From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [md PATCH 30/36] md/raid10: clear bad-block record when write succeeds.
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:58:50 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110721025850.8422.77943.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110721024556.8422.99443.stgit@notabene.brown>
If we succeed in writing to a block that was recorded as
being bad, we clear the bad-block record.
This requires some delayed handling as the bad-block-list update has
to happen in process-context.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/raid10.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/md/raid10.h | 11 ++++++
2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index 7dcd318..c809d3d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static void put_all_bios(conf_t *conf, r10bio_t *r10_bio)
for (i = 0; i < conf->copies; i++) {
struct bio **bio = & r10_bio->devs[i].bio;
- if (*bio && *bio != IO_BLOCKED)
+ if (!BIO_SPECIAL(*bio))
bio_put(*bio);
*bio = NULL;
}
@@ -267,7 +267,8 @@ static inline void update_head_pos(int slot, r10bio_t *r10_bio)
/*
* Find the disk number which triggered given bio
*/
-static int find_bio_disk(conf_t *conf, r10bio_t *r10_bio, struct bio *bio)
+static int find_bio_disk(conf_t *conf, r10bio_t *r10_bio,
+ struct bio *bio, int *slotp)
{
int slot;
@@ -278,6 +279,8 @@ static int find_bio_disk(conf_t *conf, r10bio_t *r10_bio, struct bio *bio)
BUG_ON(slot == conf->copies);
update_head_pos(slot, r10_bio);
+ if (slotp)
+ *slotp = slot;
return r10_bio->devs[slot].devnum;
}
@@ -329,9 +332,11 @@ static void raid10_end_write_request(struct bio *bio, int error)
int uptodate = test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags);
r10bio_t *r10_bio = bio->bi_private;
int dev;
+ int dec_rdev = 1;
conf_t *conf = r10_bio->mddev->private;
+ int slot;
- dev = find_bio_disk(conf, r10_bio, bio);
+ dev = find_bio_disk(conf, r10_bio, bio, &slot);
/*
* this branch is our 'one mirror IO has finished' event handler:
@@ -340,7 +345,7 @@ static void raid10_end_write_request(struct bio *bio, int error)
md_error(r10_bio->mddev, conf->mirrors[dev].rdev);
/* an I/O failed, we can't clear the bitmap */
set_bit(R10BIO_Degraded, &r10_bio->state);
- } else
+ } else {
/*
* Set R10BIO_Uptodate in our master bio, so that
* we will return a good error code for to the higher
@@ -350,8 +355,23 @@ static void raid10_end_write_request(struct bio *bio, int error)
* user-side. So if something waits for IO, then it will
* wait for the 'master' bio.
*/
+ sector_t first_bad;
+ int bad_sectors;
+
set_bit(R10BIO_Uptodate, &r10_bio->state);
+ /* Maybe we can clear some bad blocks. */
+ if (is_badblock(conf->mirrors[dev].rdev,
+ r10_bio->devs[slot].addr,
+ r10_bio->sectors,
+ &first_bad, &bad_sectors)) {
+ bio_put(bio);
+ r10_bio->devs[slot].bio = IO_MADE_GOOD;
+ dec_rdev = 0;
+ set_bit(R10BIO_MadeGood, &r10_bio->state);
+ }
+ }
+
/*
*
* Let's see if all mirrored write operations have finished
@@ -364,10 +384,13 @@ static void raid10_end_write_request(struct bio *bio, int error)
!test_bit(R10BIO_Degraded, &r10_bio->state),
0);
md_write_end(r10_bio->mddev);
- raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
+ if (test_bit(R10BIO_MadeGood, &r10_bio->state))
+ reschedule_retry(r10_bio);
+ else
+ raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
}
-
- rdev_dec_pending(conf->mirrors[dev].rdev, conf->mddev);
+ if (dec_rdev)
+ rdev_dec_pending(conf->mirrors[dev].rdev, conf->mddev);
}
@@ -1382,7 +1405,7 @@ static void end_sync_read(struct bio *bio, int error)
conf_t *conf = r10_bio->mddev->private;
int d;
- d = find_bio_disk(conf, r10_bio, bio);
+ d = find_bio_disk(conf, r10_bio, bio, NULL);
if (test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags))
set_bit(R10BIO_Uptodate, &r10_bio->state);
@@ -1414,23 +1437,37 @@ static void end_sync_write(struct bio *bio, int error)
mddev_t *mddev = r10_bio->mddev;
conf_t *conf = mddev->private;
int d;
+ sector_t first_bad;
+ int bad_sectors;
+ int slot;
- d = find_bio_disk(conf, r10_bio, bio);
+ d = find_bio_disk(conf, r10_bio, bio, &slot);
if (!uptodate)
md_error(mddev, conf->mirrors[d].rdev);
+ else if (is_badblock(conf->mirrors[d].rdev,
+ r10_bio->devs[slot].addr,
+ r10_bio->sectors,
+ &first_bad, &bad_sectors))
+ set_bit(R10BIO_MadeGood, &r10_bio->state);
rdev_dec_pending(conf->mirrors[d].rdev, mddev);
while (atomic_dec_and_test(&r10_bio->remaining)) {
if (r10_bio->master_bio == NULL) {
/* the primary of several recovery bios */
sector_t s = r10_bio->sectors;
- put_buf(r10_bio);
+ if (test_bit(R10BIO_MadeGood, &r10_bio->state))
+ reschedule_retry(r10_bio);
+ else
+ put_buf(r10_bio);
md_done_sync(mddev, s, 1);
break;
} else {
r10bio_t *r10_bio2 = (r10bio_t *)r10_bio->master_bio;
- put_buf(r10_bio);
+ if (test_bit(R10BIO_MadeGood, &r10_bio->state))
+ reschedule_retry(r10_bio);
+ else
+ put_buf(r10_bio);
r10_bio = r10_bio2;
}
}
@@ -1901,6 +1938,44 @@ read_more:
generic_make_request(bio);
}
+static void handle_write_completed(conf_t *conf, r10bio_t *r10_bio)
+{
+ /* Some sort of write request has finished and it
+ * succeeded in writing where we thought there was a
+ * bad block. So forget the bad block.
+ */
+ int m;
+ mdk_rdev_t *rdev;
+
+ if (test_bit(R10BIO_IsSync, &r10_bio->state) ||
+ test_bit(R10BIO_IsRecover, &r10_bio->state)) {
+ for (m = 0; m < conf->copies; m++)
+ if (r10_bio->devs[m].bio &&
+ test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE,
+ &r10_bio->devs[m].bio->bi_flags)) {
+ int dev = r10_bio->devs[m].devnum;
+ rdev = conf->mirrors[dev].rdev;
+ rdev_clear_badblocks(
+ rdev,
+ r10_bio->devs[m].addr,
+ r10_bio->sectors);
+ }
+ put_buf(r10_bio);
+ } else {
+ for (m = 0; m < conf->copies; m++)
+ if (r10_bio->devs[m].bio == IO_MADE_GOOD) {
+ int dev = r10_bio->devs[m].devnum;
+ rdev = conf->mirrors[dev].rdev;
+ rdev_clear_badblocks(
+ rdev,
+ r10_bio->devs[m].addr,
+ r10_bio->sectors);
+ rdev_dec_pending(rdev, conf->mddev);
+ }
+ raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
+ }
+}
+
static void raid10d(mddev_t *mddev)
{
r10bio_t *r10_bio;
@@ -1928,7 +2003,9 @@ static void raid10d(mddev_t *mddev)
mddev = r10_bio->mddev;
conf = mddev->private;
- if (test_bit(R10BIO_IsSync, &r10_bio->state))
+ if (test_bit(R10BIO_MadeGood, &r10_bio->state))
+ handle_write_completed(conf, r10_bio);
+ else if (test_bit(R10BIO_IsSync, &r10_bio->state))
sync_request_write(mddev, r10_bio);
else if (test_bit(R10BIO_IsRecover, &r10_bio->state))
recovery_request_write(mddev, r10_bio);
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.h b/drivers/md/raid10.h
index c646152..d8b7f9a 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.h
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.h
@@ -118,6 +118,13 @@ struct r10bio_s {
* level, we store IO_BLOCKED in the appropriate 'bios' pointer
*/
#define IO_BLOCKED ((struct bio*)1)
+/* When we successfully write to a known bad-block, we need to remove the
+ * bad-block marking which must be done from process context. So we record
+ * the success by setting devs[n].bio to IO_MADE_GOOD
+ */
+#define IO_MADE_GOOD ((struct bio *)2)
+
+#define BIO_SPECIAL(bio) ((unsigned long)bio <= 2)
/* bits for r10bio.state */
#define R10BIO_Uptodate 0
@@ -128,4 +135,8 @@ struct r10bio_s {
* so that raid10d knows what to do with them.
*/
#define R10BIO_ReadError 4
+/* If a write for this request means we can clear some
+ * known-bad-block records, we set this flag.
+ */
+#define R10BIO_MadeGood 5
#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-21 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-21 2:58 [md PATCH 00/36] md patches for 3.1 - part 2: bad block logs NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 02/36] md/bad-block-log: add sysfs interface for accessing bad-block-log NeilBrown
2011-07-22 15:43 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 2:29 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26 5:17 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 8:48 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 15:03 ` [PATCH v2] md: add documentation for bad block log Namhyung Kim
2011-07-27 1:05 ` [md PATCH 02/36] md/bad-block-log: add sysfs interface for accessing bad-block-log NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 03/36] md: don't allow arrays to contain devices with bad blocks NeilBrown
2011-07-22 15:47 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 04/36] md: load/store badblock list from v1.x metadata NeilBrown
2011-07-22 16:34 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 01/36] md: beginnings of bad block management NeilBrown
2011-07-22 15:03 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 2:26 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-26 5:17 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-22 16:52 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-26 3:20 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 14/36] md/raid1: record badblocks found during resync etc NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:39 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 12/36] md/raid1: store behind-write pages in bi_vecs NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:16 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 11/36] md/raid1: clear bad-block record when write succeeds NeilBrown
2011-07-27 5:05 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 09/36] md: make it easier to wait for bad blocks to be acknowledged NeilBrown
2011-07-26 16:04 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-27 1:18 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 10/36] md/raid1: avoid writing to known-bad blocks on known-bad drives NeilBrown
2011-07-27 4:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-27 4:19 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 07/36] md/raid1: avoid reading known bad blocks during resync NeilBrown
2011-07-26 14:25 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 05/36] md: Disable bad blocks and v0.90 metadata NeilBrown
2011-07-22 17:02 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 13/36] md/raid1: Handle write errors by updating badblock log NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:28 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 06/36] md/raid1: avoid reading from known bad blocks NeilBrown
2011-07-26 14:06 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 08/36] md: add 'write_error' flag to component devices NeilBrown
2011-07-26 15:22 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 17/36] md/raid5: avoid reading from known bad blocks NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 18/36] md/raid5: use bad-block log to improve handling of uncorrectable read errors NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 16/36] md/raid1: factor several functions out or raid1d() NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:55 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-28 1:39 ` NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 19/36] md/raid5: write errors should be recorded as bad blocks if possible NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 21/36] md/raid5: Clear bad blocks on successful write NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 23/36] md/raid10: Split handle_read_error out from raid10d NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 20/36] md/raid5. Don't write to known bad block on doubtful devices NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 24/36] md/raid10: avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 1 NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 22/36] md/raid10: simplify/reindent some loops NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 15/36] md/raid1: improve handling of read failure during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-27 15:45 ` Namhyung Kim
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 25/36] md/raid10: avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 2 NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 31/36] md/raid10: Handle write errors by updating badblock log NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 29/36] md/raid10: avoid writing to known bad blocks on known bad drives NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 34/36] md/raid10: simplify read error handling during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 27/36] md/raid10: avoid reading known bad blocks during resync/recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 28/36] md/raid10 record bad blocks as needed during recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 26/36] md/raid10 - avoid reading from known bad blocks - part 3 NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 32/36] md/raid10: attempt to fix read errors during resync/check NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 33/36] md/raid10: record bad blocks due to write errors during resync/recovery NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 36/36] md/raid10: handle further errors during fix_read_error better NeilBrown
2011-07-21 2:58 ` [md PATCH 35/36] md/raid10: Handle read errors during recovery better NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110721025850.8422.77943.stgit@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.