From: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] base address for shared libs
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 20:22:51 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110723162251.GA11485@openwall.com> (raw)
Vasiliy,
At least on rhel5/openvz kernels, 32-bit processes get their shared libs
loaded at different kinds of addresses on i686 vs. x86_64 kernels.
Here's an example:
32-bit kernel and userland (OpenVZ container):
$ ldd /bin/ls
librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0x00a99000)
libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0x00c1a000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0014d000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00617000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0012e000)
64-bit kernel, 32-bit userland (OpenVZ container):
$ ldd /bin/ls
librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0xb7fcf000)
libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0xb7fca000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7eae000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7e5b000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fe6000)
Notice how the 32-bit kernel produces addresses that are safer against
attacks via C strings (contain NULs). This is the approach I used in
-ow patches (using 0x00110000 as the base address, considering vm86
needs for the first 1 MB + 64 KB). I'd like 64-bit kernels to do the
same when running 32-bit binaries.
Can you please look into this and likely fix it for mainline, as well as
for rhel6/openvz when we're ready to move to those kernels? A fix for
rhel5/openvz would also be welcome if it's easy to do.
Thanks,
Alexander
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-23 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-23 16:22 Solar Designer [this message]
2011-07-24 8:51 ` [kernel-hardening] base address for shared libs Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-24 14:27 ` Solar Designer
2011-07-24 18:18 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-25 19:20 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-11 8:32 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 3:57 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 4:21 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 8:20 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 9:20 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 9:52 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 10:04 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 10:06 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-29 9:27 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-30 18:38 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-30 18:43 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110723162251.GA11485@openwall.com \
--to=solar@openwall.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.