From: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@hansjkoch.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@hansjkoch.de>,
Jan Altenberg <jan@linutronix.de>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, b.spranger@linutronix.de,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bade page state while calling munmap() for kmalloc'ed UIO memory
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:55:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110901185502.GB8408@local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110831161307.d605848b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:13:07PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 11:58:25 +0200
> "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@hansjkoch.de> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:05:47PM +0200, Jan Altenberg wrote:
> >
> > [Since we got no reply on linux-mm, I added lkml and Andrew to Cc: (mm doesn't
> > seem to have a maintainer...)]
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm currently analysing a problem similar to some mmap() issue reported
> > > in the past: https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/11/140
> >
> > The arch there was microblaze, and you are working on arm. That means
> > the problem appears on at least to archs.
> >
> > >
> > > So, what I'm trying to do is mapping some physically continuous memory
> > > (allocated by kmalloc) to userspace, using a trivial UIO driver (the
> > > idea is that a device can directly DMA to that buffer):
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > #define MEM_SIZE (4 * PAGE_SIZE)
> > >
> > > addr = kmalloc(MEM_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL)
> > > [...]
> > > info.mem[0].addr = (unsigned long) addr;
> > > info.mem[0].internal_addr = addr;
> > > info.mem[0].size = MEM_SIZE;
> > > info.mem[0].memtype = UIO_MEM_LOGICAL;
> > > [...]
> > > ret = uio_register_device(&pdev->dev, &info);
> > >
> > > Userspace maps that memory range and writes its contents to a file:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > fd = open("/dev/uio0", O_RDWR);
> > > if (fd < 0) {
> > > perror("Can't open UIO device\n");
> > > exit(1);
> > > }
> > >
> > > mem_map = mmap(NULL, MAP_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> > > MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0);
> > >
> > > if(mem_map == MAP_FAILED) {
> > > perror("Can't map UIO memory\n");
> > > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > goto out_file;
> > > }
> > > [...]
> > > bytes_written = write(fd_file, mem_map, MAP_SIZE)
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > munmap(mem_map);
> >
> > >From my point of view (I've got Jan's full test case code), this
> > is a completely correct UIO use case.
> >
> > >
> > > So, what happens is (I'm currently testing with 3.0.3 on ARM
> > > VersatilePB): When I do the munmap(), I run into the following error:
> > >
> > > BUG: Bad page state in process uio_test pfn:078ed
> > > page:c0409154 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0
> > > page flags: 0x284(referenced|slab|arch_1)
>
> PG_slab is set. The kernel is complaining because a page which was
> allocated via kmalloc/kmem_cache_alloc was directly passed to the page
> allocator for freeing. It should have been passed to kfree().
>
> Presumably the uio driver expects that its memory was allocated via
> alloc_pages(), not via kmalloc().
Thanks for that hint. I'll check and will update UIO documentation
accordingly if necessary.
BUT the following problems are still threatening my mental health:
If userspace gets a valid and working pointer from mmap(), it is
entitled to expect munmap() to work on that pointer, too, isn't it?
Shouldn't mmap() fail in such a case?
The kernel's behavior should be the same, no matter which SLAB or
SLUB is chosen.
Or am I following wrong philosophies?
Thanks,
Hans
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@hansjkoch.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@hansjkoch.de>,
Jan Altenberg <jan@linutronix.de>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, b.spranger@linutronix.de,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bade page state while calling munmap() for kmalloc'ed UIO memory
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:55:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110901185502.GB8408@local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110831161307.d605848b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:13:07PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 11:58:25 +0200
> "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@hansjkoch.de> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:05:47PM +0200, Jan Altenberg wrote:
> >
> > [Since we got no reply on linux-mm, I added lkml and Andrew to Cc: (mm doesn't
> > seem to have a maintainer...)]
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm currently analysing a problem similar to some mmap() issue reported
> > > in the past: https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/11/140
> >
> > The arch there was microblaze, and you are working on arm. That means
> > the problem appears on at least to archs.
> >
> > >
> > > So, what I'm trying to do is mapping some physically continuous memory
> > > (allocated by kmalloc) to userspace, using a trivial UIO driver (the
> > > idea is that a device can directly DMA to that buffer):
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > #define MEM_SIZE (4 * PAGE_SIZE)
> > >
> > > addr = kmalloc(MEM_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL)
> > > [...]
> > > info.mem[0].addr = (unsigned long) addr;
> > > info.mem[0].internal_addr = addr;
> > > info.mem[0].size = MEM_SIZE;
> > > info.mem[0].memtype = UIO_MEM_LOGICAL;
> > > [...]
> > > ret = uio_register_device(&pdev->dev, &info);
> > >
> > > Userspace maps that memory range and writes its contents to a file:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > fd = open("/dev/uio0", O_RDWR);
> > > if (fd < 0) {
> > > perror("Can't open UIO device\n");
> > > exit(1);
> > > }
> > >
> > > mem_map = mmap(NULL, MAP_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> > > MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0);
> > >
> > > if(mem_map == MAP_FAILED) {
> > > perror("Can't map UIO memory\n");
> > > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > goto out_file;
> > > }
> > > [...]
> > > bytes_written = write(fd_file, mem_map, MAP_SIZE)
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > munmap(mem_map);
> >
> > >From my point of view (I've got Jan's full test case code), this
> > is a completely correct UIO use case.
> >
> > >
> > > So, what happens is (I'm currently testing with 3.0.3 on ARM
> > > VersatilePB): When I do the munmap(), I run into the following error:
> > >
> > > BUG: Bad page state in process uio_test pfn:078ed
> > > page:c0409154 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0
> > > page flags: 0x284(referenced|slab|arch_1)
>
> PG_slab is set. The kernel is complaining because a page which was
> allocated via kmalloc/kmem_cache_alloc was directly passed to the page
> allocator for freeing. It should have been passed to kfree().
>
> Presumably the uio driver expects that its memory was allocated via
> alloc_pages(), not via kmalloc().
Thanks for that hint. I'll check and will update UIO documentation
accordingly if necessary.
BUT the following problems are still threatening my mental health:
If userspace gets a valid and working pointer from mmap(), it is
entitled to expect munmap() to work on that pointer, too, isn't it?
Shouldn't mmap() fail in such a case?
The kernel's behavior should be the same, no matter which SLAB or
SLUB is chosen.
Or am I following wrong philosophies?
Thanks,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-01 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-29 15:05 bade page state while calling munmap() for kmalloc'ed UIO memory Jan Altenberg
2011-08-31 9:58 ` Hans J. Koch
2011-08-31 9:58 ` Hans J. Koch
2011-08-31 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-31 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-01 18:55 ` Hans J. Koch [this message]
2011-09-01 18:55 ` Hans J. Koch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110901185502.GB8408@local \
--to=hjk@hansjkoch.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=b.spranger@linutronix.de \
--cc=jan@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.