From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] serial/imx: add device tree support
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:11:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201106182011.33146.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110618162655.GK8195@ponder.secretlab.ca>
On Saturday 18 June 2011 18:26:55 Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 06:21:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Should this also support the "clock-frequency" property that 8250-style
> > serial ports support [1]?
> >
> > For the flow-control properties, should we name that more generic? The
> > same property certainly makes sense for other serial-ports if it does
> > here. OTOH, I'm not sure it's actually reliable, because it also depends
> > on whether the other side of the connection and the cable support hw flow
> > control.
>
> I'd like to see a few use cases before defining a common property.
> That said, has-rts-cts does sound like a useful generic property.
> Or maybe named "uart-has-rts-cts" to make it clear that it is a uart
> specific binding?
>
Sounds ok to me.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
patches@linaro.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Jason Liu <jason.hui@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] serial/imx: add device tree support
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:11:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201106182011.33146.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110618162655.GK8195@ponder.secretlab.ca>
On Saturday 18 June 2011 18:26:55 Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 06:21:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Should this also support the "clock-frequency" property that 8250-style
> > serial ports support [1]?
> >
> > For the flow-control properties, should we name that more generic? The
> > same property certainly makes sense for other serial-ports if it does
> > here. OTOH, I'm not sure it's actually reliable, because it also depends
> > on whether the other side of the connection and the cable support hw flow
> > control.
>
> I'd like to see a few use cases before defining a common property.
> That said, has-rts-cts does sound like a useful generic property.
> Or maybe named "uart-has-rts-cts" to make it clear that it is a uart
> specific binding?
>
Sounds ok to me.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Cc: patches-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Jason Liu <jason.hui-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr-Z7WLFzj8eWMS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] serial/imx: add device tree support
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:11:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201106182011.33146.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110618162655.GK8195-e0URQFbLeQY2iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
On Saturday 18 June 2011 18:26:55 Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 06:21:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Should this also support the "clock-frequency" property that 8250-style
> > serial ports support [1]?
> >
> > For the flow-control properties, should we name that more generic? The
> > same property certainly makes sense for other serial-ports if it does
> > here. OTOH, I'm not sure it's actually reliable, because it also depends
> > on whether the other side of the connection and the cable support hw flow
> > control.
>
> I'd like to see a few use cases before defining a common property.
> That said, has-rts-cts does sound like a useful generic property.
> Or maybe named "uart-has-rts-cts" to make it clear that it is a uart
> specific binding?
>
Sounds ok to me.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-18 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-18 15:19 [PATCH 0/3] Add basic device support for imx51 babbage Shawn Guo
2011-06-18 15:19 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-18 15:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] serial/imx: add device tree support Shawn Guo
2011-06-18 15:19 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-18 15:19 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-18 16:19 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-18 16:19 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-18 16:19 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-19 7:02 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-06-19 7:02 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-06-19 7:30 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-19 7:30 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-19 7:30 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-19 15:05 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-19 15:05 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-19 15:15 ` Rob Herring
2011-06-19 15:15 ` Rob Herring
2011-06-19 18:44 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-19 18:44 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 13:55 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-21 13:55 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-21 13:55 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-21 18:32 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-06-21 18:32 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-06-21 18:32 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-06-21 18:42 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 18:42 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 18:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 18:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 19:02 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 19:02 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 19:02 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 19:04 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-06-21 19:04 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-06-21 19:04 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-06-21 19:13 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 19:13 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 19:35 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-06-21 19:35 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-06-21 19:35 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-06-21 19:38 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 19:38 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 22:08 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-06-21 22:08 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-06-21 22:08 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-06-21 22:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 22:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 22:52 ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-06-21 22:52 ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-06-21 22:52 ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-06-21 22:58 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 22:58 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-21 22:58 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-22 15:33 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-22 15:33 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-22 15:33 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-22 15:52 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-22 15:52 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-23 0:12 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-23 0:12 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-23 0:12 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-23 3:35 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-23 3:35 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-23 3:35 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-23 18:38 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-23 18:38 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-23 18:38 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-23 23:11 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-23 23:11 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-24 3:49 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-24 3:49 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-24 3:49 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-24 4:05 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-24 4:05 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-24 4:05 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-18 16:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-18 16:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-18 16:26 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-18 16:26 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-18 16:26 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-18 18:11 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-06-18 18:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-18 18:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-19 7:41 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-19 7:41 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-19 7:41 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-19 7:40 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-19 7:40 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-19 7:40 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-18 15:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] net/fec: " Shawn Guo
2011-06-18 15:19 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-18 15:19 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-18 16:22 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-18 16:22 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-19 7:46 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-19 7:46 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-19 7:46 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-18 18:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-18 18:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-18 18:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-19 0:24 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-19 0:24 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-19 0:24 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-19 7:55 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-19 7:55 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-19 7:55 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-19 11:39 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-06-19 11:39 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-06-19 11:39 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-06-19 12:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-19 12:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-19 15:09 ` Rob Herring
2011-06-19 15:09 ` Rob Herring
2011-06-19 18:43 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-19 18:43 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-20 0:05 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-06-20 0:05 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-06-20 0:05 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-06-18 15:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: mx5: add basic device tree support for imx51 babbage Shawn Guo
2011-06-18 15:19 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-18 15:19 ` Shawn Guo
2011-06-18 16:24 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-18 16:24 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-18 16:24 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-18 16:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] Add basic device " Grant Likely
2011-06-18 16:29 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-18 16:29 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201106182011.33146.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.