All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mitsuo Hayasaka <mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avoid null pointer access in vm_struct
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:39:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110817123959.800164ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110817132848.2352.80544.stgit@ltc219.sdl.hitachi.co.jp>

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:28:48 +0900
Mitsuo Hayasaka <mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com> wrote:

> The /proc/vmallocinfo shows information about vmalloc allocations in vmlist
> that is a linklist of vm_struct. It, however, may access pages field of
> vm_struct where a page was not allocated, which results in a null pointer
> access and leads to a kernel panic.
> 
> Why this happen:
> For example, in __vmalloc_area_node, the nr_pages field of vm_struct are
> set to the expected number of pages to be allocated, before the actual
> pages allocations. At the same time, when the /proc/vmallocinfo is read, it
> accesses the pages field of vm_struct according to the nr_pages field at
> show_numa_info(). Thus, a null pointer access happens.
> 
> Patch:
> This patch avoids accessing the pages field with unallocated page when
> show_numa_info() is called. So, it can solve this problem.

Do we have a similar race when running __vunmap() in parallel with
show_numa_info()?

> index 7ef0903..e2ec5b0 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2472,13 +2472,16 @@ static void show_numa_info(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_struct *v)
>  	if (NUMA_BUILD) {
>  		unsigned int nr, *counters = m->private;
>  
> -		if (!counters)
> +		if (!counters || !v->nr_pages || !v->pages)
>  			return;
>  
>  		memset(counters, 0, nr_node_ids * sizeof(unsigned int));
>  
> -		for (nr = 0; nr < v->nr_pages; nr++)
> +		for (nr = 0; nr < v->nr_pages; nr++) {
> +			if (!v->pages[nr])
> +				break;
>  			counters[page_to_nid(v->pages[nr])]++;
> +		}
>  
>  		for_each_node_state(nr, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
>  			if (counters[nr])

I think this has memory ordering issues: it requires that this CPU see
the modification to ->nr_pages and ->pages in the same order as the CPU
which is writing ->nr_pages, ->pages and ->pages[x].  Perhaps fixable
by taking vmlist_lock appropriately.

I suspect that the real bug is that __vmalloc_area_node() and its
caller made the new vmap_area globally visible before it was fully
initialised.  If we were to fix that, the /proc/vmallocinfo read would
not encounter this vm_struct at all.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mitsuo Hayasaka <mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avoid null pointer access in vm_struct
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:39:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110817123959.800164ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110817132848.2352.80544.stgit@ltc219.sdl.hitachi.co.jp>

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:28:48 +0900
Mitsuo Hayasaka <mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com> wrote:

> The /proc/vmallocinfo shows information about vmalloc allocations in vmlist
> that is a linklist of vm_struct. It, however, may access pages field of
> vm_struct where a page was not allocated, which results in a null pointer
> access and leads to a kernel panic.
> 
> Why this happen:
> For example, in __vmalloc_area_node, the nr_pages field of vm_struct are
> set to the expected number of pages to be allocated, before the actual
> pages allocations. At the same time, when the /proc/vmallocinfo is read, it
> accesses the pages field of vm_struct according to the nr_pages field at
> show_numa_info(). Thus, a null pointer access happens.
> 
> Patch:
> This patch avoids accessing the pages field with unallocated page when
> show_numa_info() is called. So, it can solve this problem.

Do we have a similar race when running __vunmap() in parallel with
show_numa_info()?

> index 7ef0903..e2ec5b0 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2472,13 +2472,16 @@ static void show_numa_info(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_struct *v)
>  	if (NUMA_BUILD) {
>  		unsigned int nr, *counters = m->private;
>  
> -		if (!counters)
> +		if (!counters || !v->nr_pages || !v->pages)
>  			return;
>  
>  		memset(counters, 0, nr_node_ids * sizeof(unsigned int));
>  
> -		for (nr = 0; nr < v->nr_pages; nr++)
> +		for (nr = 0; nr < v->nr_pages; nr++) {
> +			if (!v->pages[nr])
> +				break;
>  			counters[page_to_nid(v->pages[nr])]++;
> +		}
>  
>  		for_each_node_state(nr, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
>  			if (counters[nr])

I think this has memory ordering issues: it requires that this CPU see
the modification to ->nr_pages and ->pages in the same order as the CPU
which is writing ->nr_pages, ->pages and ->pages[x].  Perhaps fixable
by taking vmlist_lock appropriately.

I suspect that the real bug is that __vmalloc_area_node() and its
caller made the new vmap_area globally visible before it was fully
initialised.  If we were to fix that, the /proc/vmallocinfo read would
not encounter this vm_struct at all.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-17 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-17 13:28 [PATCH] avoid null pointer access in vm_struct Mitsuo Hayasaka
2011-08-17 13:28 ` Mitsuo Hayasaka
2011-08-17 19:39 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-08-17 19:39   ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-18  9:21   ` HAYASAKA Mitsuo
2011-08-18  9:21     ` HAYASAKA Mitsuo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110817123959.800164ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@hitachi.com \
    --cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.