[PATCH/RFC] dma: shdma: transfer based runtime PM

[PATCH/RFC] dma: shdma: transfer based runtime PM

[Guennadi Liakhovetski]

Currently the shdma dmaengine driver uses runtime PM to save power, when
no channel on the specific controller is requested by a user. This patch
switches the driver to count individual DMA transfers. That way the
controller can be powered down between transfers, even if some of its
channels are in use.

Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
---

I marked this an RFC, because it might make sense to first test it with 
Rafael's upcoming power-domain code for sh-mobile, before committing.

 drivers/dma/shdma.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++------------
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/shdma.c b/drivers/dma/shdma.c
index 6eb8454..94d78f2 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/shdma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/shdma.c
@@ -235,10 +235,22 @@ static dma_cookie_t sh_dmae_tx_submit(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx)
 	struct sh_desc *desc = tx_to_sh_desc(tx), *chunk, *last = desc, *c;
 	struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan = to_sh_chan(tx->chan);
 	dma_async_tx_callback callback = tx->callback;
+	struct sh_dmae_slave *param = tx->chan->private;
 	dma_cookie_t cookie;
 
+	pm_runtime_get_sync(sh_chan->dev);
+
 	spin_lock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
 
+	if (param) {
+		const struct sh_dmae_slave_config *cfg = param->config;
+
+		dmae_set_dmars(sh_chan, cfg->mid_rid);
+		dmae_set_chcr(sh_chan, cfg->chcr);
+	} else {
+		dmae_init(sh_chan);
+	}
+
 	cookie = sh_chan->common.cookie;
 	cookie++;
 	if (cookie < 0)
@@ -319,8 +331,6 @@ static int sh_dmae_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
 	struct sh_dmae_slave *param = chan->private;
 	int ret;
 
-	pm_runtime_get_sync(sh_chan->dev);
-
 	/*
 	 * This relies on the guarantee from dmaengine that alloc_chan_resources
 	 * never runs concurrently with itself or free_chan_resources.
@@ -340,11 +350,6 @@ static int sh_dmae_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
 		}
 
 		param->config = cfg;
-
-		dmae_set_dmars(sh_chan, cfg->mid_rid);
-		dmae_set_chcr(sh_chan, cfg->chcr);
-	} else {
-		dmae_init(sh_chan);
 	}
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
@@ -378,7 +383,6 @@ edescalloc:
 		clear_bit(param->slave_id, sh_dmae_slave_used);
 etestused:
 efindslave:
-	pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -390,7 +394,6 @@ static void sh_dmae_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
 	struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan = to_sh_chan(chan);
 	struct sh_desc *desc, *_desc;
 	LIST_HEAD(list);
-	int descs = sh_chan->descs_allocated;
 
 	/* Protect against ISR */
 	spin_lock_irq(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
@@ -417,9 +420,6 @@ static void sh_dmae_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
 
 	spin_unlock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
 
-	if (descs > 0)
-		pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
-
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _desc, &list, node)
 		kfree(desc);
 }
@@ -735,6 +735,9 @@ static dma_async_tx_callback __ld_cleanup(struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan, bool all
 		     async_tx_test_ack(&desc->async_tx)) || all) {
 			/* Remove from ld_queue list */
 			desc->mark = DESC_IDLE;
+
+			if (tx->cookie > 0)
+				pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
 			list_move(&desc->node, &sh_chan->ld_free);
 		}
 	}
@@ -894,6 +897,7 @@ static bool sh_dmae_reset(struct sh_dmae_device *shdev)
 			desc->mark = DESC_IDLE;
 			if (tx->callback)
 				tx->callback(tx->callback_param);
+			pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
 		}
 
 		spin_lock(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
-- 
1.7.2.5

Re: [PATCH/RFC] dma: shdma: transfer based runtime PM

[Koul, Vinod]

On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:50 +0530, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Currently the shdma dmaengine driver uses runtime PM to save power, when
> no channel on the specific controller is requested by a user. This patch
> switches the driver to count individual DMA transfers. That way the
> controller can be powered down between transfers, even if some of its
> channels are in use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
> ---
> 
> I marked this an RFC, because it might make sense to first test it with 
> Rafael's upcoming power-domain code for sh-mobile, before committing.
> 
>  drivers/dma/shdma.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
You should be sending this to LKML as well...

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/shdma.c b/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> index 6eb8454..94d78f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> @@ -235,10 +235,22 @@ static dma_cookie_t sh_dmae_tx_submit(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx)
>  	struct sh_desc *desc = tx_to_sh_desc(tx), *chunk, *last = desc, *c;
>  	struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan = to_sh_chan(tx->chan);
>  	dma_async_tx_callback callback = tx->callback;
> +	struct sh_dmae_slave *param = tx->chan->private;
>  	dma_cookie_t cookie;
>  
> +	pm_runtime_get_sync(sh_chan->dev);
This should be done in issue_pending where the descriptor is supposed to
be submitted. See Documentation/dmaengine.txt
 
> +
>  	spin_lock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
>  
> +	if (param) {
> +		const struct sh_dmae_slave_config *cfg = param->config;
> +
> +		dmae_set_dmars(sh_chan, cfg->mid_rid);
> +		dmae_set_chcr(sh_chan, cfg->chcr);
> +	} else {
> +		dmae_init(sh_chan);
> +	}
> +
>  	cookie = sh_chan->common.cookie;
>  	cookie++;
>  	if (cookie < 0)
> @@ -319,8 +331,6 @@ static int sh_dmae_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
>  	struct sh_dmae_slave *param = chan->private;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	pm_runtime_get_sync(sh_chan->dev);
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * This relies on the guarantee from dmaengine that alloc_chan_resources
>  	 * never runs concurrently with itself or free_chan_resources.
> @@ -340,11 +350,6 @@ static int sh_dmae_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
>  		}
>  
>  		param->config = cfg;
> -
> -		dmae_set_dmars(sh_chan, cfg->mid_rid);
> -		dmae_set_chcr(sh_chan, cfg->chcr);
> -	} else {
> -		dmae_init(sh_chan);
>  	}
>  
>  	spin_lock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> @@ -378,7 +383,6 @@ edescalloc:
>  		clear_bit(param->slave_id, sh_dmae_slave_used);
>  etestused:
>  efindslave:
> -	pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -390,7 +394,6 @@ static void sh_dmae_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
>  	struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan = to_sh_chan(chan);
>  	struct sh_desc *desc, *_desc;
>  	LIST_HEAD(list);
> -	int descs = sh_chan->descs_allocated;
>  
>  	/* Protect against ISR */
>  	spin_lock_irq(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> @@ -417,9 +420,6 @@ static void sh_dmae_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
>  
>  	spin_unlock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
>  
> -	if (descs > 0)
> -		pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> -
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _desc, &list, node)
>  		kfree(desc);
>  }
> @@ -735,6 +735,9 @@ static dma_async_tx_callback __ld_cleanup(struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan, bool all
>  		     async_tx_test_ack(&desc->async_tx)) || all) {
>  			/* Remove from ld_queue list */
>  			desc->mark = DESC_IDLE;
> +
> +			if (tx->cookie > 0)
> +				pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
>  			list_move(&desc->node, &sh_chan->ld_free);
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -894,6 +897,7 @@ static bool sh_dmae_reset(struct sh_dmae_device *shdev)
>  			desc->mark = DESC_IDLE;
>  			if (tx->callback)
>  				tx->callback(tx->callback_param);
> +			pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
>  		}
>  
>  		spin_lock(&sh_chan->desc_lock);


-- 
~Vinod

Re: [PATCH/RFC] dma: shdma: transfer based runtime PM

[Guennadi Liakhovetski]

Hi Vinod

On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Koul, Vinod wrote:

> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:50 +0530, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Currently the shdma dmaengine driver uses runtime PM to save power, when
> > no channel on the specific controller is requested by a user. This patch
> > switches the driver to count individual DMA transfers. That way the
> > controller can be powered down between transfers, even if some of its
> > channels are in use.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
> > ---
> > 
> > I marked this an RFC, because it might make sense to first test it with 
> > Rafael's upcoming power-domain code for sh-mobile, before committing.
> > 
> >  drivers/dma/shdma.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> You should be sending this to LKML as well...

added

> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/shdma.c b/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> > index 6eb8454..94d78f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> > @@ -235,10 +235,22 @@ static dma_cookie_t sh_dmae_tx_submit(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx)
> >  	struct sh_desc *desc = tx_to_sh_desc(tx), *chunk, *last = desc, *c;
> >  	struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan = to_sh_chan(tx->chan);
> >  	dma_async_tx_callback callback = tx->callback;
> > +	struct sh_dmae_slave *param = tx->chan->private;
> >  	dma_cookie_t cookie;
> >  
> > +	pm_runtime_get_sync(sh_chan->dev);
> This should be done in issue_pending where the descriptor is supposed to
> be submitted. See Documentation/dmaengine.txt

So, you're saying, that drivers' .device_issue_pending() method is allowed 
to sleep? But in dma_issue_pending_all() it is called under a 
rcu_read_(un)lock(), so, sleeping there doesn't seem like a good idea to 
me?

Thanks
Guennadi

> > +
> >  	spin_lock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> >  
> > +	if (param) {
> > +		const struct sh_dmae_slave_config *cfg = param->config;
> > +
> > +		dmae_set_dmars(sh_chan, cfg->mid_rid);
> > +		dmae_set_chcr(sh_chan, cfg->chcr);
> > +	} else {
> > +		dmae_init(sh_chan);
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	cookie = sh_chan->common.cookie;
> >  	cookie++;
> >  	if (cookie < 0)
> > @@ -319,8 +331,6 @@ static int sh_dmae_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
> >  	struct sh_dmae_slave *param = chan->private;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > -	pm_runtime_get_sync(sh_chan->dev);
> > -
> >  	/*
> >  	 * This relies on the guarantee from dmaengine that alloc_chan_resources
> >  	 * never runs concurrently with itself or free_chan_resources.
> > @@ -340,11 +350,6 @@ static int sh_dmae_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		param->config = cfg;
> > -
> > -		dmae_set_dmars(sh_chan, cfg->mid_rid);
> > -		dmae_set_chcr(sh_chan, cfg->chcr);
> > -	} else {
> > -		dmae_init(sh_chan);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	spin_lock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> > @@ -378,7 +383,6 @@ edescalloc:
> >  		clear_bit(param->slave_id, sh_dmae_slave_used);
> >  etestused:
> >  efindslave:
> > -	pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -390,7 +394,6 @@ static void sh_dmae_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
> >  	struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan = to_sh_chan(chan);
> >  	struct sh_desc *desc, *_desc;
> >  	LIST_HEAD(list);
> > -	int descs = sh_chan->descs_allocated;
> >  
> >  	/* Protect against ISR */
> >  	spin_lock_irq(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> > @@ -417,9 +420,6 @@ static void sh_dmae_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
> >  
> >  	spin_unlock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> >  
> > -	if (descs > 0)
> > -		pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> > -
> >  	list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _desc, &list, node)
> >  		kfree(desc);
> >  }
> > @@ -735,6 +735,9 @@ static dma_async_tx_callback __ld_cleanup(struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan, bool all
> >  		     async_tx_test_ack(&desc->async_tx)) || all) {
> >  			/* Remove from ld_queue list */
> >  			desc->mark = DESC_IDLE;
> > +
> > +			if (tx->cookie > 0)
> > +				pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> >  			list_move(&desc->node, &sh_chan->ld_free);
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > @@ -894,6 +897,7 @@ static bool sh_dmae_reset(struct sh_dmae_device *shdev)
> >  			desc->mark = DESC_IDLE;
> >  			if (tx->callback)
> >  				tx->callback(tx->callback_param);
> > +			pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		spin_lock(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> 
> 
> -- 
> ~Vinod
> 

---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/

Re: [PATCH/RFC] dma: shdma: transfer based runtime PM

[Guennadi Liakhovetski]

Hi Vinod

On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Koul, Vinod wrote:

> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:50 +0530, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Currently the shdma dmaengine driver uses runtime PM to save power, when
> > no channel on the specific controller is requested by a user. This patch
> > switches the driver to count individual DMA transfers. That way the
> > controller can be powered down between transfers, even if some of its
> > channels are in use.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
> > ---
> > 
> > I marked this an RFC, because it might make sense to first test it with 
> > Rafael's upcoming power-domain code for sh-mobile, before committing.
> > 
> >  drivers/dma/shdma.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> You should be sending this to LKML as well...

added

> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/shdma.c b/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> > index 6eb8454..94d78f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> > @@ -235,10 +235,22 @@ static dma_cookie_t sh_dmae_tx_submit(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx)
> >  	struct sh_desc *desc = tx_to_sh_desc(tx), *chunk, *last = desc, *c;
> >  	struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan = to_sh_chan(tx->chan);
> >  	dma_async_tx_callback callback = tx->callback;
> > +	struct sh_dmae_slave *param = tx->chan->private;
> >  	dma_cookie_t cookie;
> >  
> > +	pm_runtime_get_sync(sh_chan->dev);
> This should be done in issue_pending where the descriptor is supposed to
> be submitted. See Documentation/dmaengine.txt

So, you're saying, that drivers' .device_issue_pending() method is allowed 
to sleep? But in dma_issue_pending_all() it is called under a 
rcu_read_(un)lock(), so, sleeping there doesn't seem like a good idea to 
me?

Thanks
Guennadi

> > +
> >  	spin_lock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> >  
> > +	if (param) {
> > +		const struct sh_dmae_slave_config *cfg = param->config;
> > +
> > +		dmae_set_dmars(sh_chan, cfg->mid_rid);
> > +		dmae_set_chcr(sh_chan, cfg->chcr);
> > +	} else {
> > +		dmae_init(sh_chan);
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	cookie = sh_chan->common.cookie;
> >  	cookie++;
> >  	if (cookie < 0)
> > @@ -319,8 +331,6 @@ static int sh_dmae_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
> >  	struct sh_dmae_slave *param = chan->private;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > -	pm_runtime_get_sync(sh_chan->dev);
> > -
> >  	/*
> >  	 * This relies on the guarantee from dmaengine that alloc_chan_resources
> >  	 * never runs concurrently with itself or free_chan_resources.
> > @@ -340,11 +350,6 @@ static int sh_dmae_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		param->config = cfg;
> > -
> > -		dmae_set_dmars(sh_chan, cfg->mid_rid);
> > -		dmae_set_chcr(sh_chan, cfg->chcr);
> > -	} else {
> > -		dmae_init(sh_chan);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	spin_lock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> > @@ -378,7 +383,6 @@ edescalloc:
> >  		clear_bit(param->slave_id, sh_dmae_slave_used);
> >  etestused:
> >  efindslave:
> > -	pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -390,7 +394,6 @@ static void sh_dmae_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
> >  	struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan = to_sh_chan(chan);
> >  	struct sh_desc *desc, *_desc;
> >  	LIST_HEAD(list);
> > -	int descs = sh_chan->descs_allocated;
> >  
> >  	/* Protect against ISR */
> >  	spin_lock_irq(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> > @@ -417,9 +420,6 @@ static void sh_dmae_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
> >  
> >  	spin_unlock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> >  
> > -	if (descs > 0)
> > -		pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> > -
> >  	list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _desc, &list, node)
> >  		kfree(desc);
> >  }
> > @@ -735,6 +735,9 @@ static dma_async_tx_callback __ld_cleanup(struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan, bool all
> >  		     async_tx_test_ack(&desc->async_tx)) || all) {
> >  			/* Remove from ld_queue list */
> >  			desc->mark = DESC_IDLE;
> > +
> > +			if (tx->cookie > 0)
> > +				pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> >  			list_move(&desc->node, &sh_chan->ld_free);
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > @@ -894,6 +897,7 @@ static bool sh_dmae_reset(struct sh_dmae_device *shdev)
> >  			desc->mark = DESC_IDLE;
> >  			if (tx->callback)
> >  				tx->callback(tx->callback_param);
> > +			pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		spin_lock(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> 
> 
> -- 
> ~Vinod
> 

---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/

RE: [PATCH/RFC] dma: shdma: transfer based runtime PM

[Koul, Vinod]

> > On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:50 +0530, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Currently the shdma dmaengine driver uses runtime PM to save power, when
> > > no channel on the specific controller is requested by a user. This patch
> > > switches the driver to count individual DMA transfers. That way the
> > > controller can be powered down between transfers, even if some of its
> > > channels are in use.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I marked this an RFC, because it might make sense to first test it with
> > > Rafael's upcoming power-domain code for sh-mobile, before committing.
> > >
> > >  drivers/dma/shdma.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++------------
> > >  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > You should be sending this to LKML as well...
> 
> added
> 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/shdma.c b/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> > > index 6eb8454..94d78f2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> > > @@ -235,10 +235,22 @@ static dma_cookie_t sh_dmae_tx_submit(struct
> dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx)
> > >  	struct sh_desc *desc = tx_to_sh_desc(tx), *chunk, *last = desc, *c;
> > >  	struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan = to_sh_chan(tx->chan);
> > >  	dma_async_tx_callback callback = tx->callback;
> > > +	struct sh_dmae_slave *param = tx->chan->private;
> > >  	dma_cookie_t cookie;
> > >
> > > +	pm_runtime_get_sync(sh_chan->dev);
> > This should be done in issue_pending where the descriptor is supposed to
> > be submitted. See Documentation/dmaengine.txt
> 
> So, you're saying, that drivers' .device_issue_pending() method is allowed
> to sleep? But in dma_issue_pending_all() it is called under a
> rcu_read_(un)lock(), so, sleeping there doesn't seem like a good idea to
> me?
Yes agreed, if you are issuing from the non sleeping context, it makes sense 
to have it here. I was only concerned that typically h/w should be woken up 
when we want it to start, which is issue_pending.
 
> 
> Thanks
> Guennadi
> 
> > > +
> > >  	spin_lock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> > >
> > > +	if (param) {
> > > +		const struct sh_dmae_slave_config *cfg = param->config;
> > > +
> > > +		dmae_set_dmars(sh_chan, cfg->mid_rid);
> > > +		dmae_set_chcr(sh_chan, cfg->chcr);
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		dmae_init(sh_chan);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > >  	cookie = sh_chan->common.cookie;
> > >  	cookie++;
> > >  	if (cookie < 0)
> > > @@ -319,8 +331,6 @@ static int sh_dmae_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan
> *chan)
> > >  	struct sh_dmae_slave *param = chan->private;
> > >  	int ret;
> > >
> > > -	pm_runtime_get_sync(sh_chan->dev);
> > > -
> > >  	/*
> > >  	 * This relies on the guarantee from dmaengine that alloc_chan_resources
> > >  	 * never runs concurrently with itself or free_chan_resources.
> > > @@ -340,11 +350,6 @@ static int sh_dmae_alloc_chan_resources(struct
> dma_chan *chan)
> > >  		}
> > >
> > >  		param->config = cfg;
> > > -
> > > -		dmae_set_dmars(sh_chan, cfg->mid_rid);
> > > -		dmae_set_chcr(sh_chan, cfg->chcr);
> > > -	} else {
> > > -		dmae_init(sh_chan);
> > >  	}
> > >
> > >  	spin_lock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> > > @@ -378,7 +383,6 @@ edescalloc:
> > >  		clear_bit(param->slave_id, sh_dmae_slave_used);
> > >  etestused:
> > >  efindslave:
> > > -	pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> > >  	return ret;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > @@ -390,7 +394,6 @@ static void sh_dmae_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan
> *chan)
> > >  	struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan = to_sh_chan(chan);
> > >  	struct sh_desc *desc, *_desc;
> > >  	LIST_HEAD(list);
> > > -	int descs = sh_chan->descs_allocated;
> > >
> > >  	/* Protect against ISR */
> > >  	spin_lock_irq(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> > > @@ -417,9 +420,6 @@ static void sh_dmae_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan
> *chan)
> > >
> > >  	spin_unlock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> > >
> > > -	if (descs > 0)
> > > -		pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> > > -
> > >  	list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _desc, &list, node)
> > >  		kfree(desc);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -735,6 +735,9 @@ static dma_async_tx_callback __ld_cleanup(struct
> sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan, bool all
> > >  		     async_tx_test_ack(&desc->async_tx)) || all) {
> > >  			/* Remove from ld_queue list */
> > >  			desc->mark = DESC_IDLE;
> > > +
> > > +			if (tx->cookie > 0)
> > > +				pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> > >  			list_move(&desc->node, &sh_chan->ld_free);
> > >  		}
> > >  	}
> > > @@ -894,6 +897,7 @@ static bool sh_dmae_reset(struct sh_dmae_device *shdev)
> > >  			desc->mark = DESC_IDLE;
> > >  			if (tx->callback)
> > >  				tx->callback(tx->callback_param);
> > > +			pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> > >  		}
> > >
> > >  		spin_lock(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> >
> >
> > --
> > ~Vinod
> >
> 
> ---
> Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
> Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
> http://www.open-technology.de/

RE: [PATCH/RFC] dma: shdma: transfer based runtime PM

[Koul, Vinod]

> > On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:50 +0530, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Currently the shdma dmaengine driver uses runtime PM to save power, when
> > > no channel on the specific controller is requested by a user. This patch
> > > switches the driver to count individual DMA transfers. That way the
> > > controller can be powered down between transfers, even if some of its
> > > channels are in use.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I marked this an RFC, because it might make sense to first test it with
> > > Rafael's upcoming power-domain code for sh-mobile, before committing.
> > >
> > >  drivers/dma/shdma.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++------------
> > >  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > You should be sending this to LKML as well...
> 
> added
> 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/shdma.c b/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> > > index 6eb8454..94d78f2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/shdma.c
> > > @@ -235,10 +235,22 @@ static dma_cookie_t sh_dmae_tx_submit(struct
> dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx)
> > >  	struct sh_desc *desc = tx_to_sh_desc(tx), *chunk, *last = desc, *c;
> > >  	struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan = to_sh_chan(tx->chan);
> > >  	dma_async_tx_callback callback = tx->callback;
> > > +	struct sh_dmae_slave *param = tx->chan->private;
> > >  	dma_cookie_t cookie;
> > >
> > > +	pm_runtime_get_sync(sh_chan->dev);
> > This should be done in issue_pending where the descriptor is supposed to
> > be submitted. See Documentation/dmaengine.txt
> 
> So, you're saying, that drivers' .device_issue_pending() method is allowed
> to sleep? But in dma_issue_pending_all() it is called under a
> rcu_read_(un)lock(), so, sleeping there doesn't seem like a good idea to
> me?
Yes agreed, if you are issuing from the non sleeping context, it makes sense 
to have it here. I was only concerned that typically h/w should be woken up 
when we want it to start, which is issue_pending.
 
> 
> Thanks
> Guennadi
> 
> > > +
> > >  	spin_lock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> > >
> > > +	if (param) {
> > > +		const struct sh_dmae_slave_config *cfg = param->config;
> > > +
> > > +		dmae_set_dmars(sh_chan, cfg->mid_rid);
> > > +		dmae_set_chcr(sh_chan, cfg->chcr);
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		dmae_init(sh_chan);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > >  	cookie = sh_chan->common.cookie;
> > >  	cookie++;
> > >  	if (cookie < 0)
> > > @@ -319,8 +331,6 @@ static int sh_dmae_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan
> *chan)
> > >  	struct sh_dmae_slave *param = chan->private;
> > >  	int ret;
> > >
> > > -	pm_runtime_get_sync(sh_chan->dev);
> > > -
> > >  	/*
> > >  	 * This relies on the guarantee from dmaengine that alloc_chan_resources
> > >  	 * never runs concurrently with itself or free_chan_resources.
> > > @@ -340,11 +350,6 @@ static int sh_dmae_alloc_chan_resources(struct
> dma_chan *chan)
> > >  		}
> > >
> > >  		param->config = cfg;
> > > -
> > > -		dmae_set_dmars(sh_chan, cfg->mid_rid);
> > > -		dmae_set_chcr(sh_chan, cfg->chcr);
> > > -	} else {
> > > -		dmae_init(sh_chan);
> > >  	}
> > >
> > >  	spin_lock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> > > @@ -378,7 +383,6 @@ edescalloc:
> > >  		clear_bit(param->slave_id, sh_dmae_slave_used);
> > >  etestused:
> > >  efindslave:
> > > -	pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> > >  	return ret;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > @@ -390,7 +394,6 @@ static void sh_dmae_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan
> *chan)
> > >  	struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan = to_sh_chan(chan);
> > >  	struct sh_desc *desc, *_desc;
> > >  	LIST_HEAD(list);
> > > -	int descs = sh_chan->descs_allocated;
> > >
> > >  	/* Protect against ISR */
> > >  	spin_lock_irq(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> > > @@ -417,9 +420,6 @@ static void sh_dmae_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan
> *chan)
> > >
> > >  	spin_unlock_bh(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> > >
> > > -	if (descs > 0)
> > > -		pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> > > -
> > >  	list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _desc, &list, node)
> > >  		kfree(desc);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -735,6 +735,9 @@ static dma_async_tx_callback __ld_cleanup(struct
> sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan, bool all
> > >  		     async_tx_test_ack(&desc->async_tx)) || all) {
> > >  			/* Remove from ld_queue list */
> > >  			desc->mark = DESC_IDLE;
> > > +
> > > +			if (tx->cookie > 0)
> > > +				pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> > >  			list_move(&desc->node, &sh_chan->ld_free);
> > >  		}
> > >  	}
> > > @@ -894,6 +897,7 @@ static bool sh_dmae_reset(struct sh_dmae_device *shdev)
> > >  			desc->mark = DESC_IDLE;
> > >  			if (tx->callback)
> > >  				tx->callback(tx->callback_param);
> > > +			pm_runtime_put(sh_chan->dev);
> > >  		}
> > >
> > >  		spin_lock(&sh_chan->desc_lock);
> >
> >
> > --
> > ~Vinod
> >
> 
> ---
> Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
> Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
> http://www.open-technology.de/

Re: [PATCH/RFC] dma: shdma: transfer based runtime PM

[Paul Mundt]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 09:20:34AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Currently the shdma dmaengine driver uses runtime PM to save power, when
> no channel on the specific controller is requested by a user. This patch
> switches the driver to count individual DMA transfers. That way the
> controller can be powered down between transfers, even if some of its
> channels are in use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
> ---
> 
> I marked this an RFC, because it might make sense to first test it with 
> Rafael's upcoming power-domain code for sh-mobile, before committing.
> 
Any updates on this?

Re: [PATCH/RFC] dma: shdma: transfer based runtime PM

[Guennadi Liakhovetski]

On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Paul Mundt wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 09:20:34AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Currently the shdma dmaengine driver uses runtime PM to save power, when
> > no channel on the specific controller is requested by a user. This patch
> > switches the driver to count individual DMA transfers. That way the
> > controller can be powered down between transfers, even if some of its
> > channels are in use.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
> > ---
> > 
> > I marked this an RFC, because it might make sense to first test it with 
> > Rafael's upcoming power-domain code for sh-mobile, before committing.
> > 
> Any updates on this?

No, not yet. Still waiting for Rafael's code to appear in "next."

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/