From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: krkumar2@in.ibm.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, joe@perches.com,
shemminger@vyatta.com
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 22:17:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110917191709.GA6127@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110917055639.32666.89940.stgit@dhcp-91-7.nay.redhat.com.englab.nay.redhat.com>
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 02:02:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> A wiki-page was created to narrate the detail design of all parts
> involved in the multi queue implementation:
> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue and some basic tests result
> could be seen in this page
> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue-performance-Sep-13. I would
> post the detail numbers in attachment as the reply of this thread.
Does it make sense to test both with and without RPS in guest?
--
MST
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: krkumar2@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, joe@perches.com,
shemminger@vyatta.com, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 22:17:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110917191709.GA6127@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110917055639.32666.89940.stgit@dhcp-91-7.nay.redhat.com.englab.nay.redhat.com>
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 02:02:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> A wiki-page was created to narrate the detail design of all parts
> involved in the multi queue implementation:
> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue and some basic tests result
> could be seen in this page
> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue-performance-Sep-13. I would
> post the detail numbers in attachment as the reply of this thread.
Does it make sense to test both with and without RPS in guest?
--
MST
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: krkumar2@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, joe@perches.com,
shemminger@vyatta.com, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 22:17:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110917191709.GA6127@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110917055639.32666.89940.stgit@dhcp-91-7.nay.redhat.com.englab.nay.redhat.com>
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 02:02:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> A wiki-page was created to narrate the detail design of all parts
> involved in the multi queue implementation:
> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue and some basic tests result
> could be seen in this page
> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue-performance-Sep-13. I would
> post the detail numbers in attachment as the reply of this thread.
Does it make sense to test both with and without RPS in guest?
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-17 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-17 6:02 [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:02 ` [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 1/5] tuntap: move socket to tun_file Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:02 ` [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 2/5] tuntap: categorize ioctl Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:02 ` [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 3/5] tuntap: introduce multiqueue flags Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:02 ` [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 4/5] tuntap: multiqueue support Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:03 ` [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 5/5] tuntap: add ioctls to attach or detach a file form tap device Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jason Wang
2011-09-17 19:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-09-17 19:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-17 19:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-19 9:44 ` Jason Wang
2011-09-19 9:44 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jason Wang
2011-09-19 9:44 ` Jason Wang
2011-09-19 14:45 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-09-19 14:45 ` [Qemu-devel] " Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110917191709.GA6127@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.