From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@samsung.com>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"younglak1004.kim@samsung.com" <younglak1004.kim@samsung.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Sanghyun Lee <sanghyun75.lee@samsung.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] iommu/exynos: Use bus_set_iommu instead of register_iommu
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:37:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111007113701.GC1512@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHQjnOPiAOA_RiHnF-aVEYnWcdkwNzVD1BTNua+-ztZrW_+6_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 08:52:45AM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Roedel, Joerg <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:31:49AM -0400, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >> From: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@samsung.com>
> >>
> >> This replaces register_iommu() with bus_set_iommu() according to the
> >> suggestion of Joerg Roedel.
> >
> > This should be part of patch 3 already when the bus_set_iommu() change
> > is merged. Otherwise it breaks bisectability too.
> >
> Ok.
> Should I include fault handling feature (patch 4) in the patch 3 also?
Yes, makes sense to include patch 4 too.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: joro@8bytes.org (Joerg Roedel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] iommu/exynos: Use bus_set_iommu instead of register_iommu
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:37:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111007113701.GC1512@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHQjnOPiAOA_RiHnF-aVEYnWcdkwNzVD1BTNua+-ztZrW_+6_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 08:52:45AM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Roedel, Joerg <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:31:49AM -0400, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >> From: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@samsung.com>
> >>
> >> This replaces register_iommu() with bus_set_iommu() according to the
> >> suggestion of Joerg Roedel.
> >
> > This should be part of patch 3 already when the bus_set_iommu() change
> > is merged. Otherwise it breaks bisectability too.
> >
> Ok.
> Should I include fault handling feature (patch 4) in the patch 3 also?
Yes, makes sense to include patch 4 too.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@samsung.com>
Cc: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Sanghyun Lee <sanghyun75.lee@samsung.com>,
"younglak1004.kim@samsung.com" <younglak1004.kim@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] iommu/exynos: Use bus_set_iommu instead of register_iommu
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:37:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111007113701.GC1512@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHQjnOPiAOA_RiHnF-aVEYnWcdkwNzVD1BTNua+-ztZrW_+6_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 08:52:45AM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Roedel, Joerg <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:31:49AM -0400, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >> From: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@samsung.com>
> >>
> >> This replaces register_iommu() with bus_set_iommu() according to the
> >> suggestion of Joerg Roedel.
> >
> > This should be part of patch 3 already when the bus_set_iommu() change
> > is merged. Otherwise it breaks bisectability too.
> >
> Ok.
> Should I include fault handling feature (patch 4) in the patch 3 also?
Yes, makes sense to include patch 4 too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-07 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-30 7:31 [PATCH v2 5/5] iommu/exynos: Use bus_set_iommu instead of register_iommu Kukjin Kim
2011-09-30 7:31 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-09-30 7:31 ` Kukjin Kim
2011-09-30 13:46 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-09-30 13:46 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-09-30 23:52 ` KyongHo Cho
2011-09-30 23:52 ` KyongHo Cho
2011-10-07 11:37 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2011-10-07 11:37 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-10-07 11:37 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111007113701.GC1512@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=Joerg.Roedel@amd.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=pullip.cho@samsung.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sanghyun75.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=younglak1004.kim@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.