From: Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add multi-node boot support
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:46:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EA93699.9000101@numascale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111027073029.GD15923@elte.hu>
On 10/27/2011 09:30, Ingo Molnar wrote:
[]
>> + c->phys_proc_id = node;
>> + per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = node;
>> + }
>
> But more importantly, please first explain why the quirk is needed
> (the patch only explains what it does but does not explain why it
> needs these changes - other NUMA systems are able to boot without
> this quirk).
The issue is that since all AMD CPUs gets their initial APIC Id assigned
in the power up process on each individual system, when connecting all
systems through Numachip we end up with multiple AMD CPUs with the same
"phys_proc_id". This in turn lets Linux think they have the same llc_id
and we get a oops somewhere in the scheduler code later on (when
scheduler is configured to be numa aware).
>
> If it's absolutely needed then add a proper quirk handler instead of
> polluting the generic code.
>
We wanted to reuse as much of the generic AMD code as possible, but it's
tricky because most of that code is based around a single HT fabric
design, whereas a NumaChip based systems consists of several HT fabrics
connected together thus you will have identical NorthBridge IDs (0-7)
etc. shared between all systems.
How would you suggest we add a quirk handler for it ?
Cheers,
--
Steffen Persvold, Chief Architect NumaChip
Numascale AS - www.numascale.com
Tel: +47 92 49 25 54 Skype: spersvold
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-27 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-26 6:07 [PATCH 1/3] Add Numachip APIC support Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-26 6:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add multi-node boot support Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-27 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 10:46 ` Steffen Persvold [this message]
2011-10-27 11:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 11:42 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-02 18:31 ` Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] Make flat_init_apic_ldr available Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 8:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] v2: Add x86_init platform override to fix up core numbering Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 17:58 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Add x86_init platform override to fix up NUMA " tip-bot for Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-06 6:30 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix the !CONFIG_NUMA build of the new CPU ID fixup code support tip-bot for Steffen Persvold
2011-12-05 8:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] v4: Add support for Numascale's NumaChip Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 9:49 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-05 16:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] v5: Add NumaChip support Daniel J Blueman
2011-12-05 17:59 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: " tip-bot for Steffen Persvold
2011-12-05 20:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 0:10 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-06 5:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-06 6:09 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-08 22:35 ` Kevin Winchester
2011-12-09 1:24 ` Steffen Persvold
2011-12-09 7:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-10 1:52 ` Kevin Winchester
2011-12-10 2:28 ` Kevin Winchester
2011-12-18 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-19 0:12 ` [PATCH] x86: Simplify code by allowing more of struct cpuinfo_x86 for the !SMP case Kevin Winchester
2011-12-19 14:07 ` [tip:x86/apic] " tip-bot for Kevin Winchester
2011-12-19 18:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-21 0:52 ` [PATCH] " Kevin Winchester
2011-12-21 8:48 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Simplify code by removing a !SMP #ifdefs from 'struct cpuinfo_x86' tip-bot for Kevin Winchester
2011-12-05 17:57 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Make flat_init_apic_ldr() available tip-bot for Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-26 6:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] Add NumaChip quirk Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-27 7:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] Add Numachip APIC support Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 7:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 7:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-27 10:31 ` Steffen Persvold
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-18 8:22 Daniel J Blueman
2011-10-18 8:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add multi-node boot support Daniel J Blueman
2011-07-22 10:44 [PATCH 1/3] Add Numachip APIC support Daniel J Blueman
2011-07-22 10:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add multi-node boot support Daniel J Blueman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EA93699.9000101@numascale.com \
--to=sp@numascale.com \
--cc=daniel@numascale-asia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.