From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
"paul@pwsan.com" <paul@pwsan.com>,
"Hilman, Kevin" <khilman@ti.com>,
"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@ti.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] OMAP2+: board-generic: Add DT support to generic board
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:37:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110926213750.GG6324@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E80717A.3040502@ti.com>
* Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@ti.com> [110926 05:01]:
> On 9/24/2011 1:08 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >* Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com> [110923 12:50]:
> >>Re-cycle the original board-generic file to support Device Tree
> >>for every OMAP2+ variants.
> >>Note: Since it is a completely new content in the existing file
> >>I removed the original copyright.
> >
> >I'd suggest just keeping it, maybe just update the comments
> >accordingly?
>
> Do you mean keeping it and adding the comment? Or removing it and
> adding the comment?
Maybe just update the comment accordingly for DT?
> >That's because Copyrights in general just don't "disappear".
>
> OK, maybe, but I thought it is weird to keep an old copyright just
> because we re-use an already existing file since the content is
> different.
Yeah.. But it's still a good idea not to mess with the copyrights
as as you would need permissions from the copyright holders.
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/11] OMAP2+: board-generic: Add DT support to generic board
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:37:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110926213750.GG6324@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E80717A.3040502@ti.com>
* Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@ti.com> [110926 05:01]:
> On 9/24/2011 1:08 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >* Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com> [110923 12:50]:
> >>Re-cycle the original board-generic file to support Device Tree
> >>for every OMAP2+ variants.
> >>Note: Since it is a completely new content in the existing file
> >>I removed the original copyright.
> >
> >I'd suggest just keeping it, maybe just update the comments
> >accordingly?
>
> Do you mean keeping it and adding the comment? Or removing it and
> adding the comment?
Maybe just update the comment accordingly for DT?
> >That's because Copyrights in general just don't "disappear".
>
> OK, maybe, but I thought it is weird to keep an old copyright just
> because we re-use an already existing file since the content is
> different.
Yeah.. But it's still a good idea not to mess with the copyrights
as as you would need permissions from the copyright holders.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-26 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-23 20:23 [PATCH 00/11] OMAP: Add initial support for DT on OMAP3 & OMAP4 Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 01/11] OMAP2+: Add SoC specific map_io functions Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 23:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:16 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Use SoC specifc map_io Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:16 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:18 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove custom init_irq for remaining boards Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 23:18 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-04 15:59 ` [PATCH 01/11] OMAP2+: Add SoC specific map_io functions Thomas Petazzoni
2012-05-04 15:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-05-14 15:06 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-14 15:06 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-14 19:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-05-14 19:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 02/11] arm/dts: Add initial device tree support for OMAP4 SoC Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 03/11] arm/dts: Add support for OMAP4 PandaBoard Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:21 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-23 23:21 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-26 12:38 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 12:38 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 04/11] arm/dts: Add support for OMAP4 SDP board Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 05/11] arm/dts: Add initial device tree support for OMAP3 SoC Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 06/11] arm/dts: Add support for OMAP3 Beagle board Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 07/11] OMAP2+: board-generic: Add DT support to generic board Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 23:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 12:35 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 12:35 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 21:37 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2011-09-26 21:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 6:32 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-09-26 6:32 ` Rajendra Nayak
[not found] ` <4E801C62.5020700-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-26 9:00 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 9:00 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 08/11] OMAP2+: board-generic: Add i2c static init Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 23:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 23:47 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-23 23:47 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-26 16:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 16:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 09/11] OMAP2+: l3-noc: Add support for device-tree Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 10/11] arm/dts: OMAP4: Add a main ocp entry bound to l3-noc driver Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 22:58 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 22:58 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 12:13 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 12:13 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 21:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-26 21:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-23 20:23 ` [PATCH 11/11] arm/dts: OMAP3+: Add mpu, dsp and iva nodes Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 20:23 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-09-23 23:26 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-23 23:26 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110926213750.GG6324@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.