All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm: omap3: cm-t35: add support for cm-t3730
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 06:33:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110613133307.GC3352@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DE8E3B7.5020107@compulab.co.il>

* Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il> [110603 06:33]:
> 
> I'm not sure I understand what are you trying to propose here...
> If you look once again on the code, there is currently only one if (cpu_is_..) {} else {}
> statement currently present.
> (I can remove the "if (cpu_is_omap3630())" - it indeed has no value)
>
> Indeed, there will be some other differences...
> Each time I submit a patch, I try to be as optimal as I can,
> but again I'm open for suggestions...
> (though I think it is optimal, e.g. 33 lines for a new running board...)

What I meant is that maybe you should do the detection first in some
get_revision function and populate the gpio pins there. Sort of like
this recent beagle patch:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/859662/

That way adding support for other differences will be easier.

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] arm: omap3: cm-t35: add support for cm-t3730
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 06:33:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110613133307.GC3352@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DE8E3B7.5020107@compulab.co.il>

* Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il> [110603 06:33]:
> 
> I'm not sure I understand what are you trying to propose here...
> If you look once again on the code, there is currently only one if (cpu_is_..) {} else {}
> statement currently present.
> (I can remove the "if (cpu_is_omap3630())" - it indeed has no value)
>
> Indeed, there will be some other differences...
> Each time I submit a patch, I try to be as optimal as I can,
> but again I'm open for suggestions...
> (though I think it is optimal, e.g. 33 lines for a new running board...)

What I meant is that maybe you should do the detection first in some
get_revision function and populate the gpio pins there. Sort of like
this recent beagle patch:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/859662/

That way adding support for other differences will be easier.

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-13 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-05  8:53 [PATCH] arm: omap3: cm-t35: add support for cm-t3730 Igor Grinberg
2011-05-05  8:53 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-05-05  9:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2011-05-05  9:51   ` Mike Rapoport
2011-05-08  7:20   ` [PATCH v2] " Igor Grinberg
2011-05-08  7:20     ` Igor Grinberg
2011-05-31 13:04     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-05-31 13:04       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-03 13:37       ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-03 13:37         ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-13 13:33         ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-06-13 13:33           ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-13 19:34           ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-13 19:34             ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-14  7:36             ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-14  7:36               ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-14 21:16               ` [PATCH 1/3] arm: omap3: cm-t35: minor comments fixes Igor Grinberg
2011-06-14 21:16                 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-14 21:16               ` [PATCH 2/3] arm: omap3: cm-t35: fix slow path warning Igor Grinberg
2011-06-14 21:16                 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-14 21:16               ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm: omap3: cm-t35: add support for cm-t3730 Igor Grinberg
2011-06-14 21:16                 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-22 14:56                 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-22 14:56                   ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-27  8:35                   ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-27  8:35                     ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-27 10:21                     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-27 10:21                       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-06-27 12:31                       ` Igor Grinberg
2011-06-27 12:31                         ` Igor Grinberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110613133307.GC3352@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.