From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Layer priorities influencing default version selection
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 12:26:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108021226.34560.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Hi all,
Andrea pointed out a situation where he has seen the layer priority overriding
version selection, and I've been able to confirm it.
Basically, if you have a recipe with a lower version in a layer with a higher
priority it selects the lower version. What's more after digging further I
found there were some rather anomalous interactions with the version logic and
BBCLASSEXTEND. Here's an example using Poky:
1. Firstly, copy meta/recipes-support/curl to meta-yocto/recipes-support, then
rename the version in meta-yocto so that its version is 7.20.0. At this point
both meta/ and meta-yocto/ have the same layer priority of 5.
2. "bitbake -s | grep ^curl" reports:
curl :7.21.7-r0
curl-native :7.21.7-r0
curl-nativesdk :7.21.7-r0
3. Now increase the layer priority in meta-yocto/conf/layer.conf to 6, and run
"bitbake -s | grep ^curl" again:
curl :7.20.0-r0
curl-native :7.21.7-r0
curl-nativesdk :7.21.7-r0
So the latest version here is a lie, this is not the latest version available.
Furthermore it seems not to have affected the BBCLASSEXTENDs.
4. Now add PREFERRED_VERSION_curl = "7.21.7" to conf/layer.conf and run
"bitbake -s | grep ^curl" again:
curl :7.20.0-r0 :7.21.7-r0
curl-native :7.21.7-r0
curl-nativesdk :7.21.7-r0
So it can clearly see the other recipe, it just doesn't acknowledge it until
you force the matter.
This is all rather undesirable behaviour IMHO - even if the BBCLASSEXTEND and
reported "latest version available" issues were corrected, I think the policy
of "latest version wins unless DEFAULT_PREFERENCE or PREFERRED_VERSION says
otherwise" should not be affected by layer priority.
Thoughts?
Cheers,
Paul
(PS: this is not unique to Poky, Andrea and I first reproduced this with
Angstrom using bitbake master.)
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next reply other threads:[~2011-08-02 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-02 11:26 Paul Eggleton [this message]
2011-08-02 13:45 ` [OE-core] Layer priorities influencing default version selection Richard Purdie
2011-08-02 13:45 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-02 13:52 ` [OE-core] " Phil Blundell
2011-08-02 13:52 ` Phil Blundell
2011-08-02 14:14 ` [OE-core] " Chris Larson
2011-08-02 14:14 ` Chris Larson
2011-08-02 14:21 ` [OE-core] " Paul Eggleton
2011-08-02 14:21 ` [bitbake-devel] " Paul Eggleton
2011-08-02 14:27 ` [OE-core] " Chris Larson
2011-08-02 14:27 ` [bitbake-devel] " Chris Larson
2011-08-02 14:51 ` [OE-core] " Paul Eggleton
2011-08-02 14:51 ` [bitbake-devel] " Paul Eggleton
2011-08-02 14:55 ` [OE-core] " Mark Hatle
2011-08-02 15:35 ` Khem Raj
2011-08-02 15:35 ` [bitbake-devel] " Khem Raj
2011-08-25 10:50 ` [OE-core] " Paul Eggleton
2011-08-25 10:50 ` [bitbake-devel] " Paul Eggleton
2011-08-25 15:56 ` [OE-core] " Khem Raj
2011-08-25 15:56 ` [bitbake-devel] " Khem Raj
2011-08-25 16:58 ` [OE-core] " Paul Eggleton
2011-08-25 16:58 ` [bitbake-devel] " Paul Eggleton
2011-08-25 21:23 ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2011-08-25 21:23 ` [bitbake-devel] " Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201108021226.34560.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.