From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@googlemail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] shm: fix a race between shm_exit() and shm_init()
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 23:52:58 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110803195258.GA7063@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110803123352.88670c9c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 12:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > + /*
> > > + * For init_ipc_ns shm_ids().rw_mutex is statically initialized
> > > + * as kernel threads should be able to use it in do_exit() before
> > > + * shm_init(), which is called on do_initcall()
> > > + */
> > > + if (ns == &init_ipc_ns)
> > > + ipc_init_ids(&shm_ids(ns));
> > > + else
> > > + ipc_init_ids(&shm_ids(ns));
>
> afacit init_ipc_ns.ids[0].rw_mutex and init_ipc_ns.ids[1].rw_mutex
> never get initialised with this patch?
No, these .rw_mutex are initialized in runtime, as before.
This patch should fix the specific oops (not a dependency issue):
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/3/256
> Still. It seems that the real bug is that driver_init() is trying to
> invoke userspace helpers before the kernel is ready to run userspace.
What if declare a completion, trigger it after all ns init code is
finished, and wait on the completion inside of
call_usermodehelper_exec()?
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-03 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-01 18:01 [kernel-hardening] initcall dependency problem (ns vs. threads) Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-01 18:01 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-01 18:20 ` [kernel-hardening] " Andrew Morton
2011-08-01 18:20 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-01 18:34 ` [kernel-hardening] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-01 19:03 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-01 19:07 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-01 19:22 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-02 0:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-02 12:45 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH] shm: fix a race between shm_exit() and shm_init() Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-02 12:45 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-02 12:51 ` [kernel-hardening] " Manuel Lauss
2011-08-02 12:51 ` Manuel Lauss
2011-08-02 13:23 ` [kernel-hardening] " Richard Weinberger
2011-08-02 13:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-08-02 13:29 ` [kernel-hardening] " Marc Zyngier
2011-08-02 13:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-08-02 20:33 ` [kernel-hardening] " Andrew Morton
2011-08-02 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-02 20:55 ` [kernel-hardening] " Andrew Morton
2011-08-02 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-03 5:30 ` [kernel-hardening] " Manuel Lauss
2011-08-03 5:30 ` Manuel Lauss
2011-08-03 8:05 ` [kernel-hardening] " Marc Zyngier
2011-08-03 8:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-08-03 8:19 ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2011-08-03 8:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-03 10:04 ` [kernel-hardening] " Manuel Lauss
2011-08-03 10:04 ` Manuel Lauss
2011-08-03 10:30 ` [kernel-hardening] " Marc Zyngier
2011-08-03 10:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-08-03 13:13 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2011-08-03 13:33 ` Kay Sievers
2011-08-03 13:45 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-08-04 0:35 ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2011-08-04 0:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-04 0:50 ` [kernel-hardening] " Andrew Morton
2011-08-04 0:50 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-04 1:01 ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2011-08-04 1:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-04 1:15 ` [kernel-hardening] " Kay Sievers
2011-08-04 1:15 ` Kay Sievers
2011-08-04 8:26 ` [kernel-hardening] " Marc Zyngier
2011-08-04 8:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-08-03 7:43 ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2011-08-03 7:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-03 7:50 ` [kernel-hardening] " Manuel Lauss
2011-08-03 7:50 ` Manuel Lauss
2011-08-03 8:00 ` [kernel-hardening] " Manuel Lauss
2011-08-03 8:00 ` Manuel Lauss
2011-08-03 19:33 ` [kernel-hardening] " Andrew Morton
2011-08-03 19:33 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-03 19:52 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110803195258.GA7063@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manuel.lauss@googlemail.com \
--cc=maz@misterjones.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.