From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: use per-filesystem I/O completion workqueues
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:48:11 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110825004811.GK3162@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110824060150.001321834@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:59:26AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The new concurrency managed workqueues are cheap enough that we can
> create them per-filesystem instead of global. This allows us to only
> flush items for the current filesystem during sync, and to remove the
> trylock or defer scheme on the ilock, which is not compatible with
> using the workqueue flush for integrity purposes in the sync code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
The only issue I see with this is that it brings back per-filesystem
workqueue threads. Because all the workqueues are defined with
MEM_RECLAIM, there is a rescuer thread per workqueue that is used
when the CWMQ cannot allocate memory to queue the work to the
appropriate per-cpu queue.
Right now we have:
$ ps -ef |grep [x]fs
root 748 2 0 Aug23 ? 00:00:00 [xfs_mru_cache]
root 749 2 0 Aug23 ? 00:00:00 [xfslogd]
root 750 2 0 Aug23 ? 00:00:00 [xfsdatad]
root 751 2 0 Aug23 ? 00:00:00 [xfsconvertd]
$
where the xfslogd, xfsdatad and xfsconvertd are the rescuer threads.
I don't think this is a big problem, but it is definitely something
worth noting (at least in the commit message) given that we've
removed just about all the per-filesystem threads recently...
Cheers,
Dave.
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c 2011-08-23 04:35:20.822345321 +0200
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c 2011-08-23 04:37:02.425128226 +0200
> @@ -131,30 +131,22 @@ static inline bool xfs_ioend_is_append(s
> * will be the intended file size until i_size is updated. If this write does
> * not extend all the way to the valid file size then restrict this update to
> * the end of the write.
> - *
> - * This function does not block as blocking on the inode lock in IO completion
> - * can lead to IO completion order dependency deadlocks.. If it can't get the
> - * inode ilock it will return EAGAIN. Callers must handle this.
> */
> -STATIC int
> +STATIC void
> xfs_setfilesize(
> xfs_ioend_t *ioend)
> {
> xfs_inode_t *ip = XFS_I(ioend->io_inode);
> xfs_fsize_t isize;
>
> - if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL))
> - return EAGAIN;
> -
> + xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> isize = xfs_ioend_new_eof(ioend);
> if (isize) {
> trace_xfs_setfilesize(ip, ioend->io_offset, ioend->io_size);
> ip->i_d.di_size = isize;
> xfs_mark_inode_dirty(ip);
> }
> -
> xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> - return 0;
> }
If we are going to block here, then we probably should increase the
per-cpu concurrency of the work queue so that we can continue to
process other ioends while this one is blocked.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-25 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-24 5:59 [PATCH 0/3] RFC: log all i_size updates Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-24 5:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: improve ioend error handling Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-02 0:19 ` Dave Chinner
2011-09-12 14:40 ` Alex Elder
2011-09-12 14:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-24 5:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: use per-filesystem I/O completion workqueues Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-25 0:48 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-08-25 5:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110825004811.GK3162@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.