All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: tiwai@suse.de, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound: Fix race condition in the pcm_lib "wait for space loop
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 20:07:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110906200736.785edef3@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110906155954.bb9c42eb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:59:54 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > --- a/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
> > +++ b/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
> > @@ -1761,6 +1761,10 @@ static int wait_for_avail(struct
> > snd_pcm_substream *substream, snd_pcm_uframes_t avail = 0;
> >  	long wait_time, tout;
> >  
> > +	init_waitqueue_entry(&wait, current);
> > +	add_wait_queue(&runtime->tsleep, &wait);
> > +	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> 
> Well, this isn't very good either.  if a wakeup gets delivered to
> runtime->tsleep before the set_current_state(), this process will go
> ahead and incorrectly set itself into TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.

... and then check the condition for exit, and then set it to
TASK_RUNABLE a the end...

> 
> That looks like it will be dont-care/cant-happen in this case, but
> it's setting a bad example.

agreed that your ordering is more clean/better.....



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound: Fix race condition in the pcm_lib "wait for space loop
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 20:07:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110906200736.785edef3@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110906155954.bb9c42eb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:59:54 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > --- a/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
> > +++ b/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
> > @@ -1761,6 +1761,10 @@ static int wait_for_avail(struct
> > snd_pcm_substream *substream, snd_pcm_uframes_t avail = 0;
> >  	long wait_time, tout;
> >  
> > +	init_waitqueue_entry(&wait, current);
> > +	add_wait_queue(&runtime->tsleep, &wait);
> > +	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> 
> Well, this isn't very good either.  if a wakeup gets delivered to
> runtime->tsleep before the set_current_state(), this process will go
> ahead and incorrectly set itself into TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.

... and then check the condition for exit, and then set it to
TASK_RUNABLE a the end...

> 
> That looks like it will be dont-care/cant-happen in this case, but
> it's setting a bad example.

agreed that your ordering is more clean/better.....



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-07  3:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-05 16:49 [PATCH] sound: Fix race condition in the pcm_lib "wait for space loop Arjan van de Ven
2011-09-05 16:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2011-09-06 22:59 ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-06 22:59   ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-07  3:07   ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2011-09-07  3:07     ` Arjan van de Ven
2011-09-12  9:57 ` [alsa-devel] " Takashi Iwai
2011-09-15  7:11   ` Takashi Iwai
2011-09-15  7:11     ` [alsa-devel] " Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110906200736.785edef3@infradead.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.