Re: [OE-core] Layer priorities influencing default version selection

[Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>]

On Tuesday 02 August 2011 15:27:58 Chris Larson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Paul Eggleton
> 
> <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 August 2011 15:14:41 Chris Larson wrote:
> >> as config/class priority is
> >> determined by order of entries in BBLAYERS, whereas recipe priority is
> >> determined by layer.conf.
> > 
> > Is that a good thing though? At the moment I'm not convinced that it is.
> 
> I probably could have worded my reply better. I was pointing out the
> fact that the order is determined in two places right now as being one
> reason why I agreed with his statement that ordering determined by the
> layer isn't ideal.

Well, all the same I'd like to have that question answered, maybe that's a 
different thread.

Back to Phil's original point though, I tend to think issues with meta-oe 
ought to be solved by fixing meta-oe - if some things in meta-oe are causing so 
much trouble that we have to down-grade the priority of the layer in order to 
squelch them, that's bad.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre