From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add multi-node boot support
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:30:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111027073029.GD15923@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319609230-18897-2-git-send-email-daniel@numascale-asia.com>
* Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com> wrote:
> From: Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
>
> From: Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
>
> Fix booting multi-node systems with Numascale's NumaChip.
>
> v2:
> - [Daniel] rediffed and validated against 3.1-rc10
>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> index b13ed39..4b551f5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <asm/apic.h>
> #include <asm/cpu.h>
> #include <asm/pci-direct.h>
> +#include <asm/numachip/numachip.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> # include <asm/numa_64.h>
> @@ -350,6 +351,12 @@ static void __cpuinit srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> node = numa_cpu_node(cpu);
> if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> node = per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu);
> + else if (is_numachip_system()) {
> + /* fix for multi-node systems: set phys_proc_id and cpu_llc_id
> + to node number from ACPI SRAT table */
please use the customary (multi-line) comment style:
/*
* Comment .....
* ...... goes here.
*/
specified in Documentation/CodingStyle.
> + c->phys_proc_id = node;
> + per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = node;
> + }
But more importantly, please first explain why the quirk is needed
(the patch only explains what it does but does not explain why it
needs these changes - other NUMA systems are able to boot without
this quirk).
If it's absolutely needed then add a proper quirk handler instead of
polluting the generic code.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-27 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-26 6:07 [PATCH 1/3] Add Numachip APIC support Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-26 6:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add multi-node boot support Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-27 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-10-27 10:46 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-10-27 11:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 11:42 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-02 18:31 ` Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] Make flat_init_apic_ldr available Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 8:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] v2: Add x86_init platform override to fix up core numbering Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 17:58 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Add x86_init platform override to fix up NUMA " tip-bot for Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-06 6:30 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix the !CONFIG_NUMA build of the new CPU ID fixup code support tip-bot for Steffen Persvold
2011-12-05 8:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] v4: Add support for Numascale's NumaChip Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 9:49 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-05 16:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] v5: Add NumaChip support Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 17:59 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: " tip-bot for Steffen Persvold
2011-12-05 20:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 0:10 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-06 5:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 6:09 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-08 22:35 ` Kevin Winchester
2011-12-09 1:24 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-09 7:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-10 1:52 ` Kevin Winchester
2011-12-10 2:28 ` Kevin Winchester
2011-12-18 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19 0:12 ` [PATCH] x86: Simplify code by allowing more of struct cpuinfo_x86 for the !SMP case Kevin Winchester
2011-12-19 14:07 ` [tip:x86/apic] " tip-bot for Kevin Winchester
2011-12-19 18:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21 0:52 ` [PATCH] " Kevin Winchester
2011-12-21 8:48 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Simplify code by removing a !SMP #ifdefs from 'struct cpuinfo_x86' tip-bot for Kevin Winchester
2011-12-05 17:57 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Make flat_init_apic_ldr() available tip-bot for Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-26 6:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] Add NumaChip quirk Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-27 7:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] Add Numachip APIC support Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 7:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 7:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 10:31 ` Steffen Persvold
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-18 8:22 Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-18 8:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add multi-node boot support Daniel J Blueman
2011-07-22 10:44 [PATCH 1/3] Add Numachip APIC support Daniel J Blueman
2011-07-22 10:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add multi-node boot support Daniel J Blueman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111027073029.GD15923@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=daniel@numascale-asia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sp@numascale.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.