From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [BUGFIX] ftrace/kprobes: Fix not to delete probes if in use
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:44:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111004104438.14591.6553.stgit@fedora15> (raw)
Fix kprobe-tracer not to delete a probe if the probe is in use.
In that case, delete operation will return -EBUSY.
This bug can cause a kernel panic if enabled probes are deleted
during perf record.
(Add some probes on functions)
# perf record -e probe:\* -aR sh
sh-4.2# perf probe --del probe:\*
sh-4.2# exit
(kernel panic)
This is originally reported on the fedora bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742383
I've also checked that this problem doesn't happen on
tracepoints when module removing because perf event
locks target module.
$ sudo ./perf record -e xfs:\* -aR sh
sh-4.2# rmmod xfs
ERROR: Module xfs is in use
sh-4.2# exit
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.203 MB perf.data (~8862 samples) ]
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@redhat.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
index 5fb3697..00d527c 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
@@ -836,11 +836,17 @@ static void __unregister_trace_probe(struct trace_probe *tp)
}
/* Unregister a trace_probe and probe_event: call with locking probe_lock */
-static void unregister_trace_probe(struct trace_probe *tp)
+static int unregister_trace_probe(struct trace_probe *tp)
{
+ /* Enabled event can not be unregistered */
+ if (trace_probe_is_enabled(tp))
+ return -EBUSY;
+
__unregister_trace_probe(tp);
list_del(&tp->list);
unregister_probe_event(tp);
+
+ return 0;
}
/* Register a trace_probe and probe_event */
@@ -854,7 +860,9 @@ static int register_trace_probe(struct trace_probe *tp)
/* Delete old (same name) event if exist */
old_tp = find_trace_probe(tp->call.name, tp->call.class->system);
if (old_tp) {
- unregister_trace_probe(old_tp);
+ ret = unregister_trace_probe(old_tp);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto end;
free_trace_probe(old_tp);
}
@@ -892,6 +900,7 @@ static int trace_probe_module_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
mutex_lock(&probe_lock);
list_for_each_entry(tp, &probe_list, list) {
if (trace_probe_within_module(tp, mod)) {
+ /* Don't need to check busy - this should have gone. */
__unregister_trace_probe(tp);
ret = __register_trace_probe(tp);
if (ret)
@@ -1205,10 +1214,11 @@ static int create_trace_probe(int argc, char **argv)
return -ENOENT;
}
/* delete an event */
- unregister_trace_probe(tp);
- free_trace_probe(tp);
+ ret = unregister_trace_probe(tp);
+ if (ret == 0)
+ free_trace_probe(tp);
mutex_unlock(&probe_lock);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
if (argc < 2) {
@@ -1317,18 +1327,29 @@ error:
return ret;
}
-static void release_all_trace_probes(void)
+static int release_all_trace_probes(void)
{
struct trace_probe *tp;
+ int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&probe_lock);
+ /* Ensure no probe is in use. */
+ list_for_each_entry(tp, &probe_list, list)
+ if (trace_probe_is_enabled(tp)) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto end;
+ }
/* TODO: Use batch unregistration */
while (!list_empty(&probe_list)) {
tp = list_entry(probe_list.next, struct trace_probe, list);
unregister_trace_probe(tp);
free_trace_probe(tp);
}
+
+end:
mutex_unlock(&probe_lock);
+
+ return ret;
}
/* Probes listing interfaces */
@@ -1380,9 +1401,13 @@ static const struct seq_operations probes_seq_op = {
static int probes_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
- if ((file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) &&
- (file->f_flags & O_TRUNC))
- release_all_trace_probes();
+ int ret;
+
+ if ((file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) && (file->f_flags & O_TRUNC)) {
+ ret = release_all_trace_probes();
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
return seq_open(file, &probes_seq_op);
}
@@ -2055,6 +2080,21 @@ static __init int kprobe_trace_self_tests_init(void)
ret = target(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
+ /* Disable trace points before removing it */
+ tp = find_trace_probe("testprobe", KPROBE_EVENT_SYSTEM);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(tp == NULL)) {
+ pr_warning("error on getting test probe.\n");
+ warn++;
+ } else
+ disable_trace_probe(tp, TP_FLAG_TRACE);
+
+ tp = find_trace_probe("testprobe2", KPROBE_EVENT_SYSTEM);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(tp == NULL)) {
+ pr_warning("error on getting 2nd test probe.\n");
+ warn++;
+ } else
+ disable_trace_probe(tp, TP_FLAG_TRACE);
+
ret = command_trace_probe("-:testprobe");
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret)) {
pr_warning("error on deleting a probe.\n");
next reply other threads:[~2011-10-04 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-04 10:44 Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2011-10-04 10:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] [TRIVIAL] ftrace/kprobes: Fix an warning typo Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-04 15:58 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-10-05 4:08 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-04 10:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] [TRIVIAL] perftools: Fix a typo of command name as trace-cmd Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-04 10:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] [BUGFIX] perf probe: Fix to show correct error string Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-08 5:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] [BUGFIX] ftrace/kprobes: Fix not to delete probes if in use Steven Rostedt
2011-10-10 14:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-10 19:11 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111004104438.14591.6553.stgit@fedora15 \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.