All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [md PATCH 01/36] md: beginnings of bad block management.
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:58:47 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110721025847.8422.29443.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110721024556.8422.99443.stgit@notabene.brown>

This the first step in allowing md to track bad-blocks per-device so
that we can fail individual blocks rather than the whole device.

This patch just adds a data structure for recording bad blocks, with
routines to add, remove, search the list.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---

 drivers/md/md.c |  457 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/md/md.h |   49 ++++++
 2 files changed, 502 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 2a32050..220fadb 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -1952,6 +1952,10 @@ static void unbind_rdev_from_array(mdk_rdev_t * rdev)
 	sysfs_remove_link(&rdev->kobj, "block");
 	sysfs_put(rdev->sysfs_state);
 	rdev->sysfs_state = NULL;
+	kfree(rdev->badblocks.page);
+	rdev->badblocks.count = 0;
+	rdev->badblocks.page = NULL;
+	rdev->badblocks.active_page = NULL;
 	/* We need to delay this, otherwise we can deadlock when
 	 * writing to 'remove' to "dev/state".  We also need
 	 * to delay it due to rcu usage.
@@ -2778,7 +2782,7 @@ static struct kobj_type rdev_ktype = {
 	.default_attrs	= rdev_default_attrs,
 };
 
-void md_rdev_init(mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
+int md_rdev_init(mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
 {
 	rdev->desc_nr = -1;
 	rdev->saved_raid_disk = -1;
@@ -2794,6 +2798,20 @@ void md_rdev_init(mdk_rdev_t *rdev)
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rdev->same_set);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&rdev->blocked_wait);
+
+	/* Add space to store bad block list.
+	 * This reserves the space even on arrays where it cannot
+	 * be used - I wonder if that matters
+	 */
+	rdev->badblocks.count = 0;
+	rdev->badblocks.shift = 0;
+	rdev->badblocks.page = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+	rdev->badblocks.active_page = rdev->badblocks.page;
+	spin_lock_init(&rdev->badblocks.lock);
+	if (rdev->badblocks.page == NULL)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(md_rdev_init);
 /*
@@ -2819,8 +2837,11 @@ static mdk_rdev_t *md_import_device(dev_t newdev, int super_format, int super_mi
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
 
-	md_rdev_init(rdev);
-	if ((err = alloc_disk_sb(rdev)))
+	err = md_rdev_init(rdev);
+	if (err)
+		goto abort_free;
+	err = alloc_disk_sb(rdev);
+	if (err)
 		goto abort_free;
 
 	err = lock_rdev(rdev, newdev, super_format == -2);
@@ -7324,6 +7345,436 @@ void md_wait_for_blocked_rdev(mdk_rdev_t *rdev, mddev_t *mddev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(md_wait_for_blocked_rdev);
 
+
+/* Bad block management.
+ * We can record which blocks on each device are 'bad' and so just
+ * fail those blocks, or that stripe, rather than the whole device.
+ * Entries in the bad-block table are 64bits wide.  This comprises:
+ * Length of bad-range, in sectors: 0-511 for lengths 1-512
+ * Start of bad-range, sector offset, 54 bits (allows 8 exbibytes)
+ *  A 'shift' can be set so that larger blocks are tracked and
+ *  consequently larger devices can be covered.
+ * 'Acknowledged' flag - 1 bit. - the most significant bit.
+ */
+/* Locking of the bad-block table is a two-layer affair.
+ * Read access through ->active_page only requires an rcu_readlock.
+ * However if ->active_page is found to be NULL, the table
+ * should be accessed through ->page which requires an irq-spinlock.
+ * Updating the page requires setting ->active_page to NULL,
+ * synchronising with rcu, then updating ->page under the same
+ * irq-spinlock.
+ * We always set or clear bad blocks from process context, but
+ * might look-up bad blocks from interrupt/bh context.
+ *
+ */
+/* When looking for a bad block we specify a range and want to
+ * know if any block in the range is bad.  So we binary-search
+ * to the last range that starts at-or-before the given endpoint,
+ * (or "before the sector after the target range")
+ * then see if it ends after the given start.
+ * We return
+ *  0 if there are no known bad blocks in the range
+ *  1 if there are known bad block which are all acknowledged
+ * -1 if there are bad blocks which have not yet been acknowledged in metadata.
+ * plus the start/length of the first bad section we overlap.
+ */
+int md_is_badblock(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
+		   sector_t *first_bad, int *bad_sectors)
+{
+	int hi;
+	int lo = 0;
+	u64 *p;
+	int rv = 0;
+	int havelock = 0;
+	sector_t target = s + sectors;
+	unsigned long uninitialized_var(flags);
+
+	if (bb->shift > 0) {
+		/* round the start down, and the end up */
+		s >>= bb->shift;
+		target += (1<<bb->shift) - 1;
+		target >>= bb->shift;
+		sectors = target - s;
+	}
+	/* 'target' is now the first block after the bad range */
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	p = rcu_dereference(bb->active_page);
+	if (!p) {
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&bb->lock, flags);
+		p = bb->page;
+		havelock = 1;
+	}
+	hi = bb->count;
+
+	/* Binary search between lo and hi for 'target'
+	 * i.e. for the last range that starts before 'target'
+	 */
+	/* INVARIANT: ranges before 'lo' and at-or-after 'hi'
+	 * are known not to be the last range before target.
+	 * VARIANT: hi-lo is the number of possible
+	 * ranges, and decreases until it reaches 1
+	 */
+	while (hi - lo > 1) {
+		int mid = (lo + hi) / 2;
+		sector_t a = BB_OFFSET(p[mid]);
+		if (a < target)
+			/* This could still be the one, earlier ranges
+			 * could not. */
+			lo = mid;
+		else
+			/* This and later ranges are definitely out. */
+			hi = mid;
+	}
+	/* 'lo' might be the last that started before target, but 'hi' isn't */
+	if (hi > lo) {
+		/* need to check all range that end after 's' to see if
+		 * any are unacknowledged.
+		 */
+		while (lo >= 0 &&
+		       BB_OFFSET(p[lo]) + BB_LEN(p[lo]) > s) {
+			if (BB_OFFSET(p[lo]) < target) {
+				/* starts before the end, and finishes after
+				 * the start, so they must overlap
+				 */
+				if (rv != -1 && BB_ACK(p[lo]))
+					rv = 1;
+				else
+					rv = -1;
+				*first_bad = BB_OFFSET(p[lo]);
+				*bad_sectors = BB_LEN(p[lo]);
+			}
+			lo--;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (havelock)
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bb->lock, flags);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return rv;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(md_is_badblock);
+
+/*
+ * Add a range of bad blocks to the table.
+ * This might extend the table, or might contract it
+ * if two adjacent ranges can be merged.
+ * We binary-search to find the 'insertion' point, then
+ * decide how best to handle it.
+ */
+static int md_set_badblocks(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
+			    int acknowledged)
+{
+	u64 *p;
+	int lo, hi;
+	int rv = 1;
+
+	if (bb->shift < 0)
+		/* badblocks are disabled */
+		return 0;
+
+	if (bb->shift) {
+		/* round the start down, and the end up */
+		sector_t next = s + sectors;
+		s >>= bb->shift;
+		next += (1<<bb->shift) - 1;
+		next >>= bb->shift;
+		sectors = next - s;
+	}
+
+	while (1) {
+		rcu_assign_pointer(bb->active_page, NULL);
+		synchronize_rcu();
+		spin_lock_irq(&bb->lock);
+		if (bb->active_page == NULL)
+			break;
+		/* someone else just unlocked, better retry */
+		spin_unlock_irq(&bb->lock);
+	}
+	/* now have exclusive access to the page */
+
+	p = bb->page;
+	lo = 0;
+	hi = bb->count;
+	/* Find the last range that starts at-or-before 's' */
+	while (hi - lo > 1) {
+		int mid = (lo + hi) / 2;
+		sector_t a = BB_OFFSET(p[mid]);
+		if (a <= s)
+			lo = mid;
+		else
+			hi = mid;
+	}
+	if (hi > lo && BB_OFFSET(p[lo]) > s)
+		hi = lo;
+
+	if (hi > lo) {
+		/* we found a range that might merge with the start
+		 * of our new range
+		 */
+		sector_t a = BB_OFFSET(p[lo]);
+		sector_t e = a + BB_LEN(p[lo]);
+		int ack = BB_ACK(p[lo]);
+		if (e >= s) {
+			/* Yes, we can merge with a previous range */
+			if (s == a && s + sectors >= e)
+				/* new range covers old */
+				ack = acknowledged;
+			else
+				ack = ack && acknowledged;
+
+			if (e < s + sectors)
+				e = s + sectors;
+			if (e - a <= BB_MAX_LEN) {
+				p[lo] = BB_MAKE(a, e-a, ack);
+				s = e;
+			} else {
+				/* does not all fit in one range,
+				 * make p[lo] maximal
+				 */
+				if (BB_LEN(p[lo]) != BB_MAX_LEN)
+					p[lo] = BB_MAKE(a, BB_MAX_LEN, ack);
+				s = a + BB_MAX_LEN;
+			}
+			sectors = e - s;
+		}
+	}
+	if (sectors && hi < bb->count) {
+		/* 'hi' points to the first range that starts after 's'.
+		 * Maybe we can merge with the start of that range */
+		sector_t a = BB_OFFSET(p[hi]);
+		sector_t e = a + BB_LEN(p[hi]);
+		int ack = BB_ACK(p[hi]);
+		if (a <= s + sectors) {
+			/* merging is possible */
+			if (e <= s + sectors) {
+				/* full overlap */
+				e = s + sectors;
+				ack = acknowledged;
+			} else
+				ack = ack && acknowledged;
+
+			a = s;
+			if (e - a <= BB_MAX_LEN) {
+				p[hi] = BB_MAKE(a, e-a, ack);
+				s = e;
+			} else {
+				p[hi] = BB_MAKE(a, BB_MAX_LEN, ack);
+				s = a + BB_MAX_LEN;
+			}
+			sectors = e - s;
+			lo = hi;
+			hi++;
+		}
+	}
+	if (sectors == 0 && hi < bb->count) {
+		/* we might be able to combine lo and hi */
+		/* Note: 's' is at the end of 'lo' */
+		sector_t a = BB_OFFSET(p[hi]);
+		int lolen = BB_LEN(p[lo]);
+		int hilen = BB_LEN(p[hi]);
+		int newlen = lolen + hilen - (s - a);
+		if (s >= a && newlen < BB_MAX_LEN) {
+			/* yes, we can combine them */
+			int ack = BB_ACK(p[lo]) && BB_ACK(p[hi]);
+			p[lo] = BB_MAKE(BB_OFFSET(p[lo]), newlen, ack);
+			memmove(p + hi, p + hi + 1,
+				(bb->count - hi - 1) * 8);
+			bb->count--;
+		}
+	}
+	while (sectors) {
+		/* didn't merge (it all).
+		 * Need to add a range just before 'hi' */
+		if (bb->count >= MD_MAX_BADBLOCKS) {
+			/* No room for more */
+			rv = 0;
+			break;
+		} else {
+			int this_sectors = sectors;
+			memmove(p + hi + 1, p + hi,
+				(bb->count - hi) * 8);
+			bb->count++;
+
+			if (this_sectors > BB_MAX_LEN)
+				this_sectors = BB_MAX_LEN;
+			p[hi] = BB_MAKE(s, this_sectors, acknowledged);
+			sectors -= this_sectors;
+			s += this_sectors;
+		}
+	}
+
+	bb->changed = 1;
+	rcu_assign_pointer(bb->active_page, bb->page);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&bb->lock);
+
+	return rv;
+}
+
+int rdev_set_badblocks(mdk_rdev_t *rdev, sector_t s, int sectors,
+		       int acknowledged)
+{
+	int rv = md_set_badblocks(&rdev->badblocks,
+				  s + rdev->data_offset, sectors, acknowledged);
+	if (rv) {
+		/* Make sure they get written out promptly */
+		set_bit(MD_CHANGE_CLEAN, &rdev->mddev->flags);
+		md_wakeup_thread(rdev->mddev->thread);
+	}
+	return rv;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rdev_set_badblocks);
+
+/*
+ * Remove a range of bad blocks from the table.
+ * This may involve extending the table if we spilt a region,
+ * but it must not fail.  So if the table becomes full, we just
+ * drop the remove request.
+ */
+static int md_clear_badblocks(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors)
+{
+	u64 *p;
+	int lo, hi;
+	sector_t target = s + sectors;
+	int rv = 0;
+
+	if (bb->shift > 0) {
+		/* When clearing we round the start up and the end down.
+		 * This should not matter as the shift should align with
+		 * the block size and no rounding should ever be needed.
+		 * However it is better the think a block is bad when it
+		 * isn't than to think a block is not bad when it is.
+		 */
+		s += (1<<bb->shift) - 1;
+		s >>= bb->shift;
+		target >>= bb->shift;
+		sectors = target - s;
+	}
+
+	while (1) {
+		rcu_assign_pointer(bb->active_page, NULL);
+		synchronize_rcu();
+		spin_lock_irq(&bb->lock);
+		if (bb->active_page == NULL)
+			break;
+		/* someone else just unlocked, better retry */
+		spin_unlock_irq(&bb->lock);
+	}
+	/* now have exclusive access to the page */
+
+	p = bb->page;
+	lo = 0;
+	hi = bb->count;
+	/* Find the last range that starts before 'target' */
+	while (hi - lo > 1) {
+		int mid = (lo + hi) / 2;
+		sector_t a = BB_OFFSET(p[mid]);
+		if (a < target)
+			lo = mid;
+		else
+			hi = mid;
+	}
+	if (hi > lo) {
+		/* p[lo] is the last range that could overlap the
+		 * current range.  Earlier ranges could also overlap,
+		 * but only this one can overlap the end of the range.
+		 */
+		if (BB_OFFSET(p[lo]) + BB_LEN(p[lo]) > target) {
+			/* Partial overlap, leave the tail of this range */
+			int ack = BB_ACK(p[lo]);
+			sector_t a = BB_OFFSET(p[lo]);
+			sector_t end = a + BB_LEN(p[lo]);
+
+			if (a < s) {
+				/* we need to split this range */
+				if (bb->count >= MD_MAX_BADBLOCKS) {
+					rv = 0;
+					goto out;
+				}
+				memmove(p+lo+1, p+lo, (bb->count - lo) * 8);
+				bb->count++;
+				p[lo] = BB_MAKE(a, s-a, ack);
+				lo++;
+			}
+			p[lo] = BB_MAKE(target, end - target, ack);
+			/* there is no longer an overlap */
+			hi = lo;
+			lo--;
+		}
+		while (lo >= 0 &&
+		       BB_OFFSET(p[lo]) + BB_LEN(p[lo]) > s) {
+			/* This range does overlap */
+			if (BB_OFFSET(p[lo]) < s) {
+				/* Keep the early parts of this range. */
+				int ack = BB_ACK(p[lo]);
+				sector_t start = BB_OFFSET(p[lo]);
+				p[lo] = BB_MAKE(start, s - start, ack);
+				/* now low doesn't overlap, so.. */
+				break;
+			}
+			lo--;
+		}
+		/* 'lo' is strictly before, 'hi' is strictly after,
+		 * anything between needs to be discarded
+		 */
+		if (hi - lo > 1) {
+			memmove(p+lo+1, p+hi, (bb->count - hi) * 8);
+			bb->count -= (hi - lo - 1);
+		}
+	}
+
+	bb->changed = 1;
+out:
+	rcu_assign_pointer(bb->active_page, bb->page);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&bb->lock);
+	return rv;
+}
+
+int rdev_clear_badblocks(mdk_rdev_t *rdev, sector_t s, int sectors)
+{
+	return md_clear_badblocks(&rdev->badblocks,
+				  s + rdev->data_offset,
+				  sectors);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rdev_clear_badblocks);
+
+/*
+ * Acknowledge all bad blocks in a list.
+ * This only succeeds if ->changed is clear.  It is used by
+ * in-kernel metadata updates
+ */
+void md_ack_all_badblocks(struct badblocks *bb)
+{
+	if (bb->page == NULL || bb->changed)
+		/* no point even trying */
+		return;
+	while (1) {
+		rcu_assign_pointer(bb->active_page, NULL);
+		synchronize_rcu();
+		spin_lock_irq(&bb->lock);
+		if (bb->active_page == NULL)
+			break;
+		/* someone else just unlocked, better retry */
+		spin_unlock_irq(&bb->lock);
+	}
+	/* now have exclusive access to the page */
+
+	if (bb->changed == 0) {
+		u64 *p = bb->page;
+		int i;
+		for (i = 0; i < bb->count ; i++) {
+			if (!BB_ACK(p[i])) {
+				sector_t start = BB_OFFSET(p[i]);
+				int len = BB_LEN(p[i]);
+				p[i] = BB_MAKE(start, len, 1);
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	rcu_assign_pointer(bb->active_page, bb->page);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&bb->lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(md_ack_all_badblocks);
+
 static int md_notify_reboot(struct notifier_block *this,
 			    unsigned long code, void *x)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.h b/drivers/md/md.h
index 7d906a9..d327734 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.h
+++ b/drivers/md/md.h
@@ -29,6 +29,13 @@
 typedef struct mddev_s mddev_t;
 typedef struct mdk_rdev_s mdk_rdev_t;
 
+/* Bad block numbers are stored sorted in a single page.
+ * 64bits is used for each block or extent.
+ * 54 bits are sector number, 9 bits are extent size,
+ * 1 bit is an 'acknowledged' flag.
+ */
+#define MD_MAX_BADBLOCKS	(PAGE_SIZE/8)
+
 /*
  * MD's 'extended' device
  */
@@ -111,8 +118,48 @@ struct mdk_rdev_s
 
 	struct sysfs_dirent *sysfs_state; /* handle for 'state'
 					   * sysfs entry */
+
+	struct badblocks {
+		int	count;		/* count of bad blocks */
+		int	shift;		/* shift from sectors to block size
+					 * a -ve shift means badblocks are
+					 * disabled.*/
+		u64	*page;		/* badblock list */
+		u64	*active_page;	/* either 'page' or 'NULL' */
+		int	changed;
+		spinlock_t lock;
+	} badblocks;
 };
 
+#define BB_LEN_MASK	(0x00000000000001FFULL)
+#define BB_OFFSET_MASK	(0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFE00ULL)
+#define BB_ACK_MASK	(0x8000000000000000ULL)
+#define BB_MAX_LEN	512
+#define BB_OFFSET(x)	(((x) & BB_OFFSET_MASK) >> 9)
+#define BB_LEN(x)	(((x) & BB_LEN_MASK) + 1)
+#define BB_ACK(x)	(!!((x) & BB_ACK_MASK))
+#define BB_MAKE(a, l, ack) (((a)<<9) | ((l)-1) | ((u64)(!!(ack)) << 63))
+
+extern int md_is_badblock(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
+			  sector_t *first_bad, int *bad_sectors);
+static inline int is_badblock(mdk_rdev_t *rdev, sector_t s, int sectors,
+			      sector_t *first_bad, int *bad_sectors)
+{
+	if (unlikely(rdev->badblocks.count)) {
+		int rv = md_is_badblock(&rdev->badblocks, rdev->data_offset + s,
+					sectors,
+					first_bad, bad_sectors);
+		if (rv)
+			*first_bad -= rdev->data_offset;
+		return rv;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+extern int rdev_set_badblocks(mdk_rdev_t *rdev, sector_t s, int sectors,
+			      int acknowledged);
+extern int rdev_clear_badblocks(mdk_rdev_t *rdev, sector_t s, int sectors);
+extern void md_ack_all_badblocks(struct badblocks *bb);
+
 struct mddev_s
 {
 	void				*private;
@@ -517,7 +564,7 @@ extern void mddev_init(mddev_t *mddev);
 extern int md_run(mddev_t *mddev);
 extern void md_stop(mddev_t *mddev);
 extern void md_stop_writes(mddev_t *mddev);
-extern void md_rdev_init(mdk_rdev_t *rdev);
+extern int md_rdev_init(mdk_rdev_t *rdev);
 
 extern void mddev_suspend(mddev_t *mddev);
 extern void mddev_resume(mddev_t *mddev);



  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-21  2:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-21  2:58 [md PATCH 00/36] md patches for 3.1 - part 2: bad block logs NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-07-22 15:03   ` [md PATCH 01/36] md: beginnings of bad block management Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  2:26     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26  5:17       ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22 16:52   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  3:20     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 04/36] md: load/store badblock list from v1.x metadata NeilBrown
2011-07-22 16:34   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 03/36] md: don't allow arrays to contain devices with bad blocks NeilBrown
2011-07-22 15:47   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 02/36] md/bad-block-log: add sysfs interface for accessing bad-block-log NeilBrown
2011-07-22 15:43   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  2:29     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26  5:17       ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26  8:48   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 15:03     ` [PATCH v2] md: add documentation for bad block log Namhyung Kim
2011-07-27  1:05     ` [md PATCH 02/36] md/bad-block-log: add sysfs interface for accessing bad-block-log NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 13/36] md/raid1: Handle write errors by updating badblock log NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:28   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 08/36] md: add 'write_error' flag to component devices NeilBrown
2011-07-26 15:22   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 06/36] md/raid1: avoid reading from known bad blocks NeilBrown
2011-07-26 14:06   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 05/36] md: Disable bad blocks and v0.90 metadata NeilBrown
2011-07-22 17:02   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 10/36] md/raid1: avoid writing to known-bad blocks on known-bad drives NeilBrown
2011-07-27  4:09   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-27  4:19     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 07/36] md/raid1: avoid reading known bad blocks during resync NeilBrown
2011-07-26 14:25   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 09/36] md: make it easier to wait for bad blocks to be acknowledged NeilBrown
2011-07-26 16:04   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-27  1:18     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 11/36] md/raid1: clear bad-block record when write succeeds NeilBrown
2011-07-27  5:05   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 12/36] md/raid1: store behind-write pages in bi_vecs NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:16   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 14/36] md/raid1: record badblocks found during resync etc NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:39   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 15/36] md/raid1: improve handling of read failure during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:45   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 24/36] md/raid10: avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 1 NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 22/36] md/raid10: simplify/reindent some loops NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 20/36] md/raid5. Don't write to known bad block on doubtful devices NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 23/36] md/raid10: Split handle_read_error out from raid10d NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 16/36] md/raid1: factor several functions out or raid1d() NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:55   ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-28  1:39     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 17/36] md/raid5: avoid reading from known bad blocks NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 18/36] md/raid5: use bad-block log to improve handling of uncorrectable read errors NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 19/36] md/raid5: write errors should be recorded as bad blocks if possible NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 21/36] md/raid5: Clear bad blocks on successful write NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 33/36] md/raid10: record bad blocks due to write errors during resync/recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 32/36] md/raid10: attempt to fix read errors during resync/check NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 28/36] md/raid10 record bad blocks as needed during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 27/36] md/raid10: avoid reading known bad blocks during resync/recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 26/36] md/raid10 - avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 3 NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 34/36] md/raid10: simplify read error handling during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 29/36] md/raid10: avoid writing to known bad blocks on known bad drives NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 30/36] md/raid10: clear bad-block record when write succeeds NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 31/36] md/raid10: Handle write errors by updating badblock log NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 25/36] md/raid10: avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 2 NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 35/36] md/raid10: Handle read errors during recovery better NeilBrown
2011-07-21  2:58 ` [md PATCH 36/36] md/raid10: handle further errors during fix_read_error better NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110721025847.8422.29443.stgit@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.