From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] ARM: integrate CMA with DMA-mapping subsystem
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:00:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108121700.30967.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313146711-1767-9-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
On Friday 12 August 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> @@ -82,16 +103,16 @@ static struct page *__dma_alloc_buffer(struct device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gf
> if (mask < 0xffffffffULL)
> gfp |= GFP_DMA;
>
> - page = alloc_pages(gfp, order);
> - if (!page)
> - return NULL;
> -
> /*
> - * Now split the huge page and free the excess pages
> + * Allocate contiguous memory
> */
> - split_page(page, order);
> - for (p = page + (size >> PAGE_SHIFT), e = page + (1 << order); p < e; p++)
> - __free_page(p);
> + if (cma_available())
> + page = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(dev, count, order);
> + else
> + page = __dma_alloc_system_pages(count, gfp, order);
> +
> + if (!page)
> + return NULL;
Why do you need the fallback here? I would assume that CMA now has to be available
on ARMv6 and up to work at all. When you allocate from __dma_alloc_system_pages(),
wouldn't that necessarily fail in the dma_remap_area() stage?
>
> - if (arch_is_coherent() || nommu()) {
> + if (arch_is_coherent() || nommu() ||
> + (cma_available() && !(gfp & GFP_ATOMIC))) {
> + /*
> + * Allocate from system or CMA pages
> + */
> struct page *page = __dma_alloc_buffer(dev, size, gfp);
> if (!page)
> return NULL;
> + dma_remap_area(page, size, area->prot);
> pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> ret = page_address(page);
Similarly with coherent and nommu. It seems to me that lumping too
many cases together creates extra complexity here.
How about something like
if (arch_is_coherent() || nommu())
ret = alloc_simple_buffer();
else if (arch_is_v4_v5())
ret = alloc_remap();
else if (gfp & GFP_ATOMIC)
ret = alloc_from_pool();
else
ret = alloc_from_contiguous();
This also allows a natural conversion to dma_map_ops when we get there.
> /* reserve any platform specific memblock areas */
> if (mdesc->reserve)
> mdesc->reserve();
>
> + dma_coherent_reserve();
> + dma_contiguous_reserve();
> +
> memblock_analyze();
> memblock_dump_all();
> }
Since we can handle most allocations using CMA on ARMv6+, I would think
that we can have a much smaller reserved area. Have you tried changing
dma_coherent_reserve() to allocate out of the contiguous area instead of
wasting a full 2MB section of memory?
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Chunsang Jeong <chunsang.jeong@linaro.org>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
Jesse Barker <jesse.barker@linaro.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com>,
Shariq Hasnain <shariq.hasnain@linaro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] ARM: integrate CMA with DMA-mapping subsystem
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:00:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108121700.30967.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313146711-1767-9-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
On Friday 12 August 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> @@ -82,16 +103,16 @@ static struct page *__dma_alloc_buffer(struct device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gf
> if (mask < 0xffffffffULL)
> gfp |= GFP_DMA;
>
> - page = alloc_pages(gfp, order);
> - if (!page)
> - return NULL;
> -
> /*
> - * Now split the huge page and free the excess pages
> + * Allocate contiguous memory
> */
> - split_page(page, order);
> - for (p = page + (size >> PAGE_SHIFT), e = page + (1 << order); p < e; p++)
> - __free_page(p);
> + if (cma_available())
> + page = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(dev, count, order);
> + else
> + page = __dma_alloc_system_pages(count, gfp, order);
> +
> + if (!page)
> + return NULL;
Why do you need the fallback here? I would assume that CMA now has to be available
on ARMv6 and up to work at all. When you allocate from __dma_alloc_system_pages(),
wouldn't that necessarily fail in the dma_remap_area() stage?
>
> - if (arch_is_coherent() || nommu()) {
> + if (arch_is_coherent() || nommu() ||
> + (cma_available() && !(gfp & GFP_ATOMIC))) {
> + /*
> + * Allocate from system or CMA pages
> + */
> struct page *page = __dma_alloc_buffer(dev, size, gfp);
> if (!page)
> return NULL;
> + dma_remap_area(page, size, area->prot);
> pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> ret = page_address(page);
Similarly with coherent and nommu. It seems to me that lumping too
many cases together creates extra complexity here.
How about something like
if (arch_is_coherent() || nommu())
ret = alloc_simple_buffer();
else if (arch_is_v4_v5())
ret = alloc_remap();
else if (gfp & GFP_ATOMIC)
ret = alloc_from_pool();
else
ret = alloc_from_contiguous();
This also allows a natural conversion to dma_map_ops when we get there.
> /* reserve any platform specific memblock areas */
> if (mdesc->reserve)
> mdesc->reserve();
>
> + dma_coherent_reserve();
> + dma_contiguous_reserve();
> +
> memblock_analyze();
> memblock_dump_all();
> }
Since we can handle most allocations using CMA on ARMv6+, I would think
that we can have a much smaller reserved area. Have you tried changing
dma_coherent_reserve() to allocate out of the contiguous area instead of
wasting a full 2MB section of memory?
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Chunsang Jeong <chunsang.jeong@linaro.org>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
Jesse Barker <jesse.barker@linaro.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com>,
Shariq Hasnain <shariq.hasnain@linaro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] ARM: integrate CMA with DMA-mapping subsystem
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:00:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108121700.30967.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313146711-1767-9-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
On Friday 12 August 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> @@ -82,16 +103,16 @@ static struct page *__dma_alloc_buffer(struct device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gf
> if (mask < 0xffffffffULL)
> gfp |= GFP_DMA;
>
> - page = alloc_pages(gfp, order);
> - if (!page)
> - return NULL;
> -
> /*
> - * Now split the huge page and free the excess pages
> + * Allocate contiguous memory
> */
> - split_page(page, order);
> - for (p = page + (size >> PAGE_SHIFT), e = page + (1 << order); p < e; p++)
> - __free_page(p);
> + if (cma_available())
> + page = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(dev, count, order);
> + else
> + page = __dma_alloc_system_pages(count, gfp, order);
> +
> + if (!page)
> + return NULL;
Why do you need the fallback here? I would assume that CMA now has to be available
on ARMv6 and up to work at all. When you allocate from __dma_alloc_system_pages(),
wouldn't that necessarily fail in the dma_remap_area() stage?
>
> - if (arch_is_coherent() || nommu()) {
> + if (arch_is_coherent() || nommu() ||
> + (cma_available() && !(gfp & GFP_ATOMIC))) {
> + /*
> + * Allocate from system or CMA pages
> + */
> struct page *page = __dma_alloc_buffer(dev, size, gfp);
> if (!page)
> return NULL;
> + dma_remap_area(page, size, area->prot);
> pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> ret = page_address(page);
Similarly with coherent and nommu. It seems to me that lumping too
many cases together creates extra complexity here.
How about something like
if (arch_is_coherent() || nommu())
ret = alloc_simple_buffer();
else if (arch_is_v4_v5())
ret = alloc_remap();
else if (gfp & GFP_ATOMIC)
ret = alloc_from_pool();
else
ret = alloc_from_contiguous();
This also allows a natural conversion to dma_map_ops when we get there.
> /* reserve any platform specific memblock areas */
> if (mdesc->reserve)
> mdesc->reserve();
>
> + dma_coherent_reserve();
> + dma_contiguous_reserve();
> +
> memblock_analyze();
> memblock_dump_all();
> }
Since we can handle most allocations using CMA on ARMv6+, I would think
that we can have a much smaller reserved area. Have you tried changing
dma_coherent_reserve() to allocate out of the contiguous area instead of
wasting a full 2MB section of memory?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-12 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-12 10:58 [PATCHv14 0/9] Contiguous Memory Allocator Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm: move some functions from memory_hotplug.c to page_isolation.c Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm: alloc_contig_freed_pages() added Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm: alloc_contig_range() added Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm: MIGRATE_CMA migration type added Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm: MIGRATE_CMA isolation functions added Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 6/9] drivers: add Contiguous Memory Allocator Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM: DMA: steal memory for DMA coherent mappings Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 12:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-12 12:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-12 12:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-14 7:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-14 7:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-14 7:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-16 13:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-16 13:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-16 13:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-16 13:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-16 13:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-16 13:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-16 14:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-16 14:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-16 14:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-17 8:01 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-17 8:01 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-17 8:01 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-17 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-17 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-17 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-17 13:06 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-17 13:06 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-17 13:06 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-18 8:27 ` Tixy
2011-08-18 8:27 ` Tixy
2011-08-18 8:27 ` Tixy
2011-08-17 12:49 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-17 12:49 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-17 12:49 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-16 10:17 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-16 10:17 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-16 10:17 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: integrate CMA with DMA-mapping subsystem Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 15:00 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2011-08-12 15:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-12 15:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-16 9:29 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-16 9:29 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-16 9:29 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-16 13:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-16 13:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-16 13:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: S5PV210: example of CMA private area for FIMC device on Goni board Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-08-12 10:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-06 13:54 [PATCHv16 0/9] Contiguous Memory Allocator Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-06 13:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: integrate CMA with DMA-mapping subsystem Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-06 13:54 ` Marek Szyprowski
2011-10-06 13:54 ` Marek Szyprowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201108121700.30967.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.