From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 9/9] xen/p2m/debugfs: Fix potential pointer exception.
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:37:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111003163757.GH17108@phenom.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317370697.26672.230.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 09:18:17AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 20:52 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > We could be referencing the last + 1 element of level_name[]
> > array which would cause a pointer exception.
>
> If we end up accessing it does that not mean something, i.e. should it
> not be a real string here and not NULL? Otherwise isn't it a bug in the
> lookup code that we end up looking there?
Yup. I altereted it per your recommendation to be "error".
>
> I think this lookup correspond to the initialisation of lvl=4 and
> falling through the subsequent list of checks without matching one. In
> which case I think level_name[4] should be "unknown" or even "error".
Picked "error"
>
> I don't think you can hit type_name[4] in the same way, type and
> prev_type are always one of the TYPE_* defines, which have values 0..3
> inclusive. You could make this more obvious and defend against future
> changes breaking this with:
> ... type_name[] = {
> [TYPE_IDENTITY] = "identity",
> [TYPE_MISSING] = "missing"
> ...
> };
Oooh, pretty. OK, queued another patch with that.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] xen/p2m/debugfs: Fix potential pointer exception.
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:37:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111003163757.GH17108@phenom.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317370697.26672.230.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 09:18:17AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 20:52 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > We could be referencing the last + 1 element of level_name[]
> > array which would cause a pointer exception.
>
> If we end up accessing it does that not mean something, i.e. should it
> not be a real string here and not NULL? Otherwise isn't it a bug in the
> lookup code that we end up looking there?
Yup. I altereted it per your recommendation to be "error".
>
> I think this lookup correspond to the initialisation of lvl=4 and
> falling through the subsequent list of checks without matching one. In
> which case I think level_name[4] should be "unknown" or even "error".
Picked "error"
>
> I don't think you can hit type_name[4] in the same way, type and
> prev_type are always one of the TYPE_* defines, which have values 0..3
> inclusive. You could make this more obvious and defend against future
> changes breaking this with:
> ... type_name[] = {
> [TYPE_IDENTITY] = "identity",
> [TYPE_MISSING] = "missing"
> ...
> };
Oooh, pretty. OK, queued another patch with that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-03 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-29 19:52 [PATCH] Xen bug-fixes for 3.2 (v1) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/9] xen/pciback: Do not dereference psdev during printk when it is NULL Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-30 7:31 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2011-09-30 7:31 ` Jan Beulich
2011-10-03 16:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 2/9] xen/pciback: Return proper error code from sscanf Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-30 7:45 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2011-09-30 7:45 ` Jan Beulich
2011-10-03 16:18 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 3/9] xen/pciback: Check if the device is found instead of blindly assuming so Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-30 7:50 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2011-09-30 7:50 ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 4/9] xen/events: BUG() when we can't allocate our event->irq array Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-30 7:55 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-10-03 16:21 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 5/9] xen/events: Don't check the info for NULL as it is already done Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] xen/irq: If we fail during msi_capability_init return proper error code Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] xen/xenbus: Check before dereferencing it Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-30 8:01 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-10-03 16:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 8/9] xen/enlighten: Fix compile warnings Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-30 8:10 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-09-30 8:10 ` Ian Campbell
2011-10-03 16:30 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-29 19:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] xen/p2m/debugfs: Fix potential pointer exception Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-30 8:18 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-10-03 16:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-10-03 16:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111003163757.GH17108@phenom.oracle.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.