Re: [BUG?]3.0-rc4+ftrace+kprobe: set kprobe at instruction 'stwu' lead to system crash/freeze

[Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>]

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:47:13PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2011/06/24 19:29), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 17:21 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> When I use kprobe to do something, I found some wired thing.
> >>
> >> When CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER is disabled:
> >> (gdb) disassemble do_fork
> >> Dump of assembler code for function do_fork:
> >>    0xc0037390 <+0>:	mflr    r0
> >>    0xc0037394 <+4>:	stwu    r1,-64(r1)
> >>    0xc0037398 <+8>:	mfcr    r12
> >>    0xc003739c <+12>:	stmw    r27,44(r1)
> >>
> >> Then I:
> >> modprobe kprobe_example func=do_fork offset=4
> >> ls
> >> Things works well.
> >>
> >> But when CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER is enabled:
> >> (gdb) disassemble do_fork
> >> Dump of assembler code for function do_fork:
> >>    0xc0040334 <+0>:	mflr    r0
> >>    0xc0040338 <+4>:	stw     r0,4(r1)
> >>    0xc004033c <+8>:	bl      0xc00109d4 <mcount>
> >>    0xc0040340 <+12>:	stwu    r1,-80(r1)
> >>    0xc0040344 <+16>:	mflr    r0
> >>    0xc0040348 <+20>:	stw     r0,84(r1)
> >>    0xc004034c <+24>:	mfcr    r12
> >> Then I:
> >> modprobe kprobe_example func=do_fork offset=12
> >> ls
> >> 'ls' will never retrun. system freeze.
> > 
> > I'm not sure if x86 had a similar issue.
> > 
> > Masami, have any ideas to why this happened?
> 
> No, I don't familiar with ppc implementation. I guess
> that single-step resume code failed to emulate the
> instruction, but it strongly depends on ppc arch.
> Maybe IBM people may know what happened.
> 
> Ananth, Jim, would you have any ideas?

On powerpc, we emulate sstep whenever possible. Only recently support to
emulate loads and stores got added. I don't have access to a powerpc box
today... but will try to recreate the problem ASAP and see what could be
happening in the presence of mcount.

Ananth