From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/numa: Remove duplicate RECLAIM_DISTANCE definition
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:33:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110725023426.408998418@samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110725023311.175792493@samba.org
We have two identical definitions of RECLAIM_DISTANCE, looks like
the patch got applied twice. Remove one.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
---
Index: linux-2.6-work/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-work.orig/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h 2011-07-25 12:15:33.059921510 +1000
+++ linux-2.6-work/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h 2011-07-25 12:15:46.750174446 +1000
@@ -19,16 +19,6 @@ struct device_node;
#define RECLAIM_DISTANCE 10
/*
- * Before going off node we want the VM to try and reclaim from the local
- * node. It does this if the remote distance is larger than RECLAIM_DISTANCE.
- * With the default REMOTE_DISTANCE of 20 and the default RECLAIM_DISTANCE of
- * 20, we never reclaim and go off node straight away.
- *
- * To fix this we choose a smaller value of RECLAIM_DISTANCE.
- */
-#define RECLAIM_DISTANCE 10
-
-/*
* Avoid creating an extra level of balancing (SD_ALLNODES) on the largest
* POWER7 boxes which have a maximum of 32 nodes.
*/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/numa: Remove duplicate RECLAIM_DISTANCE definition
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:33:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110725023426.408998418@samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110725023311.175792493@samba.org
[-- Attachment #1: move_duplicate_distance --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1080 bytes --]
We have two identical definitions of RECLAIM_DISTANCE, looks like
the patch got applied twice. Remove one.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
---
Index: linux-2.6-work/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-work.orig/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h 2011-07-25 12:15:33.059921510 +1000
+++ linux-2.6-work/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h 2011-07-25 12:15:46.750174446 +1000
@@ -19,16 +19,6 @@ struct device_node;
#define RECLAIM_DISTANCE 10
/*
- * Before going off node we want the VM to try and reclaim from the local
- * node. It does this if the remote distance is larger than RECLAIM_DISTANCE.
- * With the default REMOTE_DISTANCE of 20 and the default RECLAIM_DISTANCE of
- * 20, we never reclaim and go off node straight away.
- *
- * To fix this we choose a smaller value of RECLAIM_DISTANCE.
- */
-#define RECLAIM_DISTANCE 10
-
-/*
* Avoid creating an extra level of balancing (SD_ALLNODES) on the largest
* POWER7 boxes which have a maximum of 32 nodes.
*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-25 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-25 2:33 [PATCH 0/5] ppc64 scheduler fixes Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 2:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] powerpc/numa: Enable SD_WAKE_AFFINE in node definition Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 2:33 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 2:33 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched: Allow SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN to be overridden Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 2:33 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 2:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/numa: Increase SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN to 32 Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 2:33 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 2:33 ` [PATCH 4/5] powerpc/numa: Disable NEWIDLE balancing at node level Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 2:33 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 2:33 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2011-07-25 2:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/numa: Remove duplicate RECLAIM_DISTANCE definition Anton Blanchard
2011-07-25 12:41 ` [PATCH 0/5] ppc64 scheduler fixes Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-25 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 0:19 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-09-20 0:19 ` Anton Blanchard
2011-09-20 1:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-09-20 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110725023426.408998418@samba.org \
--to=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.