From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 27 (uml)
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:01:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110627100119.9bebaa5b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110627164259.GF11013@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:42:59 +0100 Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 06:30:43PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am Montag 27 Juni 2011, 17:27:33 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> > > On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:16:56 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > > Changes since 20110624:
> > > uml defconfig builds on x86 (32-bit and 64-bit) fail with:
> > >
> > > fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c:756: error: 'mask' undeclared (first use in this
> > > function)
> >
> > Hmm, "->permission() sanitizing: don't pass flags to ->permission()" is the evil doer.
> > Al?
>
> Gyah... s/mask/desired/ in that line. Will fold...
Ack, that works, thanks.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] linux-next: Tree for June 27 (uml)
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:01:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110627100119.9bebaa5b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110627164259.GF11013@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:42:59 +0100 Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 06:30:43PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am Montag 27 Juni 2011, 17:27:33 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> > > On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:16:56 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > > Changes since 20110624:
> > > uml defconfig builds on x86 (32-bit and 64-bit) fail with:
> > >
> > > fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c:756: error: 'mask' undeclared (first use in this
> > > function)
> >
> > Hmm, "->permission() sanitizing: don't pass flags to ->permission()" is the evil doer.
> > Al?
>
> Gyah... s/mask/desired/ in that line. Will fold...
Ack, that works, thanks.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-27 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-27 6:16 linux-next: Tree for June 27 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-27 15:27 ` linux-next: Tree for June 27 (uml) Randy Dunlap
2011-06-27 16:30 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-06-27 16:30 ` [uml-devel] " Richard Weinberger
2011-06-27 16:42 ` Al Viro
2011-06-27 17:01 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2011-06-27 17:01 ` [uml-devel] " Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110627100119.9bebaa5b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.