From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tang Feng <feng.tang@intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: writeback tree status (for 3.2 merge window)
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 15:43:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111101074347.GA23644@localhost> (raw)
Hi,
There are 3 patchsets sitting in the writeback tree.
1) IO-less dirty throttling v12
https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/dirty-throttling-v12
2) writeback reasons tracing from Curt Wohlgemuth
https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/writeback-reason
3) writeback queuing changes from Jan Kara and me
https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/requeue-io-wait
They have been merged into this branch testing in linux-next for a while:
https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/writeback-for-next
Since (3) still has an unresolved issue (detailed in the below
links), it looks better to hold it back for this merge window.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1206315
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1206316
The patches from (1,2) together with 2 tracing patches essential for
debugging (1) have been pushed to the "writeback-for-linus" branch:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/wfg/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/writeback-for-linus
If no objections, I'll send a pull request to Linus soon.
Thanks,
Fengguang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tang Feng <feng.tang@intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: writeback tree status (for 3.2 merge window)
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 15:43:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111101074347.GA23644@localhost> (raw)
Hi,
There are 3 patchsets sitting in the writeback tree.
1) IO-less dirty throttling v12
https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/dirty-throttling-v12
2) writeback reasons tracing from Curt Wohlgemuth
https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/writeback-reason
3) writeback queuing changes from Jan Kara and me
https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/requeue-io-wait
They have been merged into this branch testing in linux-next for a while:
https://github.com/fengguang/linux/commits/writeback-for-next
Since (3) still has an unresolved issue (detailed in the below
links), it looks better to hold it back for this merge window.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1206315
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1206316
The patches from (1,2) together with 2 tracing patches essential for
debugging (1) have been pushed to the "writeback-for-linus" branch:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/wfg/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/writeback-for-linus
If no objections, I'll send a pull request to Linus soon.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2011-11-01 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-01 7:43 Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-11-01 7:43 ` writeback tree status (for 3.2 merge window) Wu Fengguang
2011-11-02 9:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-02 9:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-02 9:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-02 15:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-02 15:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-02 15:13 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111101074347.GA23644@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arighi@develer.com \
--cc=curtw@google.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=mrubin@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.