From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: RCU-protect __set_task_cpu() in set_task_cpu()
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:46:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110606164657.GA20752@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307351198.2353.7415.camel@twins>
On 06/06, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> You're right, p->pi_lock for wakeups, rq->lock for runnable tasks.
Good, thanks.
Help! I have another question.
try_to_wake_up:
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
if (!(p->state & state))
goto out;
cpu = task_cpu(p);
if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags))
goto stat;
This doesn't look a bit confusing, we can't trust "cpu = task_cpu" before
we check ->on_rq. OK, not a problem, this cpu number can only be used in
ttwu_stat(cpu).
But ttwu_stat(cpu) in turn does
if (cpu != task_cpu(p))
schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_wakeups_migrate);
Ignoring the theoretical races with pull_task/etc, how it is possible
that cpu != task_cpu(p) ? Another caller is try_to_wake_up_local(), it
obviously can't trigger this case.
This looks broken to me. Looking at its name, I guess nr_wakeups_migrate
should be incremented if ttwu does set_task_cpu(), correct?
IOW. Don't we need something like the (untested/ucompiled) patch below?
_If_ I am right, I can resend it with the changelog/etc but please feel
free to make another fix.
Oleg.
--- x/kernel/sched.c
+++ x/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2423,13 +2423,14 @@ static void update_avg(u64 *avg, u64 sam
#endif
static void
-ttwu_stat(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags)
+ttwu_stat(struct task_struct *p, bool migrate, int wake_flags)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
struct rq *rq = this_rq();
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ int cpu = task_cpu(p);
if (cpu == this_cpu) {
schedstat_inc(rq, ttwu_local);
@@ -2455,7 +2456,7 @@ ttwu_stat(struct task_struct *p, int cpu
if (wake_flags & WF_SYNC)
schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_wakeups_sync);
- if (cpu != task_cpu(p))
+ if (migrate)
schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_wakeups_migrate);
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS */
@@ -2630,6 +2631,7 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
{
unsigned long flags;
int cpu, success = 0;
+ bool migrate = false;
smp_wmb();
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
@@ -2637,7 +2639,6 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
goto out;
success = 1; /* we're going to change ->state */
- cpu = task_cpu(p);
if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags))
goto stat;
@@ -2674,13 +2675,15 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
p->sched_class->task_waking(p);
cpu = select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_WAKE, wake_flags);
- if (task_cpu(p) != cpu)
+ if (task_cpu(p) != cpu) {
set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
+ migrate = true;
+ }
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
ttwu_queue(p, cpu);
stat:
- ttwu_stat(p, cpu, wake_flags);
+ ttwu_stat(p, migrate, wake_flags);
out:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
@@ -2716,7 +2719,7 @@ static void try_to_wake_up_local(struct
ttwu_activate(rq, p, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
ttwu_do_wakeup(rq, p, 0);
- ttwu_stat(p, smp_processor_id(), 0);
+ ttwu_stat(p, false, 0);
out:
raw_spin_unlock(&p->pi_lock);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-06 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-31 17:26 [PATCH] sched: RCU-protect __set_task_cpu() in set_task_cpu() Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-05-31 19:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-03 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-03 18:16 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-06-03 22:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2011-06-05 19:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-06 9:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 16:46 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-06-07 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-07 14:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-06 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-07 12:03 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix/clarify set_task_cpu() locking rules tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110606164657.GA20752@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.