From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
sameo@linux.intel.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dilinger@queued.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: allow mfd_cell association with device tree node
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:31:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110928123154.GG3279@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMLZHHRvr-diYGwZ2Kg647Ht7NNb8LEku0pCW8EujRuUeOW5yQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:07:43AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Mark Brown
> > You're modifying global data which should really be const and is shared
> > between multiple devices in place. Probably you'll not notice any
> > practical effects, especially if you don't happen to have multiple
> > devices in the same system.
> I see. In this case, it would be impossible to have two VX855s in the
> same system, and if you did, you would have bigger problems. In this
> context what we're doing is safe.
Right, but your modification was to the MFD core so it's going to affect
other devices...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-28 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-21 12:01 [PATCH 1/3] mfd: allow mfd_cell association with device tree node Daniel Drake
2011-09-21 12:01 ` Daniel Drake
2011-09-21 12:49 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-21 12:49 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-21 13:02 ` Daniel Drake
2011-09-21 13:02 ` Daniel Drake
2011-09-21 13:16 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-27 14:44 ` Daniel Drake
2011-09-27 15:05 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-27 15:18 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-27 16:44 ` Daniel Drake
2011-09-27 18:14 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-27 18:25 ` Daniel Drake
2011-09-27 18:26 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-27 18:26 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-27 18:28 ` Daniel Drake
2011-09-27 18:28 ` Daniel Drake
2011-09-27 18:38 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-27 18:38 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-28 9:07 ` Daniel Drake
2011-09-28 12:31 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-10-03 8:40 ` Daniel Drake
2011-10-03 10:28 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-03 10:39 ` Daniel Drake
2011-10-03 10:39 ` Daniel Drake
2011-10-03 12:16 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-03 12:30 ` Daniel Drake
2011-10-03 12:30 ` Daniel Drake
2011-10-03 12:40 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-03 12:40 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-03 12:53 ` Daniel Drake
2011-10-03 12:53 ` Daniel Drake
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-21 12:01 Daniel Drake
2011-09-28 9:08 Daniel Drake
2011-09-28 9:08 Daniel Drake
2011-09-28 9:08 ` Daniel Drake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110928123154.GG3279@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=dilinger@queued.net \
--cc=dsd@laptop.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.