From: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
To: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-rt-users" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Serieal console on Samsung S3C6410 ARM11 CPU (Was [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.6-rt17)
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:15:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201110082015.17128.jbe@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuYYwSEvA+EHwyhgeZkBX+bB_e1cmFnC6YdEx-CdHzk8peyEw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Abraham wrote:
> On 8 October 2011 16:56, Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> I'm pleased to announce the 3.0.6-rt17 release.
> >
> > I have no idea where to search, but when I'm using the 3.0.6-rt17 on my
> > Samsung S3C6410 ARM based system, the UART (serial console) does not work
> > as expected. Typing only one char at a time is okay. Typing two chars
> > immediately makes the system using 100 % CPU load and takes about 2
> > seconds to respond. It seems the interrupt handling is broken in the UART
> > driver, but I don't know how to fix it.
> >
> > This with a simple cursor up (one char to get the last command) and a
> > small pause to the next "ENTER" char:
> >
> > root@mini6410:~ cat /proc/interrupts | grep 18:
> > 18: 5739107 s3c-uart s3c6400-uart
> >
> > Same again:
> >
> > root@mini6410:~ cat /proc/interrupts | grep 18:
> > 18: 5739113 s3c-uart s3c6400-uart
> >
> > 6 interrupts seems reasonable.
> >
> > Now with cursor up and SPACE immediately, then a pause for ENTER:
> >
> > root@mini6410:~ cat /proc/interrupts | grep 18:
> > 18: 5923815 s3c-uart s3c6400-uart
> >
> > 184702 interrupts looks strange.
>
> Just curious, do you have the following two commits?
>
> serial: samsung: Add unified interrupt handler for s3c64xx and later SoC's
> ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove uart irq handling from platform code
Are they part of the current 3.0.6 vanilla kernel? I'm only using the vanilla
3.0.6 with rt17 on my target.
jbe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert |
Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jbe@pengutronix.de (Juergen Beisert)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Serieal console on Samsung S3C6410 ARM11 CPU (Was [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.6-rt17)
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:15:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201110082015.17128.jbe@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuYYwSEvA+EHwyhgeZkBX+bB_e1cmFnC6YdEx-CdHzk8peyEw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Abraham wrote:
> On 8 October 2011 16:56, Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> I'm pleased to announce the 3.0.6-rt17 release.
> >
> > I have no idea where to search, but when I'm using the 3.0.6-rt17 on my
> > Samsung S3C6410 ARM based system, the UART (serial console) does not work
> > as expected. Typing only one char at a time is okay. Typing two chars
> > immediately makes the system using 100 % CPU load and takes about 2
> > seconds to respond. It seems the interrupt handling is broken in the UART
> > driver, but I don't know how to fix it.
> >
> > This with a simple cursor up (one char to get the last command) and a
> > small pause to the next "ENTER" char:
> >
> > root at mini6410:~ cat /proc/interrupts | grep 18:
> > ?18: ? ?5739107 ?s3c-uart ?s3c6400-uart
> >
> > Same again:
> >
> > root at mini6410:~ cat /proc/interrupts | grep 18:
> > ?18: ? ?5739113 ?s3c-uart ?s3c6400-uart
> >
> > 6 interrupts seems reasonable.
> >
> > Now with cursor up and SPACE immediately, then a pause for ENTER:
> >
> > root at mini6410:~ cat /proc/interrupts | grep 18:
> > ?18: ? ?5923815 ?s3c-uart ?s3c6400-uart
> >
> > 184702 interrupts looks strange.
>
> Just curious, do you have the following two commits?
>
> serial: samsung: Add unified interrupt handler for s3c64xx and later SoC's
> ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove uart irq handling from platform code
Are they part of the current 3.0.6 vanilla kernel? I'm only using the vanilla
3.0.6 with rt17 on my target.
jbe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert |
Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
To: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-rt-users" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Serieal console on Samsung S3C6410 ARM11 CPU (Was [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.6-rt17)
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:15:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201110082015.17128.jbe@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuYYwSEvA+EHwyhgeZkBX+bB_e1cmFnC6YdEx-CdHzk8peyEw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Abraham wrote:
> On 8 October 2011 16:56, Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> I'm pleased to announce the 3.0.6-rt17 release.
> >
> > I have no idea where to search, but when I'm using the 3.0.6-rt17 on my
> > Samsung S3C6410 ARM based system, the UART (serial console) does not work
> > as expected. Typing only one char at a time is okay. Typing two chars
> > immediately makes the system using 100 % CPU load and takes about 2
> > seconds to respond. It seems the interrupt handling is broken in the UART
> > driver, but I don't know how to fix it.
> >
> > This with a simple cursor up (one char to get the last command) and a
> > small pause to the next "ENTER" char:
> >
> > root@mini6410:~ cat /proc/interrupts | grep 18:
> > 18: 5739107 s3c-uart s3c6400-uart
> >
> > Same again:
> >
> > root@mini6410:~ cat /proc/interrupts | grep 18:
> > 18: 5739113 s3c-uart s3c6400-uart
> >
> > 6 interrupts seems reasonable.
> >
> > Now with cursor up and SPACE immediately, then a pause for ENTER:
> >
> > root@mini6410:~ cat /proc/interrupts | grep 18:
> > 18: 5923815 s3c-uart s3c6400-uart
> >
> > 184702 interrupts looks strange.
>
> Just curious, do you have the following two commits?
>
> serial: samsung: Add unified interrupt handler for s3c64xx and later SoC's
> ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove uart irq handling from platform code
Are they part of the current 3.0.6 vanilla kernel? I'm only using the vanilla
3.0.6 with rt17 on my target.
jbe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert |
Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-08 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-07 1:15 [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.6-rt17 Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-07 1:20 ` Madovsky
2011-10-07 1:52 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2011-10-07 4:13 ` Frank Rowand
2011-10-07 8:10 ` Rolando Martins
2011-10-07 8:10 ` Rolando Martins
2011-10-07 17:25 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2011-10-07 19:54 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2011-10-07 22:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-07 23:05 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2011-10-13 7:52 ` [PATCH -rt] hrtimer: Add missing debug_activate() aid [Was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.6-rt17] Yong Zhang
[not found] ` <b11eac52-79af-40ea-a53b-6f77581be035@email.android.com>
2011-10-07 23:14 ` PEBTAO [ was Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.6-rt17 ] Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-07 23:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-10-07 23:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-08 0:26 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-10-08 7:56 ` octoploid
2011-10-08 11:26 ` Serieal console on Samsung S3C6410 ARM11 CPU (Was [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.6-rt17) Juergen Beisert
2011-10-08 13:29 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-10-08 13:29 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-10-08 13:29 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-10-08 18:15 ` Juergen Beisert [this message]
2011-10-08 18:15 ` Juergen Beisert
2011-10-08 18:15 ` Juergen Beisert
2011-10-08 19:01 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-10-08 19:01 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-10-08 19:01 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-10-08 20:56 ` [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.6-rt17 Maarten Lankhorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201110082015.17128.jbe@pengutronix.de \
--to=jbe@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.