-06-06 13:23 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 14:34 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-31 14:34 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-30 14:45 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2011-05-30 14:45 ` Greg KH
2011-05-30 16:14 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-30 16:14 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 8:32 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-31 8:32 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-31 4:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-31 4:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-31 5:38 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 5:38 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-31 7:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31 7:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110601214018.GC7306@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=urykhy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.