All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul@paulmenage.org,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, davem@davemloft.net, gthelen@google.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kirill@shutemov.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 05:06:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110928030623.GF7761@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKTCnzm_BVOLK8c0rwYoDJCs+-920DWjwHFoQtgriRTEXrGiqw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 07:59:31AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> > Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> writes:
> >
> >> This patch uses the "tcp_max_mem" field of the kmem_cgroup to
> >> effectively control the amount of kernel memory pinned by a cgroup.
> >>
> >> We have to make sure that none of the memory pressure thresholds
> >> specified in the namespace are bigger than the current cgroup.
> >
> > I noticed that some other OS known by bash seem to have a rlimit per
> > process for this. Would that make sense too? Not sure how difficult
> > your infrastructure would be to extend to that.
> 
> rlimit per process for tcp usage? Interesting, that reminds me, we
> need to revisit rlimit (RSS) at some point

I would love to have that for some situations!
-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul@paulmenage.org,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, davem@davemloft.net, gthelen@google.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kirill@shutemov.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 05:06:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110928030623.GF7761@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKTCnzm_BVOLK8c0rwYoDJCs+-920DWjwHFoQtgriRTEXrGiqw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 07:59:31AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> > Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> writes:
> >
> >> This patch uses the "tcp_max_mem" field of the kmem_cgroup to
> >> effectively control the amount of kernel memory pinned by a cgroup.
> >>
> >> We have to make sure that none of the memory pressure thresholds
> >> specified in the namespace are bigger than the current cgroup.
> >
> > I noticed that some other OS known by bash seem to have a rlimit per
> > process for this. Would that make sense too? Not sure how difficult
> > your infrastructure would be to extend to that.
> 
> rlimit per process for tcp usage? Interesting, that reminds me, we
> need to revisit rlimit (RSS) at some point

I would love to have that for some situations!
-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-28  3:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-19  0:56 [PATCH v3 0/7] per-cgroup tcp buffer pressure settings Glauber Costa
2011-09-19  0:56 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-19  0:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller Glauber Costa
2011-09-19  0:56   ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-21  2:23   ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-21  2:23     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-21  2:23     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-22  3:17     ` Balbir Singh
2011-09-22  3:17       ` Balbir Singh
2011-09-22  3:19       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-22  3:19         ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-22  3:19         ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 14:43       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 14:43         ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 14:43         ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-27 10:06         ` Balbir Singh
2011-09-27 10:06           ` Balbir Singh
2011-09-22  5:58   ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-22  5:58     ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-26 10:34   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-26 10:34     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-26 22:44     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 22:44       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 22:44       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 23:18     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 23:18       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 23:18       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-28  0:58       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-28  0:58         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-28  0:58         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-28 12:03         ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-28 12:03           ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-28 12:03           ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-19  0:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] socket: initial cgroup code Glauber Costa
2011-09-19  0:56   ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-21 18:47   ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-21 18:47     ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-21 18:59     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-21 18:59       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-21 18:59       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-22  6:00       ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-22  6:00         ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-22 15:09         ` Balbir Singh
2011-09-22 15:09           ` Balbir Singh
2011-09-24 13:33           ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 13:33             ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 13:33             ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 13:40           ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 13:40             ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 13:40             ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 14:45           ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 14:45             ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 14:45             ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 10:52             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-26 10:52               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-26 10:52               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-26 22:47               ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 22:47                 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 22:47                 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-28  0:56                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-28  0:56                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-27 20:43               ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-27 20:43                 ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-19  0:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling Glauber Costa
2011-09-19  0:56   ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-19  0:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] per-cgroup tcp buffers control Glauber Costa
2011-09-19  0:56   ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 10:59   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-26 10:59     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-26 22:48     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 22:48       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 22:48       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-27  1:53     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-27  1:53       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-27  1:53       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-28  1:09       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-28  1:09         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-26 14:39   ` Andrew Vagin
2011-09-26 14:39     ` Andrew Vagin
2011-09-26 22:52     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 22:52       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 22:52       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-19  0:56 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] per-netns ipv4 sysctl_tcp_mem Glauber Costa
2011-09-19  0:56   ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-19  0:56 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit Glauber Costa
2011-09-19  0:56   ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-22  6:01   ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-22  6:01     ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-22  9:58     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-22  9:58       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-22  9:58       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-09-22 15:44       ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-22 15:44         ` Greg Thelen
2011-09-24 13:30     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 13:30       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 13:30       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 11:02       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-26 11:02         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-26 11:02         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-09-26 22:49         ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 22:49           ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-26 22:49           ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-22 23:08   ` Balbir Singh
2011-09-22 23:08     ` Balbir Singh
2011-09-24 13:35     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 13:35       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 13:35       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 16:58   ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-24 16:58     ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-24 17:27     ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 17:27       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-24 17:27       ` Glauber Costa
2011-09-28  2:29     ` Balbir Singh
2011-09-28  2:29       ` Balbir Singh
2011-09-28  3:06       ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2011-09-28  3:06         ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-19  0:56 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] Display current tcp memory allocation in kmem cgroup Glauber Costa
2011-09-19  0:56   ` Glauber Costa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110928030623.GF7761@one.firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.