From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] base address for shared libs
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:27:12 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110729092712.GA7727@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110723162251.GA11485@openwall.com>
Solar,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 20:22 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> At least on rhel5/openvz kernels, 32-bit processes get their shared libs
> loaded at different kinds of addresses on i686 vs. x86_64 kernels.
Looking into RHEL6 kernel:
void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
...
if (!(current->personality & READ_IMPLIES_EXEC)
&& mmap_is_ia32())
mm->get_unmapped_exec_area = arch_get_unmapped_exec_area;
...
}
#define SHLIB_BASE 0x00110000
unsigned long
arch_get_unmapped_exec_area(struct file *filp, unsigned long addr0,
unsigned long len0, unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
{
...
if (!addr)
addr = !should_randomize() ? SHLIB_BASE :
randomize_range(SHLIB_BASE, 0x01000000, len);
...
}
Looks like it is considered as a way to easily mmap libraries in CS
limited area by exec-shield, and not as a C-string barrier.
The comment says the common bottom-up doesn't support randomization:
/*
* Bottom-up (legacy) layout on X86_32 did not support randomization, X86_64
* does, but not when emulating X86_32
*/
So, IMO the bottom-up layout allocator should be patched.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-29 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-23 16:22 [kernel-hardening] base address for shared libs Solar Designer
2011-07-24 8:51 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-24 14:27 ` Solar Designer
2011-07-24 18:18 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-25 19:20 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-11 8:32 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 3:57 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 4:21 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 8:20 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 9:20 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 9:52 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 10:04 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 10:06 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-29 9:27 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2011-07-30 18:38 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-30 18:43 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110729092712.GA7727@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.