From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 0/3] Add drivers/pwm and drivers/pwm/st_pwm.c
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:13:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201106281713.16099.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110628100438.GI6069@pengutronix.de>
On Tuesday 28 June 2011, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >
> > Good question. If Sascha is able to come up with the patch to introduce
> > the generic layer, I think it would be good to have it go though him.
>
> Just posted a rebased and documented series again. Let's see what
> happens. The time seems good to finally get this into the kernel.
I'd say let's go forward with your framework. The two patches currently
because they both add Makefile/Kconfig files in drivers/pwm.
Maybe you can add Viresh's patch to your series, and wait for him
to follow up with a patch to convert it?
I've tried to blindly do the conversion myself, but got stuck with the
definition of the platform device that has multiple pwms in it.
I wonder if it would be better to change the st-pwm platform
interface to define one platform_device for each of them.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Armando VISCONTI <armando.visconti@st.com>,
Shiraz HASHIM <shiraz.hashim@st.com>,
Vipin KUMAR <vipin.kumar@st.com>,
Rajeev KUMAR <rajeev-dlh.kumar@st.com>,
Deepak SIKRI <deepak.sikri@st.com>,
Vipul Kumar SAMAR <vipulkumar.samar@st.com>,
Amit VIRDI <Amit.VIRDI@st.com>,
Pratyush ANAND <pratyush.anand@st.com>,
Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@st.com>,
"viresh.linux@gmail.com" <viresh.linux@gmail.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] Add drivers/pwm and drivers/pwm/st_pwm.c
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:13:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201106281713.16099.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110628100438.GI6069@pengutronix.de>
On Tuesday 28 June 2011, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >
> > Good question. If Sascha is able to come up with the patch to introduce
> > the generic layer, I think it would be good to have it go though him.
>
> Just posted a rebased and documented series again. Let's see what
> happens. The time seems good to finally get this into the kernel.
I'd say let's go forward with your framework. The two patches currently
because they both add Makefile/Kconfig files in drivers/pwm.
Maybe you can add Viresh's patch to your series, and wait for him
to follow up with a patch to convert it?
I've tried to blindly do the conversion myself, but got stuck with the
definition of the platform device that has multiple pwms in it.
I wonder if it would be better to change the st-pwm platform
interface to define one platform_device for each of them.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-28 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-31 8:51 [PATCH V2 0/3] Add drivers/pwm and drivers/pwm/st_pwm.c Viresh Kumar
2011-05-31 8:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2011-05-31 8:51 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] drivers/pwm st_pwm: Add support for ST's Pulse Width Modulator Viresh Kumar
2011-06-07 10:17 ` [PATCH V3 " Viresh Kumar
2011-06-07 0:33 ` [PATCH V2 " Andrew Morton
2011-06-07 0:33 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-07 3:55 ` viresh kumar
2011-06-07 3:55 ` viresh kumar
2011-06-07 7:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-07 7:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-07 10:10 ` viresh kumar
2011-06-07 10:10 ` viresh kumar
2011-05-31 8:51 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] SPEAr3xx: Add machine support for ST's PWM IP Viresh Kumar
2011-05-31 8:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2011-05-31 8:51 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] SPEAr3xx: Update defconfig for ST's PWM Viresh Kumar
2011-05-31 8:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2011-06-27 11:12 ` [PATCH V2 0/3] Add drivers/pwm and drivers/pwm/st_pwm.c viresh kumar
2011-06-27 11:12 ` viresh kumar
2011-06-27 13:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-27 13:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-28 10:04 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-28 10:04 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-28 15:13 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-06-28 15:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-29 9:14 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-29 9:14 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-06-29 9:35 ` viresh kumar
2011-06-29 9:35 ` viresh kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201106281713.16099.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.