From: Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Izik Eidus <ieidus@redhat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG 3.0.0-rc1] ksm: NULL pointer dereference in ksm_do_scan()
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:10:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110602201048.GA4114@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110602164841.GK23047@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:48:41AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Andrea Righi (andrea@betterlinux.com) wrote:
> > mmh.. I can reproduce the bug also with the standard ubuntu (11.04)
> > kernel. Could you post your .config?
>
> Andrea (Righi), can you tell me if this WARN fires? This looks
> like a pure race between removing from list and checking list, i.e.
> insufficient locking.
Yes, it does. With this patch:
[ 50.968896] WARNING: at mm/ksm.c:1305 ksm_scan_thread+0x9e3/0xe50()
>
> ksm_scan.mm_slot == the only registered mm
>
> CPU 1 (bug program) CPU 2 (ksmd)
> list_empty() is false
> lock
> ksm_scan.mm_slot
> list_del
> unlock
> slot == &ksm_mm_head (but list is now empty_)
It seems to be the exact problem.
-Andrea
>
>
> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
> index 942dfc7..ab79a92 100644
> --- a/mm/ksm.c
> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
> @@ -1301,6 +1301,7 @@ static struct rmap_item *scan_get_next_rmap_item(struct page **page)
> slot = list_entry(slot->mm_list.next, struct mm_slot, mm_list);
> ksm_scan.mm_slot = slot;
> spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
> + WARN_ON(slot == &ksm_mm_head);
> next_mm:
> ksm_scan.address = 0;
> ksm_scan.rmap_list = &slot->rmap_list;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Izik Eidus <ieidus@redhat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG 3.0.0-rc1] ksm: NULL pointer dereference in ksm_do_scan()
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:10:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110602201048.GA4114@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110602164841.GK23047@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:48:41AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Andrea Righi (andrea@betterlinux.com) wrote:
> > mmh.. I can reproduce the bug also with the standard ubuntu (11.04)
> > kernel. Could you post your .config?
>
> Andrea (Righi), can you tell me if this WARN fires? This looks
> like a pure race between removing from list and checking list, i.e.
> insufficient locking.
Yes, it does. With this patch:
[ 50.968896] WARNING: at mm/ksm.c:1305 ksm_scan_thread+0x9e3/0xe50()
>
> ksm_scan.mm_slot == the only registered mm
>
> CPU 1 (bug program) CPU 2 (ksmd)
> list_empty() is false
> lock
> ksm_scan.mm_slot
> list_del
> unlock
> slot == &ksm_mm_head (but list is now empty_)
It seems to be the exact problem.
-Andrea
>
>
> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
> index 942dfc7..ab79a92 100644
> --- a/mm/ksm.c
> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
> @@ -1301,6 +1301,7 @@ static struct rmap_item *scan_get_next_rmap_item(struct page **page)
> slot = list_entry(slot->mm_list.next, struct mm_slot, mm_list);
> ksm_scan.mm_slot = slot;
> spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
> + WARN_ON(slot == &ksm_mm_head);
> next_mm:
> ksm_scan.address = 0;
> ksm_scan.rmap_list = &slot->rmap_list;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-02 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-01 22:20 [BUG 3.0.0-rc1] ksm: NULL pointer dereference in ksm_do_scan() Andrea Righi
2011-06-01 22:20 ` Andrea Righi
2011-06-02 1:53 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-02 1:53 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-02 7:09 ` CAI Qian
2011-06-02 7:09 ` CAI Qian
2011-06-02 14:19 ` Andrea Righi
2011-06-02 14:19 ` Andrea Righi
2011-06-02 16:48 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-02 16:48 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-02 17:29 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-06-02 17:29 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-06-02 17:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 17:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-03 17:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-06-03 17:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-06-03 18:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-03 18:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 17:35 ` [PATCH] ksm: fix race between ksmd and exiting task Chris Wright
2011-06-02 17:35 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-02 20:12 ` Andrea Righi
2011-06-02 20:12 ` Andrea Righi
2011-06-02 21:23 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-02 21:23 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-03 16:37 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-06-03 16:37 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-06-04 0:54 ` [PATCH] ksm: fix NULL pointer dereference in scan_get_next_rmap_item Chris Wright
2011-06-04 0:54 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-02 20:10 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2011-06-02 20:10 ` [BUG 3.0.0-rc1] ksm: NULL pointer dereference in ksm_do_scan() Andrea Righi
2011-06-03 4:42 ` CAI Qian
2011-06-03 4:42 ` CAI Qian
2011-06-02 14:31 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-02 14:31 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-02 14:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 14:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 15:36 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-02 15:36 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-02 16:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 16:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 20:15 ` Andrea Righi
2011-06-02 20:15 ` Andrea Righi
2011-06-02 21:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-02 21:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-03 4:50 ` CAI Qian
2011-06-03 4:50 ` CAI Qian
2011-06-03 4:44 ` CAI Qian
2011-06-03 4:44 ` CAI Qian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110602201048.GA4114@thinkpad \
--to=andrea@betterlinux.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=caiqian@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ieidus@redhat.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.