From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma: Drop GFP_COMP for DMA memory allocations
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:36:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111031103610.GG19187@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319836732-31687-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 03:18:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> I believe the patch below was once posted to solve this for ARM, but never
> got picked up. Evidently, AVR32 did pick it up. I'm wondering if we should
> pick this up for ARM now, or if there's some other solution?
Well, Nick did talk about a solution using GFP_USERMAP in one of those
threads, which doesn't seem to have gone anywhere. So I guess we need
this patch.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 82a093c..93b86e6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -308,6 +308,13 @@ __dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle, gfp_t gfp,
> struct page *page;
> void *addr;
>
> + /* Following is a work-around (a.k.a. hack) to prevent pages
> + * with __GFP_COMP being passed to split_page() which cannot
> + * handle them. The real problem is that this flag probably
> + * should be 0 on ARM as it is not supported on this
> + * platform--see CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE. */
I don't think this comment makes sense anymore - HUGETLB_PAGE doesn't
have any help text.
> + gfp &= ~(__GFP_COMP);
> +
> *handle = ~0;
> size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
>
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Marc Singer <elf@buici.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Sumit Bhattacharya <sumitb@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: dma: Drop GFP_COMP for DMA memory allocations
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:36:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111031103610.GG19187@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319836732-31687-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 03:18:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> I believe the patch below was once posted to solve this for ARM, but never
> got picked up. Evidently, AVR32 did pick it up. I'm wondering if we should
> pick this up for ARM now, or if there's some other solution?
Well, Nick did talk about a solution using GFP_USERMAP in one of those
threads, which doesn't seem to have gone anywhere. So I guess we need
this patch.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 82a093c..93b86e6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -308,6 +308,13 @@ __dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle, gfp_t gfp,
> struct page *page;
> void *addr;
>
> + /* Following is a work-around (a.k.a. hack) to prevent pages
> + * with __GFP_COMP being passed to split_page() which cannot
> + * handle them. The real problem is that this flag probably
> + * should be 0 on ARM as it is not supported on this
> + * platform--see CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE. */
I don't think this comment makes sense anymore - HUGETLB_PAGE doesn't
have any help text.
> + gfp &= ~(__GFP_COMP);
> +
> *handle = ~0;
> size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
>
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-31 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-28 21:18 [RFC PATCH] arm: dma: Drop GFP_COMP for DMA memory allocations Stephen Warren
2011-10-28 21:18 ` Stephen Warren
2011-10-31 10:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-10-31 10:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111031103610.GG19187@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.