All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Cc: grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
	spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	shawn.guo@freescale.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi/imx: Fix spi-imx when the hardware SPI chipselects are used
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:17:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110915181707.GC29357@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316103406-16401-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com>

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 01:16:46PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> commit 22a85e4cd51 (spi/imx: add device tree probe support) broke spi-imx usage
> when the SPI chipselect is the one internal to the controller.
> 
> On a mx31pdk board the following error is seen:
> 
> Registering mxc_nand as whole device
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:101 gpio_ensure_requested+0x4c/0xf4()
> autorequest GPIO-0
> Modules linked in:
> [<c0014410>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c0025754>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64)
> [<c0025754>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64) from [<c0025800>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40)
> [<c0025800>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40) from [<c0198688>] (gpio_ensure_requested+0x4c/0xf4)
> [<c0198688>] (gpio_ensure_requested+0x4c/0xf4) from [<c01988c8>] (gpio_direction_output+0xa0/0x138)
> [<c01988c8>] (gpio_direction_output+0xa0/0x138) from [<c01ed198>] (spi_imx_setup+0x38/0x4c)
> [<c01ed198>] (spi_imx_setup+0x38/0x4c) from [<c01eb5d0>] (spi_setup+0x38/0x50)
> [<c01eb5d0>] (spi_setup+0x38/0x50) from [<c01eb85c>] (spi_add_device+0x94/0x124)
> [<c01eb85c>] (spi_add_device+0x94/0x124) from [<c01eb960>] (spi_new_device+0x74/0xac)
> [<c01eb960>] (spi_new_device+0x74/0xac) from [<c01eb9b8>] (spi_match_master_to_boardinfo+0x20/0x40)
> [<c01eb9b8>] (spi_match_master_to_boardinfo+0x20/0x40) from [<c01eba88>] (spi_register_master+0xb0/0x104)
> [<c01eba88>] (spi_register_master+0xb0/0x104) from [<c01ec0b4>] (spi_bitbang_start+0x104/0x17c)
> [<c01ec0b4>] (spi_bitbang_start+0x104/0x17c) from [<c02c2c4c>] (spi_imx_probe+0x2fc/0x404)
> [<c02c2c4c>] (spi_imx_probe+0x2fc/0x404) from [<c01c2498>] (platform_drv_probe+0x18/0x1c)
> [<c01c2498>] (platform_drv_probe+0x18/0x1c) from [<c01c1058>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x174)
> [<c01c1058>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x174) from [<c01c11e0>] (__driver_attach+0x8c/0x90)
> [<c01c11e0>] (__driver_attach+0x8c/0x90) from [<c01c0860>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x60/0x8c)
> [<c01c0860>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x60/0x8c) from [<c01c0088>] (bus_add_driver+0xa0/0x288)
> [<c01c0088>] (bus_add_driver+0xa0/0x288) from [<c01c179c>] (driver_register+0x78/0x18c)
> [<c01c179c>] (driver_register+0x78/0x18c) from [<c0008490>] (do_one_initcall+0x34/0x178)
> [<c0008490>] (do_one_initcall+0x34/0x178) from [<c03a5204>] (kernel_init+0x74/0x118)
> [<c03a5204>] (kernel_init+0x74/0x118) from [<c000f65c>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
> ---[ end trace 759f924b30fd5a44 ]---
> 
> Fix this issue by using the original chip select logic and make spi-imx to work again.
> 
> Tested on a mx31pdk that uses the hardware SPI chipselect pins and also
> on a mx27pdk that uses GPIO as SPI chipselect.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-imx.c |    8 +++-----
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> index 8ac6542..7821c48 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> @@ -783,12 +783,10 @@ static int __devinit spi_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	spi_imx->bitbang.master = spi_master_get(master);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < master->num_chipselect; i++) {
> -		int cs_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "cs-gpios", i);
> -		if (cs_gpio < 0)
> -			cs_gpio = mxc_platform_info->chipselect[i];
> -		if (cs_gpio < 0)
> +		spi_imx->chipselect[i] = mxc_platform_info->chipselect[i];
> +		if (spi_imx->chipselect[i] < 0)
>  			continue;
> -		spi_imx->chipselect[i] = cs_gpio;
> +
>  		ret = gpio_request(spi_imx->chipselect[i], DRIVER_NAME);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			while (i > 0) {
I think this is wrong. My first guess is you need to move

	spi_imx->chipselect[i] = cs_gpio;

before

	if (cs_gpio < 0)
		continue;

Does that make sense and works?

Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] spi/imx: Fix spi-imx when the hardware SPI chipselects are used
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:17:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110915181707.GC29357@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316103406-16401-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com>

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 01:16:46PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> commit 22a85e4cd51 (spi/imx: add device tree probe support) broke spi-imx usage
> when the SPI chipselect is the one internal to the controller.
> 
> On a mx31pdk board the following error is seen:
> 
> Registering mxc_nand as whole device
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:101 gpio_ensure_requested+0x4c/0xf4()
> autorequest GPIO-0
> Modules linked in:
> [<c0014410>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c0025754>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64)
> [<c0025754>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64) from [<c0025800>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40)
> [<c0025800>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40) from [<c0198688>] (gpio_ensure_requested+0x4c/0xf4)
> [<c0198688>] (gpio_ensure_requested+0x4c/0xf4) from [<c01988c8>] (gpio_direction_output+0xa0/0x138)
> [<c01988c8>] (gpio_direction_output+0xa0/0x138) from [<c01ed198>] (spi_imx_setup+0x38/0x4c)
> [<c01ed198>] (spi_imx_setup+0x38/0x4c) from [<c01eb5d0>] (spi_setup+0x38/0x50)
> [<c01eb5d0>] (spi_setup+0x38/0x50) from [<c01eb85c>] (spi_add_device+0x94/0x124)
> [<c01eb85c>] (spi_add_device+0x94/0x124) from [<c01eb960>] (spi_new_device+0x74/0xac)
> [<c01eb960>] (spi_new_device+0x74/0xac) from [<c01eb9b8>] (spi_match_master_to_boardinfo+0x20/0x40)
> [<c01eb9b8>] (spi_match_master_to_boardinfo+0x20/0x40) from [<c01eba88>] (spi_register_master+0xb0/0x104)
> [<c01eba88>] (spi_register_master+0xb0/0x104) from [<c01ec0b4>] (spi_bitbang_start+0x104/0x17c)
> [<c01ec0b4>] (spi_bitbang_start+0x104/0x17c) from [<c02c2c4c>] (spi_imx_probe+0x2fc/0x404)
> [<c02c2c4c>] (spi_imx_probe+0x2fc/0x404) from [<c01c2498>] (platform_drv_probe+0x18/0x1c)
> [<c01c2498>] (platform_drv_probe+0x18/0x1c) from [<c01c1058>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x174)
> [<c01c1058>] (driver_probe_device+0x78/0x174) from [<c01c11e0>] (__driver_attach+0x8c/0x90)
> [<c01c11e0>] (__driver_attach+0x8c/0x90) from [<c01c0860>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x60/0x8c)
> [<c01c0860>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x60/0x8c) from [<c01c0088>] (bus_add_driver+0xa0/0x288)
> [<c01c0088>] (bus_add_driver+0xa0/0x288) from [<c01c179c>] (driver_register+0x78/0x18c)
> [<c01c179c>] (driver_register+0x78/0x18c) from [<c0008490>] (do_one_initcall+0x34/0x178)
> [<c0008490>] (do_one_initcall+0x34/0x178) from [<c03a5204>] (kernel_init+0x74/0x118)
> [<c03a5204>] (kernel_init+0x74/0x118) from [<c000f65c>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
> ---[ end trace 759f924b30fd5a44 ]---
> 
> Fix this issue by using the original chip select logic and make spi-imx to work again.
> 
> Tested on a mx31pdk that uses the hardware SPI chipselect pins and also
> on a mx27pdk that uses GPIO as SPI chipselect.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-imx.c |    8 +++-----
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> index 8ac6542..7821c48 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> @@ -783,12 +783,10 @@ static int __devinit spi_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	spi_imx->bitbang.master = spi_master_get(master);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < master->num_chipselect; i++) {
> -		int cs_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "cs-gpios", i);
> -		if (cs_gpio < 0)
> -			cs_gpio = mxc_platform_info->chipselect[i];
> -		if (cs_gpio < 0)
> +		spi_imx->chipselect[i] = mxc_platform_info->chipselect[i];
> +		if (spi_imx->chipselect[i] < 0)
>  			continue;
> -		spi_imx->chipselect[i] = cs_gpio;
> +
>  		ret = gpio_request(spi_imx->chipselect[i], DRIVER_NAME);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			while (i > 0) {
I think this is wrong. My first guess is you need to move

	spi_imx->chipselect[i] = cs_gpio;

before

	if (cs_gpio < 0)
		continue;

Does that make sense and works?

Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-15 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-15 16:16 [PATCH] spi/imx: Fix spi-imx when the hardware SPI chipselects are used Fabio Estevam
2011-09-15 16:16 ` Fabio Estevam
2011-09-15 18:17 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2011-09-15 18:17   ` Uwe Kleine-König
     [not found]   ` <20110915181707.GC29357-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-15 18:27     ` Fabio Estevam
2011-09-15 18:27       ` Fabio Estevam
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-15 18:26 Fabio Estevam
2011-09-15 18:26 ` Fabio Estevam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110915181707.GC29357@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=shawn.guo@freescale.com \
    --cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.